Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 2698–2707 | Cite as

A Microscopic Study of Paper Decayed by Trichoderma harzianum and Paecilomyces variotii

Original Paper
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

The current study is interested in evaluating the decay of cotton, Whatman and chemical pulp caused by Trichoderma harzianum and Paecilomyces variotii. The structural changes of the paper were evaluated by Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The SEM results show differences in hyphae colonization and paper decay patterns between studied species under the current study; P. variotii caused an eroded structure in the cotton (cavity forming), whereas the initial T. harzianum colonization produced rupture and erosion (soft-rot decay type II) for the three types of paper ,the gaps were elongated with sharp pointed ends, which consisted either of individual cavities or in chains. Moreover, FTIR results confirmed that there a relationship could be observed between fungal decay and crystalline cellulose content because the intensity of peaks at 1335 and 1111 cm−1 significantly decreased due to the fungal decay. Furthermore, the intensity of O–H stretching absorption slightly decreased, and this may be attributed to hydrolysis of cellulose molecules.

Keywords

Hyphae Polysaccharides FTIR Hydrolysis Erosion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Dr. Ahmed Ramzy, Scanning Electron Microscope Laboratory, National Research Centre, Dokki - Giza - Egypt, for the technical assistance he provided.

References

  1. 1.
    Allsopp D, Seal K, Gaylarde C (2004) Introduction to biodeterioration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arai H (2000) Foxing caused by fungi: twenty-five years of study. Biodeterior Biodegr 46(3):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanchette RA, Nilsson T, Daniel G, Abad A (1990) Biological degradation of wood. In: Rowell RM, Barbour RJ (eds) Archaeological wood: properties, chemistry, and preservation. Advances in chemistry series 225. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 141–174Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borrego S, Guiamet P, Gomez de Saravia S, Batistini P, Garcia M, Lavin P, Perdomo I (2010) The quality of air at archives and the biodeterioration of photographs. Biodeterior Biodegr 64:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colom X, Carrillo F, Nogués F, Garriga P (2003) Structural analysis of photodegraded wood by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Polym Degrad Stab 80:543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arja Miettinen O (2004) Trichoderma reesei strains for production of cellulases for the textile industry. FTT Publications, ESPOO, pp 53–96Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cortez J, Ellis J, Bishop D (2001) Cellulase finishing of woven, cotton fabrics in jet and winch machines. J Biotechnol 89:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hechmi N, Bosso L, El Bassi L, Scelza R, Testa A, Jedidi N, Rao MA (2016) Depletion of pentachlorophenol in soil microcosms with Byssochlamys nivea and Scopulariopsis brumptii as detoxification agents. Chemosphere 165:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romano N, Lignola GP, Brigante M, Bosso L, Chirico GB (2016) Residual life and degradation assessment of wood elements used in soil bioengineering structures for slope protection. Ecol Eng 90:498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darwish SS, EL Hadidi N, Mansour M (2013) The effect of fungal decay on Ficus sycomorus wood. Int J Conserv Sci 4:271–282Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dellavalle PD, Cabrera A, Alem D, Larrañaga P, Ferreira F, Rizza MD (2011) Antifungal activity of medicinal plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria spp. Chil J Agric Res 71:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karin Fackler K, Schwanninger M, Gradinger C, Hinterstoisser B, Messner K (2007) Qualitative and quantitative changes of beech wood degraded by wood-rotting basidiomycetes monitored by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic methods and multivariate data analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 271:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DongGu J, Kigawa R, Sato Y, Katayama Y (2013) Addressing the microbiological problems of cultural property and archive documents after earthquake and tsunami. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 58:345–346Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kavkler K, Cimerman N, Zalar P, Demšar A (2011) FTIR spectroscopy of biodegrade historical textiles. Polym Degrad Stab 96:574–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ljaljević-Grbić M, Stupar M, Vukojević J, Maričić I, Bungur N (2013) Molds in museum environments: biodeterioration of art photographs and wooden sculptures. Arch Biol Sci 65:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marin S, Homedes V, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ, Magan N (1999) Impact of Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium proliferatum colonisation of maize on calorific losses and fumonisin production under different environmental conditions. J Stored Prod Res 35:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesquita N, Portugal A, Videira S, Rodríguez-Echeverría S, Bandeira AM, Santos MJ, Freitas H (2009) Fungal diversity in ancient documents. A case study on the Archive of the University of Coimbra. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 63:626–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meynell GG, Newsam RJ (1978) Foxing, a fungal infection of paper. Nature 274:466–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morton W, Hearle J (2008) Natural-cellulose fibres. Physical properties of textile fibers, 4th edn. Woodhead Publishing, Manchester, pp 38–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nevell T (1995) Cellulose, structure, properties and behavior in the dyeing process. In: Shore J (ed) Cellulose dyeing. Society of Dyers and Colourists, pp 10–26Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaczmarek OD, Buffeteau H, Sourisseau T C (2005) Photo- and bio-degradation processes in polyethylene, cellulose and their blends studied by ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopies. J Mater Sci 40:4189–4198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    YounOh S, IlYoo D, Shin Y, Seo G (2005) FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohyd Res 3(340):417–428Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Philip RW, Bruce A, Munro A (1995) The effect of water soluble Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (bong) Carr] heartwood and sapwood extracts on the growth of selected Trichoderma species. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 35:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pinzari F, Pasquariello G, De Mico A (2006) Biodeterioration of paper: a SEM study of fungal spoilage reproduced under controlled conditions. Macromol Symp 38:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Proniewicz LM, Paluszkiewicz C, Weselucha-Birczynska A, Majcherczyk H, Bara_nski A, Konieczna A (2001) FT-IR and FT-Raman study of hydrothermally degradated cellulose. J Mol Struct 596:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Satish S, Mohana DC, Ranhavendra MP, Raveesha KA (2007) Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against important seed borne pathogens of Aspergillus sp. J Agric Technol 3:109–119Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scheerer S, Ortega-Morales O, Gaylarde C (2009) Microbial deterioration of stone monuments-an update overview. Adv Appl Microbiol 66:97–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strzelczyk AB (2004) Observations on aesthetic and structural changes induced in Polish historic objects by microorganisms. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 53:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Szczepanowska H (1986) Biodeterioration of art objects on paper. J Pap Conserv 10:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Szczepanowska H, Moomaw W (1994) Laser stain removal of fungal—induced stains from paper. J Am Inst Conserv 33:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bosso L, Lacatena F, Cristinzio G, Cea M, Diez MC, Rubilar O (2014) Biosorption of pentachlorophenol by Anthracophyllum discolor in the form of live fungal pellets. New Biotechnol 32(1):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Szczepanowska H, Cavaliere AR (2000) Fungal deterioration of 18th and 19th century documents: a case study of the Tilghman Family Collection, Wye House, Easton, Maryland. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 46:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Szostak-Kotowa J (2004) Biodeterioration of textiles. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 53:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zabel R, Morrell J (1992) Wood deterioration agents. In: Wood microbiology, decay and its prevention. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 21–51Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zotti M, Ferroni A, Calvini P (2008) Microfungal biodeterioration of historic paper: preliminary FTIR and microbiological analyses. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 62:186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zyska B (1997) Fungi isolated from library materials: a review of the literature. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 40:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cappitelli F, Sorlini C (2008) Microorganisms attack synthetic polymers in items representing our cultural heritage. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:564–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eriksson KE, Blanchettete A, Ander P (1990) Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components, Springer Series in Wood Science. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Faix O (1992) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In: Lin SY, Dence CW (eds) Methods in lignin chemistry. Springer Series in Wood Science, Springer, Berlin, pp 233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Restoration and Conservation Department, Faculty of ArchaeologyCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations