Skip to main content
Log in

Sugarcane Bagasse Paper Reinforced by Cellulose Nanofiber (CNF) and Bleached Softwood Kraft (BSWK) Pulp

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the effects of bleached softwood kraft pulp (BSWK) as a conventional reinforcing material in comparison with cellulose nanofiber (CNF) as an emerging bionanomaterial on the bleached soda sugarcane bagasse (BSSB) paper furnish. Cationic polyacrylamide was selected as a retention aid along with the CNF addition to retain it on fiber surfaces during the papermaking process. The results showed that though the effects of CNF were similar to those of BSWK in the most of properties but there were some important differences which can industrially be noticeable. In one hand, both of cellulosic elements, when substituted for the BSSB at the 5 or 10 % levels, gave increases in the paper strength, i.e. samples containing 10 % CNF yielded similar tensile strength (53 N m/g) and a more consolidated structure (14 % increment of the density) than those produced with 10 % BSWK. CNF addition had opposite effects on the air-permeability of the resulting paper. Unlike BSKW, the addition of CNF had a strong favorable effect on tear strength, but it was markedly slowed the rate of drainage time when it was especially added at 10 % level of the final furnish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taipale T, Osterberg M, Nykanen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17:1005–1020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43(1):76–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez I, Boufi S, Pelach MA, Alacala M, Vilaseca F, Mutje P (2012) Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps. BioResources 7(4):5167–5180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petroudy SRD, Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Ghasemian A, Resalati H (2014) Effects of bagasse microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyacrylamide on key properties of bagasse paper. Carbohydr Polym 99:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Korpinen RI, Fardim PE (2009) Reinforcement potential of bleached sawdust Kraft pulp in different mechanical pulp furnishes. BioResources 4(4):1572–1585

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lisson SN, Banham PW, Mendham NJ (2001) Studies of fibre hemp and flax pulps as a feedstock for Australian newsprint production. Appita J 54(5):449–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng WPQ, Lam HL, Ng FY, Kamal M, Lim JHE (2012) Waste-to-wealth: green potential from palm biomass in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 34:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petroudy SRJ, Resalati H, Rezayati Charani P (2011) Newsprint from soda bagasse pulp in admixture of hardwood CMP pulp. BioResources 6(3):2483–2491

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samariha A, Khakifirooz A (2011) Application of NSSC pulping to sugarcane bagasse. BioResources 6(3):3313–3323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheikhi P, Ghobadifar P, Rezaei-Arjomand F (2013) Investigation on characteristics of bleached bagasse pulp using neutral sulfite and soda solutions. Lignocellulose 2(2):369–376

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips RB (2000) Research and development in the pulp and paper industry year 2000 and beyond. Tappi J 83(1):42–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tyagi N, Suresh S (2015) Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: optimization & characterization. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07054

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez A, Sanchez R, Requejo A, Ferrer A (2010) Feasibility of rice straw as a raw material for the production of soda cellulose pulp. J Clean Prod 18:1084–1091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karenlampi P (1996) The effect of fiber properties on the tearing work of paper. Tappi J 79(4):211–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Farsheh AT, Firouzabadi MRD, Mahdavi S (2011) Properties of Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.,) bast fiber reinforced bagasse soda pulp in comparison to long fiber. World Appl Sci J 14(6):906–909

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seth RS (1995) Optimizing reinforcement pulp by fracture toughness. In: Process and product quality conference, pp 29–40

  18. Karenlampi P (1997) Mechanical properties of information papers: the effect of softwood Kraft pulp. In: Tappi engineering and papermakers conference, pp 365–377

  19. Salmi J (2009) Surface interactions in polyelectrolyte–cellulose systems and their implications for flocculation mechanisms. Doctoral thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Espoo

  20. Gonzalez I, Vilaseca F, Alcala M, Pelach MA, Boufi S, Mutje P (2013) Effect of the combination of biobeating and NFC on the physic-mechanical properties of paper. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9927-1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eriksen Ø, Syyerud K, Gregersen Ø (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23(3):299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J (2008) Cellulose nanofibrils adsorption with poly (amide–amine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15(2):303–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hii C, Gregersen Ø, Chinga-Carrasco G, Eriksen Ø (2012) The effect of MFC on the pressability and paper properties of TMP and GCC based sheets. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27(2):388–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hubbe MA, Heitmann JA, Cole CA (2008) Water release from fractionated stock suspensions. Part 2. Effects of consistency, flocculants, shear, and order of mixing. Tappi J 7(8):14–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khosravani A, Latibari AJ, Mirshokraei SA, Rahmaninia M, Nazhad MM (2010) Studying the effect of cationic starch-anionic nanosilica system on retention and drainage. BioResources 5(2):939–950

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vishtal A, Rousu P, Hultholm T, Turku K, Paananen P, Käyhkö J (2011) Drainage and retention enhancement of a wheat straw-containing pulp furnish using microparticle retention aids. BioResources 6(1):791–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts JC (1996) Paper chemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao L, Salmi J, Stenius P (2009) The effect of polyelectrolyte complexes on dewatering of cellulose suspension. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 24(2):148–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts JC, Au CO, Clay GA, Lough C (1986) The effect of C14-labelled cationic and native starches on dry strength and formation. Tappi J 69(10):88–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Afra E, Yousefi H, Hadilam MM, Nishino T (2013) Comparative effect of mechanical beating and nanofibrillation of cellulose on paper properties made from bagasse and softwood pulps. Carbohydr Polym 97:725–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yousefi H, Faezipour M, Nishino T, Shakeri A, Ebrahimi G (2011) All-cellulose composite and nanocomposite made from partially dissolved micro- and nanofibers of canola straw. Polym J 43:559–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leponiemi A (2008) Non-wood pulping possibilities—a challenge for the chemical pulping industry. Appita J 61(3):234–243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lehtonen LK, Dyer T (2005) Light-scattering coefficient as a measure of specific surface area in mechanical pulp laboratory sheets. Paperi Puu 87(8):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  35. Page DH (1969) A theory for the tensile strength of paper. Tappi J 52(4):674–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chinga-Carrasco G, Morseburg K (2009) Assessing the combined benefits of clay and nanofibrillated cellulose in layerd TMP-based sheets. Cellulose 16(5):759–806

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson JV (1975) A summary of reflectance equations for application of the Kubelka–Munk theory to optical properties of paper. Tappi J 58(10):152–153

    Google Scholar 

  38. McGrattan W (1990) Key characteristics of linerboard, corrugating medium, and roll stock mechanical condition and their influence on the manufacture of corrugated products, part 1. Tappi J 73(11):99–108

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wistara N, Young RA (2000) Properties and treatments of pulps from recycled paper. Part 1. Physical and chemical properties of pulps. Cellulose 6:291–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Retulainen E (1996) Fibers properties as control variables in papermaking. Part 1. Fiber properties of key importance in the network. Paperi Puu 78(4):187–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parizad Sheikhi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petroudy, S.R.D., Sheikhi, P. & Ghobadifar, P. Sugarcane Bagasse Paper Reinforced by Cellulose Nanofiber (CNF) and Bleached Softwood Kraft (BSWK) Pulp. J Polym Environ 25, 203–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0800-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0800-9

Keywords

Navigation