Abstract
Soy protein plastics are a renewable, biodegradable alternative to fossil fuel-based plastic resins. Processing of soy protein plastics using conventional methods (injection molding, extrusion) has met with some success. Viscosities of processable formulations that contain soy protein along with the necessary additives, such as glycerol and cornstarch, have not been reported, but are necessary for extrusion modeling and the design of extrusion dies. Resins consisting of soy protein isolate-cornstarch ratios of 4:1, 3:2, and 2:3 were plasticized with glycerol and soy oil, compounded in a twin screw extruder and adjusted to 10% moisture. The effects on viscosity of added sodium sulfite, a titanate coupling agent and recycling were evaluated using a screw-driven capillary rheometer at shear rates of 100–800/s. The viscosities fit a power-law model and were found to be shear thinning with power-law indices, n, of 0.18–0.46 and consistency indices, m, of 1.1 × 104–1.0 × 105. Power-law indices decreased and consistency indices increased with increasing soy protein-to-cornstarch ratio and in the absence of sodium sulfite. Addition of the titanate coupling agent resulted in increased power-law index and decreased consistency index. Viscosities at a shear rate of 400/s decreased with recycling, except for the 4:1 soy protein isolate to cornstarch formulation, which displayed evidence of wall slip. Power-law indices were unaffected by recycling. Viscosities in the tested shear rate range were comparable to polystyrene and low-density polyethylene indicating soy protein plastics are potential drop-in replacements for commodity resins on conventional plastics processing equipment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vaz CM, van Doeveren PFNM, Reis RL, Cunha AM (2003) Biomacromolecules 4:1520
Jao YC, Chen AH, Lewandowski D, Irwin WE (1978) J Food Process Eng 2:97–112
Hermansson A-M (1975) J Texture Stud 5:425–439
Luxenburg LA, Baird DG, Joseph EG (1985) Biotechnol Prog 1:33–38
Bhattacharya M, Hanna MA (1986) J Food Technol 21:167–174
Chen AH, Jao YC, Larkin JW, Goldstein WE (1978) J Food Process Eng 2:337–342
Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1991) Int J Food Sci Technol 26:567–574
Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1993) J Food Eng 18:1–11
Morgan RG, Steffe JF, Ofoli RY (1989) J Food Process Eng 11:55–78
Fujio Y, Hayashi N, Hayakawa I (1991) Int J Food Sci Technol 26:45–51
Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1992) Int J Food Sci Technol 27:565–571
Hayashi N, Noma K, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1992) Int J Food Sci Technol 27:297–304
D5422-03 (2003) Standard test method for measurement of properties of thermoplastic materials by screw-extrusion capillary rheometer. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp 137–143
Giriprasath G, Jerrim L, Long M, Ogale AA (2004) Annual technical conference—ANTEC, conference proceedings. Society of Plastics Engineers, Chicago, IL, USA
Zhang J, Mungara P, Jane J (2001) Polymer 42:2569
Huang HC, Chang TC, Jane J (1999) J Am Oil Chem Soc 76:1101–1108
Otaigbe JU, Goel H, Babcock T, Jane J (1999) J Elastomers Plastics 31:56–71
ASTM (2004) D1238 Standard test method for melt flow rates of thermoplastics by extrusion plastometer
Bagley EB (1957) J Appl Phys 28:624–657
Osswald TA, Menges G (2003) Materials science of polymers for engineers. Hanser, Munich
Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1990) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors thank USDA Forest Product Laboratory (Madison, WI) for use of their facilities and equipment, Kenrich Petrochemicals for their material donation, and Sam Reitinger and Evan Ziolkowski for their technical assistance. B. E. Ralston acknowledges financial support from the United Soybean Board and the 3M Foundation Science and Technology Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ralston, B.E., Osswald, T.A. Viscosity of Soy Protein Plastics Determined by Screw-Driven Capillary Rheometry. J Polym Environ 16, 169–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0098-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0098-3