Skip to main content
Log in

Viscosity of Soy Protein Plastics Determined by Screw-Driven Capillary Rheometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soy protein plastics are a renewable, biodegradable alternative to fossil fuel-based plastic resins. Processing of soy protein plastics using conventional methods (injection molding, extrusion) has met with some success. Viscosities of processable formulations that contain soy protein along with the necessary additives, such as glycerol and cornstarch, have not been reported, but are necessary for extrusion modeling and the design of extrusion dies. Resins consisting of soy protein isolate-cornstarch ratios of 4:1, 3:2, and 2:3 were plasticized with glycerol and soy oil, compounded in a twin screw extruder and adjusted to 10% moisture. The effects on viscosity of added sodium sulfite, a titanate coupling agent and recycling were evaluated using a screw-driven capillary rheometer at shear rates of 100–800/s. The viscosities fit a power-law model and were found to be shear thinning with power-law indices, n, of 0.18–0.46 and consistency indices, m, of 1.1 × 104–1.0 × 105. Power-law indices decreased and consistency indices increased with increasing soy protein-to-cornstarch ratio and in the absence of sodium sulfite. Addition of the titanate coupling agent resulted in increased power-law index and decreased consistency index. Viscosities at a shear rate of 400/s decreased with recycling, except for the 4:1 soy protein isolate to cornstarch formulation, which displayed evidence of wall slip. Power-law indices were unaffected by recycling. Viscosities in the tested shear rate range were comparable to polystyrene and low-density polyethylene indicating soy protein plastics are potential drop-in replacements for commodity resins on conventional plastics processing equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaz CM, van Doeveren PFNM, Reis RL, Cunha AM (2003) Biomacromolecules 4:1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jao YC, Chen AH, Lewandowski D, Irwin WE (1978) J Food Process Eng 2:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermansson A-M (1975) J Texture Stud 5:425–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luxenburg LA, Baird DG, Joseph EG (1985) Biotechnol Prog 1:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya M, Hanna MA (1986) J Food Technol 21:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen AH, Jao YC, Larkin JW, Goldstein WE (1978) J Food Process Eng 2:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1991) Int J Food Sci Technol 26:567–574

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1993) J Food Eng 18:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan RG, Steffe JF, Ofoli RY (1989) J Food Process Eng 11:55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujio Y, Hayashi N, Hayakawa I (1991) Int J Food Sci Technol 26:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi N, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1992) Int J Food Sci Technol 27:565–571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi N, Noma K, Hayakawa I, Fujio Y (1992) Int J Food Sci Technol 27:297–304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D5422-03 (2003) Standard test method for measurement of properties of thermoplastic materials by screw-extrusion capillary rheometer. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp 137–143

  14. Giriprasath G, Jerrim L, Long M, Ogale AA (2004) Annual technical conference—ANTEC, conference proceedings. Society of Plastics Engineers, Chicago, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, Mungara P, Jane J (2001) Polymer 42:2569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang HC, Chang TC, Jane J (1999) J Am Oil Chem Soc 76:1101–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Otaigbe JU, Goel H, Babcock T, Jane J (1999) J Elastomers Plastics 31:56–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM (2004) D1238 Standard test method for melt flow rates of thermoplastics by extrusion plastometer

  19. Bagley EB (1957) J Appl Phys 28:624–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Osswald TA, Menges G (2003) Materials science of polymers for engineers. Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1990) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank USDA Forest Product Laboratory (Madison, WI) for use of their facilities and equipment, Kenrich Petrochemicals for their material donation, and Sam Reitinger and Evan Ziolkowski for their technical assistance. B. E. Ralston acknowledges financial support from the United Soybean Board and the 3M Foundation Science and Technology Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. E. Ralston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ralston, B.E., Osswald, T.A. Viscosity of Soy Protein Plastics Determined by Screw-Driven Capillary Rheometry. J Polym Environ 16, 169–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0098-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0098-3

Keywords

Navigation