Biodegradation of Agricultural Plastic Films: A Critical Review


The growing use of plastics in agriculture has enabled farmers to increase their crop production. One major drawback of most polymers used in agriculture is the problem with their disposal, following their useful life-time. Non-degradable polymers, being resistive to degradation (depending on the polymer, additives, conditions etc) tend to accumulate as plastic waste, creating a serious problem of plastic waste management. In cases such plastic waste ends-up in landfills or it is buried in soil, questions are raised about their possible effects on the environment, whether they biodegrade at all, and if they do, what is the rate of (bio?)degradation and what effect the products of (bio?)degradation have on the environment, including the effects of the additives used. Possible degradation of agricultural plastic waste should not result in contamination of the soil and pollution of the environment (including aesthetic pollution or problems with the agricultural products safety). Ideally, a degradable polymer should be fully biodegradable leaving no harmful substances in the environment. Most experts and acceptable standards define a fully biodegradable polymer as a polymer that is completely converted by microorganisms to carbon dioxide, water, mineral and biomass, with no negative environmental impact or ecotoxicity. However, part of the ongoing debate concerns the question of what is an acceptable period of time for the biodegradation to occur and how this is measured. Many polymers that are claimed to be ‘biodegradable’ are in fact ‘bioerodable’, ‘hydrobiodegradable’, ‘photodegradable’, controlled degradable or just partially biodegradable. This review paper attempts to delineate the definition of degradability of polymers used in agriculture. Emphasis is placed on the controversial issues regarding biodegradability of some of these polymers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Both humate and humic refer back to organic compounds found in the soil. Humate generally refers to compounds that are generated by the breakdown of plants and animals. Humic generally refers to either one of the organic acids found in soil resulting from the degradation of organic material, or it can refer to the organic layer itself found in many soils. The humic layer in a soil generally appears as a rich, dark earthy layer that is usually found in the upper portions of a soil profile

  2. 2.

    Classification based on work performed for the Australian Department of Environment and Heritage by Nolan-ITU.

  3. 3.

    A sink is a reservoir that uptakes a chemical element or compound from another part of its cycle. For example, soil and trees tend to act as natural sinks for carbon—each year hundreds of billions of tons of carbon in the form of CO2 are absorbed by oceans, soils, and trees.


  1. 1.

    Chandra R, Rustgi R (1998) Program Polym Sci 23:1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chiellini E, Corti A, Swift G (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 81:341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

  4. 4.

    Bohlmann G, Toki G (2004) Chemical economics handbook, SRI International ed.

  5. 5.

    Vert M, Dos Santos I, Ponsart St, Alauzet N, Morgat J-L, Coudane J, Garreau H (2002) Polym Int 51:840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

  7. 7.

  8. 8.

    Albertsson AC, Barnstedt C, Karlsson S (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 51:1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

  10. 10.

    Espi E, Salmeron A, Fontecha A, Garcia Y, Real AI (2006) J Plast Film Sheet 22:85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jouet JP (2001) Plasticulture 120:46

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dilara PA, Briassoulis D (2000) J Agr Eng Res 76:309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Briassoulis D (2005) Polym Degrad Stabil 88:489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Griffin GJL (1994) Chemistry and technology of biodegradable polymers. Blackie Academic Professional, Chapman & Hall

  15. 15.

    Scott G (1975) Polym Age 6:54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Scott G, Wiles DM (2001) Biomacromolecules 2(3):615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Scott G (2000) Polym Degrad Stabil 68:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stevens ES (2002) Biocycle 43(12):42

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jakubowicz I (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 80:39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Karlsson S, Hakkarainen M, Albertsson A-C (1997) Macromolecules 30:7721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wackett L, Hershberger DC (2001) Biocatalysis and biodegradation. Microbial transformation of organic compounds. ASM Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Barak L, Coquest Y, Halbach TR, Molina JAE (1991) J Environ Qual 20:173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schmitt J, Flemming H-C (1998) Int Biodeter Biodegr 41:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Albertsson A-C, Karlsson S (1988) J Appl Polymer Sci 35:1289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Albertsson A-C, Karlsson S (1990) Prog Polym Sci 15:177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Albertsson A-C, Barenstedt C, Karlsson S, Lindberg T (1995) Polymer 36:3075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Billingham NC, Bonora M, De Corte D (2004) Environmentally degradable plastics based on oxodegradation of conventional polyolefins. Plastics Solutions Canada Inc.

  28. 28.

    Liu M, Horrocks AR (2002) Polym Degrad Stabil 75:485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ohtake Y, Kobayashi T, Asabe H, Murakami N (1998) Polym Degrad Stabil 60:79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ohtake Y, Kobayashi T, Asabe H, Murakami N, Ono K (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:1643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Orhan Y, Hrenovic J, Buyukgungor H (2004) Acta Chim Slov 51:578

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Stevens ES (2002) Green plastics: an introduction to the new science of biodegradable plastics. Princeton University Press

  33. 33.

    Broska R, Rychly J (2001) Polym Degrad Stabil 72:271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Karlsson S, Albertsson AC (1998) Polym Eng Sci 38(8):1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Goldstein N, Block D (2000) Biocycle J Compost Organ Recycl 41(8):40

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Martin A (1994) Biodegradation and bioremediation. Academic Press Inc

  37. 37.

    Narayan R (1994) Proceedings: Third International Scientific Workshop on Biodegradable Plastics and Polymers; Osaka, Japan, Nov 9–11, 1993, Impact of Governmental Policies, Regulations, and Standards Activities on an Emerging Biodegradable Plastics Industry. In: Doi Y, Fukuda K (eds) Biodegradable plastics and polymers. Elsevier, New York, pp 261

  38. 38.

    Demicheli M (1996) Biodegradable plastics from renewable sources. IPTS Report, 10

  39. 39.

    Guides for the use of environmental marketing claims, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Washington D.C., July, 1992

  40. 40.

    Khabbaz F, Albertsson A-C, Karlsson S (1999) Polym Degrad Stabil 63:127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kitch D (2001) Biocycle J Compost Organ Recycl 42(2):74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Agamuthu P, Putri Nadzrul Faizura (2005) Waste Manage Res 23:95

  43. 43.

    Albertsson A-C (1980) Eur Polym J 16:623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Narayan R (1992) ACS Symp Ser 476

  45. 45.

    Rabek J (1996) Photodegradation of polymers – physical characteristics and application. Springer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pospısil J, Pilar J, Billingham NC, Marek A, Horak Z, Nespurek S (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Biodegradable Plastics (2002) – Developments and Environmental Impacts, Nolan-ITU Pty Ltd, Prepared in association with ExcelPlas Australia, October, 2002

  48. 48.

    Biron M (2005) Collateral effects of additives, Part 2 – Unexpected and surprising effects of specific additives, SpecialChem

  49. 49.

    Biron M (2005) The additives for thermoplastics: a review III – Specific property enhancement, SpecialChem

  50. 50.

    Erlandsson B, Karlsson S, Albertsson A-C (1997) Polym Degrad Stabil 56:237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Szaraz L, Beczner J, Kayser G (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 81:477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Matsunaga M, Whitney PJ (2000) Polym Degrad Stabil 70:325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Narayan R (2000) Proceedings of the ICS-UNIDO International Workshop, Environmental Degradable Plastic: Industrial Development and Application. Biodegradable plastic for sustainable technology development & evolving worldwide standards. Seoul, Korea, pp. 24–38. Korean Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Chongryang, Seoul

  54. 54.

    Krzan A, Hemjinda S, Miertus S, Corti A, Chiellini E (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:2819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Keller D, Environmentally Degradable Plastics (2006) Plastic Shipping Container Institute presentation, Lyondell Inc

  56. 56.

  57. 57.

    Krisada D (2006) Workshop on Development of Environmentally Degradable Plastics From Renewable Resources in Thailand. Inno BioPlast 2006, Bangkok, Thailand

  58. 58.

    Baciu R, Swift G (2006) Synthetic polymers that environmentally degrade by a combination of abiotic and biotic processes, BEPS/SPI, Chicago, June 2006

  59. 59.

    Weiland M, Daro A, David C (1995) Polym Degrad Stabil 48:275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Environmental and Plastic Industry Council (2000) Biodegradable Polymers, Technical Review

  61. 61.

    Bonhomme S, Cuer A, Delort A-M, Lemaire J, Sancelme M, Scott G (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 81:441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Calmon-Decriaud A, Bellon-Maurel V, Silvestre F (1998) Adv Polym Sci 135:207

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Fritz J, Link U, Braun R (2001) Starke/Starch 53(3–4):105

  64. 64.

    Hoffmann J et al (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 79:511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Nakamura EM, Cordi L, Almeida GSG, Duran N, Mei LHI (2005) J Mater Process Technol 162–163:236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Gomes ME, Reis RL (2004) Int Mater Rev 49(5):261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Arnaud R, Dabin P, Lemaire J, Al-Malaika S, Chohan S, Coker M (1994) Polym Degrad Stabil 46(2):211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Garthe JW, Kowal PD (2002) The chemical composition of degradable plastics. Agricultural and Biological Engineering, PENNSTATE University.

  69. 69.

    Briassoulis D (2004) J Polym Environ 12(2):65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bastioli C (ed) (2005) Starch-based technology – Handbook of biodegradable polymers. Rapra Technology

  71. 71.

    Mohanty K, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Macromol Mater Eng 276–277(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Richard RA, Kalra B (2002) Science 297(5582):803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Shogren R, Biodegradable Mulch Films, USDA ARS NCAUR Technologies for Transfer, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research (

  74. 74.

    Enivronmental product declaration (EPD) Mater-Bi PE type: Biodegradable plastic pellet for foams, Novamont Inc.

  75. 75.

    Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Schettini E, Vox G (2004) Biosyst Eng 87(4):479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Tocchetto RS, Benson RS, Dever M (2001) J Polym Environ 9(2):57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Otey FH (1976) Polym Plast Technol Eng 7:221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Westhoff RP, Otey RH, Mehltretter CL, Russell CR (1974) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 13(2):123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Fernando WC, Suyama K, Itoh K, Tanaka H, Yamamoto H (2002) Soil Sci Plant Nutr 48(5):701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Patel M (2001) Review of life cycle assessments for bioplastic. Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kurdikar D, Fournet L, Slater S, Paster M, Gruys K, Gerngross T, Coulon R (2001) J Industr Ecol 4(3):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Halley P, Rutgers R, Coombs S, Christie G, Lonergan G (2001) Starch-Starke 53(8):362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Gerngross T (1999) Nat Biotechnol 17:541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

  85. 85.

  86. 86.

    Leonardo Da Vinci Programme (2000) Environmentally degradable plastics, CONTRACT No: I/98/2/05261/PI/II.1.1.b/CONT, Final Report

  87. 87.

    El-Rehim Abd, El-Sayed HA, Hegazy A, Ali AM, Rabie AM (2004) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 163:547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

  89. 89.

    Hurd CD, Blunck FH (1983) J Am Chem Soc 60:2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Martelé Y, van Speybroeck V, Waroquier M, Schach E (2002) e-Polymers 049

  91. 91.

    Feuilloley P, Cesar Guy G, Benguigui L, Grohens Y, Pillin I, Bewa H, Lefaux S, Mounia J (2005) J Polym Environ 13(4):349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

  93. 93.

    Blanco A (2002) Plast Eng 58(10):6

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Leaversuch R (2002) Plast Technol 48(9):66

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Albertsson A-C, Karlsson S (1987) Polym Degrad Stabil 18:73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Hadad D, Geresh S, Sivan A (2005) J Appl Microbiol 98:1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ohtake Y, Kobayashi T, Asabe H, Murakami N (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 56:1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Stapleton RD, Savage DC, Sayler GS, Stacey G (1998) Appl Environ Microbiol 64(11):4180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Gulmine JV, Janissel PR, Heise HM, Akcelrud L (2003) Polym Degrad Stabil 79:385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Morancho JM, Ramis X, Fernandez X, Cadenato A, Salla JM, Valles A, Contat L, Ribes A (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Technical Report (2003) Additives to make conventional polymers degradable, SpecialChem

  102. 102.

    Gorghium LM, Jipa S, Zaharescu T, Setnescu R, Mihalcea I (2004) Polym Degrad Stabil 84:7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Orhan Y, Buyukgungor H (2000) Int Biodeter Biodegr 45:49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Orhan Y, Hrenovic J, Buyukgungor H (2004) Acta Chim Slov 51:578

    Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Chiellini E, Corti A, D’Antone S, Baciu R (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:2739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Pandey JK, Singh RP (2001) Biomacromolecules 2:880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Manzur A, Limon-Gonzalez M, Favela-Torres E (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

  109. 109.

    Wiles D, Scott G (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:1581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Technical guides and websites CIBA, EPG, VTT, TISTR

  111. 111.

    Weng Yunxuan, The status of biodegradable plastics in China,

  112. 112.

  113. 113.

  114. 114.

  115. 115.

  116. 116.

  117. 117.

  118. 118.

    Briassoulis D (2005) Polym Degrad Stabil 88:489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Gourdon R (2002) Aide A La Definition Des Dechets Dits Biodegradables, Fermentescibles, Methanisables, Compostables, Rapport Final, Re.Co.R.D. Etude No. 00-0118/1a, Février

  120. 120.

    Harold S (1993) Biodegradability: review of the current situation, Lubrizol Corporation

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetres Briassoulis.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at



Definitions of Degradation Processes

Ageing: the process of growing old or developing the appearance and characteristics of old age; the change of properties that occurs in a material as a result of degradation (whether degradation is due to one factor or is due to the combined action of several factors) [118].

Biodegradation: degradation that is caused by biological activity, especially by enzymatic action, (ISO/CD 16929).

Biodegradation phase: the time in days from the end of the lag phase of a test until about 90% of the maximum level of biodegradation has been reached (ISO/DIS 17556).

Degradation: an irreversible process leading to a significant change of the structure of a material, typically characterized by a loss of properties (e.g. integrity, molecular weight, structure or mechanical strength) and/or fragmentation. Degradation is affected by environmental conditions and proceeds over a period of time comprising one or more steps (ASTM D-6400.99) [6].

Disintegration: The falling apart into very small fragments caused by degradation mechanisms (ASTM D-6400.99) [6].

Lag phase: the time required in days for adaptation and selection of the degrading micro-organisms to be achieved and the biodegradation degree of a chemical compound or organic matter has reached 105 of the theoretical maximum biodegradation derived form the theoretical amount of evolved carbon dioxide and theoretical oxygen demand (ISO/DIS 17556).

Maximum level of biodegradation: the maximum biodegradation in percent a chemical compound or organic matter achieves in a test, above which no further biodegradation takes place (ISO/DIS 17556).

Natural ageing: a standardized artificial process for imparting the characteristics and properties of age [118].

Plateau phase: The times form the end of the biodegradation phase (maximum level of biodegradation) until the end of the test (ISO/DIS 17556).

Primary Biodegradation is the alteration in the chemical structure of a substance, brought about by biological action, resulting in the loss of a specific property of that substance (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Primary Biodegradation: Minimal transformation that alters the physical characteristics of a compound while leaving the molecule largely intact. Partial biodegradation is not necessarily a desirable property, since the intermediary metabolites formed can be more toxic than the original substrate. Therefore, mineralization is the preferred aim (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Theoretical amount of evolved carbon dioxide: the maximum theoretical amount of carbon dioxide evolve after completely oxidizing a chemical compound calculated from the molecular formula; expressed as mg carbon dioxide evolved per mg or g test compound (ISO/DIS 17556).

Theoretical oxygen demand: the maximum theoretical amount of oxygen required to oxidize a chemical compound completely calculated from the molecular formula; expressed as mg oxygen required per mg or g test compound (ISO/DIS 17556).

Ultimate biodegradation (aerobic) is the level of degradation achieved when the test compound is totally utilized by microorganisms resulting in the production of carbon dioxide, water, mineral salts, and new microbial cellular constituents (biomass) (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Ultimate Biodegradation (Complete biodegradation): Molecular cleavage must be sufficiently extensive to remove biological, toxicological, chemical and physical properties associated with the use of the original product, eventually forming carbon dioxide and water (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Ultimate biodegradation: degradation achieved when a material is totally utilized by microorganisms resulting in the production of carbon dioxide (and possibly methane in the case of anaerobic biodegradation), water, inorganic compounds, and new microbial cellular constituents (biomass or secretions or both) (ASTM D-6046.02) [6].

Weathering: the natural process under real conditions imparting the characteristics and properties of age [118].

Definitions of Materials Undergoing Various Degradation Processes

Biodegradable material: a material that has the proven capability to decompose in the most common environment where the material is disposed of within 3 years through natural biological processes into non-toxic carbonaceous soil, water, carbon dioxide or methane [120]. Biodegradation is measured according to the ASTM defined standards [6].

Biodegradable material: a material for which the biodegradation process is sufficient to mineralise organic matter into carbon dioxide or methane respectively, water and biomass (ISO/CD 16929).

Biodegradable plastic: a degradable plastic in which the degradation results from the action of naturally occurring microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and algae (ASTM D-6400.99), (ASTM D-2096.01) [6].

Biopolymer: a material that is partially comprised of natural starch additives with the characteristics of a plastic product (ASTM D-6400.99) [6].

Compostable material: a material that is biodegradable under composting conditions (ISO/CD 16929).

Compostable plastic: a plastic that undergoes degradation by biological processes during composting to yield CO2, water, inorganic compounds, and biomass at a rate consistent with other known compostable materials and leave no visible, distinguishable or toxic residue (ASTM D-6400.99), (ASTM D-2096.04) [6].

Compostable plastic: plastic capable of undergoing biological decomposition in a compost site as part of an available program, such that the material is not visually distinguishable and breaks down into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic compounds, and biomass, at a rate consistent with known compostable materials (ASTM D-6002) [6].

Degradable plastic: a plastic designed to undergo a significant change in its chemical structure under specific environmental conditions, resulting in a loss of some properties that may vary as measured by standard test methods appropriate to it (ASTM D-6400.99) [6].

Degradable plastic: a plastic designed to undergo a significant change in it is chemical structure under specific environmental conditions resulting in a loss of some properties that may vary as measured by standard test methods appropriate to the plastic and the application in a period of time that determines its classification (ASTM D-2096.01) [6].

Degradable: A material is called degradable with respect to specific environmental conditions if it undergoes degradation to a specific extent within a given time measured by specific standard test methods (ASTM D-6400.99) [6].

Hydrolytically degradable plastic: a degradable plastic in which the degradation results from hydrolysis (ASTM D-2096.03) [6].

Inherently biodegradable: is a classification of chemicals for which there is unequivocal evidence of biodegradation (primary or ultimate) in a standard test of biodegradability. Requires “worst possible case” estimates of likely environmental concentrations and therefore further simulation tests may be required (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Non-biodegradable: Negligible (as compared to inherently biodegradable) biotic removal of material under standard test conditions (EPA OPPTS 835.3110)

Oxidatively degradable plastic: a degradable plastic in which degradation results from oxidation (ASTM D-2096.03) [6].

Readily biodegradable is an arbitrary classification of chemicals which have passed certain specified screening tests for ultimate biodegradability; these tests are so stringent that it is assumed that such compounds will rapidly and completely biodegrade in aquatic environments under aerobic conditions (EPA OPPTS 835.3110).

Readily biodegradable: Rapid and complete mineralization (EPA OPPTS 835.3110)

Photodegradable plastic: a degradable plastic in which degradation results from the action of natural daylight UV radiation (solar weight lengths). (ASTM D-2096.02) [6].

Partially biodegradable: Blends of non-biodegradable polymers with biodegradable (usually starch) material. Biodegradation of these materials is limited to the accessible by the micro-organisms part of the biodegradable compound [6].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyrikou, I., Briassoulis, D. Biodegradation of Agricultural Plastic Films: A Critical Review. J Polym Environ 15, 125–150 (2007).

Download citation


  • Degradation
  • Biodegradation
  • Mulching films
  • Agriculture
  • Polymers