Skip to main content
Log in

Configuration Tool for a Wireless Sensor Network Integrated Security Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) will benefit from security frameworks that provide easy to use security while hiding inherent complexity. In comparison to traditional networks, the hardware constraints of wireless sensors demand that network security be configured based on application parameters, in order to provide the desired level of security while efficiently using available resources. Such a security framework is discussed in this paper, with special focus on security configuration, where a configuration methodology is presented in detail. The methodology is implemented as a Java tool with SQLite database backing, and to prove its validity, a sample application is presented and tested. Also, experimental proofs are provided to support the methodology, and the general necessity of configuring security for WSN applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu, S., Setia, S., and Jajodia, S.: LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks. In: CCS ’03: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 62–72. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003)

  2. Prasad, N.R., Alam, M.: Security framework for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 37, 455–469 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Law, Y.W., Havinga, P.J.M.: How to secure a wireless sensor network. Intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing conference, 2005. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Dec., pp. 89–95 (2005)

  4. Ransom, S., Pfisterer, D., Fischer, S.: Comprehensible security synthesis for wireless sensor networks. In: MidSens ’08: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Middleware for Sensor Networks, pp. 19–24. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008)

  5. Peter, S., Piotrowski, K., Langendorfer, P.: In-network-aggregation as case study for a support tool reducing the complexity of designing secure wireless sensor networks. In: Local Computer Networks, 2008. LCN 2008. 33rd IEEE Conference on, pp. 778–785 (2008)

  6. Jinwala, D., Patel, D., Dasgupta, K.: Configurable link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. J. Inform. Assur. Sec. 4(4), 582–603 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Oliveira, S., de Oliveira, T.R., Nogueira, J.M.: A policy based security management architecture for sensor networks. In: Integrated Network Management, 2009. IM’09. IFIP/IEEE International Symposium, pp. 315–318 (2009)

  8. Krontiris, I., Dimitriou, T., Soroush, H., Salajegheh, M.: WSN link-layer security frameworks. In: Lopez, J., Zhou, J. (eds.) Wireless Sensor Network Security, Chap. 6, pp. 142–163. IOS Press (2008)

  9. Carman, D.W., Kruus, P.S., Matt, B.J.: Constraints and approaches for distributed sensor network security (final). DARPA Project report (cryptographic technologies group, trusted information system, NAI Labs) (2000)

  10. Karlof, C., Sastry, N., Wagner, D.: TinySec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. In: SenSys ’04: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 162–175. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004)

  11. Luk, M., Mezzour, G., Perrig, A., Gligor, V.: MiniSec: a secure sensor network communication architecture. In: IPSN ’07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 479–488. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)

  12. Singh, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V.: Analysis of proposed key establishment protocols in multi–tiered sensor networks. J. Netw. 3, 13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Camtepe, S.A., Yener, B.: Key distribution mechanisms for wireless sensor networks: a survey, pp. 05–07. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York (2005) (technical report)

  14. Chipcon, CC2420 datasheet rev 1.2. Tech. rep. (2004)

  15. Hu, W., Corke, P., Shih, W., Overs, L.: secfleck: A public key technology platform for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensor Networks Book Series. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5432, pp. 296–311. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2009). ISBN: 978-3-642-00223-6

  16. Becher, E., Benenson, Z., Dornseif, M.: Tampering with motes: real-world physical attacks on wireless sensor networks. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing (SPC), pp. 104–118 (2006)

  17. Karlof, C., Wagner, D.: Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: attacks and countermeasures. In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, Anchorage, Alaska, pp. 113–127 (2003)

  18. Perrig, A., Szewczyk, R., Tygar, J.D., Wen, V., Culler, D.E.: SPINS: security protocols for sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 8, 521–534 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, A., Ning, P.: TinyECC: A configurable library for elliptic curve cryptography in wireless sensor networks. In: Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2008. IPSN ’08. International Conference, pp. 245–256 (2008)

  20. Gupta, V., Millard, M., Fung, S., Zhu, Y., Gura, N., Eberle, H., Shantz, S. C.: Sizzle: a standards-based end-to-end security architecture for the embedded internet. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2005. PerCom 2005. Third IEEE International Conference, pp. 247–256 (8–12 March 2005)

  21. Eschenauer, L., Gligor, V.D.: A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks. In: CCS ’02: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 41–47. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2002)

  22. Chan, H., Perrig, A., Song, D.: Random key predistribution schemes for sensor networks. In: SP ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, p. 197. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2003)

  23. Liu, D., Ning, P.: Establishing pairwise keys in distributed sensor networks. In: CCS ’03: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 52–61. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003)

  24. ZigBee Alliance, Zigbee specification v1.0 (2004)

  25. Law, L., Menezes, A., Qu, M., Solinas, J., Vanstone, S.: An efficient protocol for authenticated key agreement. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 28(2), 119–134 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, J., Jacob, J.: A survey of authentication protocol literature. http://cs.york.ac.uk/jac/papers/drareview.ps.gz (1997)

  27. OpenSSL website. http://www.openssl.org/

  28. Law, Y.W., Doumen, J., Hartel, P.: Survey and benchmark of block ciphers for wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw 2, 65–93 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levis, P., Gay, D., Handziski, V., Hauer, J.-H., Greenstein, B., Turon, M., Hui, J., Klues, K., Sharp, C., Szewczyk, R., Polastre, J., Buonadonna, P., Nachman, L., Tolle, G., Culler, D., Wolisz, A.: Berlin, Technische Universität, Crossbow Inc., Arched Rock Corporation, T2: A second generation OS for embedded sensor networks. Tech. rep. (2005)

  30. Realtime Technologies LTD, Shimmer—wireless sensor platform. http://www.shimmer-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Shimmer-2R-Capabilities-Overview.pdf (2010)

  31. Dishongh, T.J., McGrath, M.: Wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications, chap. 7. Artech House Publishers (2010)

  32. Burrows, M., Needham, R.: A logic of authentication. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 8, 18–36 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De Decker, B., Piessens, F.: Cryptolog: a theorem prover for cryptographic protocols. In; DIMACS Workshop on Design and Formal Verification of Security Protocols, Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA, September (1997)

  34. Thouvenin, R.: Implementing and Evaluating the Dynamic Manet On-demand Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks. Master’s thesis, University of Aarhaus (2007)

  35. Ganesan, D., Krishnamachari, B., Woo, A., Culler, D., Estrin, D., Wicker, S.: Complex behavior at scale: an experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. UCLA Computer Science Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013 (2002)

  36. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), Special publication 800-57 part1. Tech. rep. (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the following for their financial support: the Embark Initiative and Intel, who fund this research through the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (IRCSET) postgraduate Research Scholarship Scheme. Also, many thanks go to the anonymous reviewers for their most valuable comments that helped complete this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Cionca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cionca, V., Newe, T. & Dădârlat, V.T. Configuration Tool for a Wireless Sensor Network Integrated Security Framework. J Netw Syst Manage 20, 417–452 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-011-9219-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-011-9219-8

Keywords

Navigation