Abstract
In testing of structural components by the acoustic emission method, the requirement arises for quantitative prediction of the probability of detection (PoD) of an acoustic emission signal. Motivated similar as for other nondestructive testing methods, the suitability of given experimental settings to reach a certain likelihood of not missing relevant signals should be predicted. In contrast to other nondestructive testing methods, two of the key factors are not only the equipment and the inspector, but also the variability of the acoustic emission sources and the attenuation effects. As the strength of crack-based acoustic emission sources cannot be changed arbitrarily in the experiment, their characteristic amplitude distribution is accounted for by generation of reference datasets in small laboratory scale specimens. This assumes datasets with 100% PoD for those signals at a particular propagation distance. The prediction of the resulting PoD at another distance in a structure is achieved by means of amplitude reduction based on the measured attenuation values. For the latter, approaches using constant attenuation factors and attenuation mapping approaches are evaluated and compared to an experimental assessment of the PoD values using artificial test sources. Based on the agreement of calculated and measured PoD values, the presented approach appears promising to predict PoD values in geometrically and acoustically complex structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Georgiou, G.A.: Probability of Detection (PoD) Curves Derivation, applications and limitations. Jacobi Consulting Limited, London (2006)
Mike Suits: NASA-STD-5009 Nondestructive Evaluation Requirements for Fracture Critical Metallic Components (2008)
Sause, M., Hamstad, M.: Acoustic emission analysis. In: Beaumont, P.W.R., Zweben, C.H. (eds.) Comprehensive Composite Materials II, pp. 291–326. Elsevier, Oxford (2018)
Sause, M.G.R., Haider, F., Horn, S.: Quantification of metallic coating failure on carbon fiber reinforced plastics using acoustic emission. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 300–308 (2009)
Hamstad, M.A., O’Gallagher, A., Gary, J.: A wavelet transform applied to acoustic emission signals: Part 1: source identification. J. Acoust. Emiss. 20, 39–61 (2002)
Hamstad, M.A., O’Gallagher, A., Gary, J.: A wavelet transform applied to acoustic emission signals: Part 2: source location. J. Acoust. Emiss. 20, 62–82 (2002)
Pollock, A.: Probability of detection for acoustic emission. J. Acoust. Emiss. 25, 167–172 (2007)
Pollock, A.A.: A PoD model for acoustic emission—discussion and status. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) AIP Conference Proceedings 1211. pp. 1927–1933 (2010)
Sause, M.G.R.: In Situ Monitoring of Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)
Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M.: Acoustic Emission Testing. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Sause, M.G.R., Richler, S.: Finite element modelling of cracks as acoustic emission sources. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 34, 4 (2015)
Cuadra, J., Vanniamparambil, P.A., Servansky, D., Bartoli, I., Kontsos, A.: Acoustic emission source modeling using a data-driven approach. J. Sound Vib. 341, 222–236 (2015)
Cuadra, J.A., Baxevanakis, K.P., Mazzotti, M., Bartoli, I., Kontsos, A.: Energy dissipation via acoustic emission in ductile crack initiation. Int. J. Fract. 199, 89–104 (2016)
Kharrat, M., Ramasso, E., Placet, V., Boubakar, L.: Acoustic emission in composite materials under fatigue tests?: Effect of signal- denoising input parameters on the hits detection and data clustering. In: 31st Conference of the European Working Group on Acoustic Emission, Dresden, Germany, pp. 1–8 (2014)
Hamstad, M.A., O’Gallagher, A., Gary, J.: Effects of lateral plate dimensions on acoustic emission signals from dipole sources. J. Acoust. Emiss. 19, 258–274 (2001)
Kalafat, S., Sause, M.G.R.: Acoustic emission source localization by artificial neural networks. Struct. Heal. Monit. 14, 633–647 (2015)
Sause, M.G.R., Müller, T., Horoschenkoff, A., Horn, S.: Quantification of failure mechanisms in mode-I loading of fiber reinforced plastics utilizing acoustic emission analysis. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 167–174 (2012)
Sause, M.G.R., Gribov, A., Unwin, A.R., Horn, S.: Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33, 17–23 (2012)
Sause, M.G.R., Hamstad, M.A., Horn, S.: Finite element modeling of conical acoustic emission sensors and corresponding experiments. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 184, 64–71 (2012)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Marvin A. Hamstad for the fruitful discussion of the presented approach and Andreea-Manuela Zelenyak for implementing the first steps of this PoD model as well as Philipp Potstada for the scientific discussion of the PoD measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sause, M.G.R., Linscheid, F.F. & Wiehler, M. An Experimentally Accessible Probability of Detection Model for Acoustic Emission Measurements. J Nondestruct Eval 37, 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0474-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0474-4