Skip to main content
Log in

Defect Detection Improvement of Digitised Radiographs by Principal Component Analysis with Local Pixel Grouping

  • Published:
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiographic inspection is one of the most important techniques among non-destructive testing methods. Radiographic images are often very noisy and the image quality and the interpreter’s experience can affect the inspection of radiographs and their evaluation. In this research, principal component analysis (PCA) with local pixel grouping (LPG) algorithms was used for image enhancement for radiograph image interpretation. In this method, a pixel and its neighbors are considered as a vector variable for preservation of radiography image local structure. This method is a statistical method that uses an orthogonal property to transform and convert a set of observations of possibly correlated variables into a set of values of uncorrelated variables. Here, the PCA-LPG denoising algorithm has been applied to radiographic images with different defects to obtain denoised images. The results show that the contrast of denoised radiography images is better than the original image and the defects are much clearer. Also, the evaluation of the image quality enhancement show the contrast to noise level increases almost two times by the proposed PCA-LPG method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore, P.O. (ed.): Nondestructive Testing Handbook. Radiographic Testing, vol. 4, 3rd edn. American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT) (2002)

  2. IAEA, Corrosion and deposit evaluation in large diameter pipes by radiography, Internal Report of the Second RCM of the CRP, International Atomic Energy Agency, Istanbul, Turkey (2004)

  3. Rokrok, B., Edalati, K., Yahaghi, E., Mohammadzadeh, N., Rastkhah, N., Movafeghi, A.: Three-dimensional mapping of non-complex specimens by image processing and optical density evaluation of digitised radiographs. Insight 51(6), 315–320 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva, A.S.S., Oliveira, D.F., Machado, A.D., Nascimento, J.R., Lopes, R.T.: An evaluation of imaging plate characteristics that determine image quality in computed radiography. Mater. Eval. 72, 392–397 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rathod, V.R., Anand, R.S.: A comparative study of different segmentation techniques for detection of flaws in NDE weld images. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 31(1), 1–16 (2012)

  6. Yahaghi, E.: The detection of weld defect images using SFS and wavelet denoising methods. Insight 5(6), 308–311 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L., Dong, W., Zhang, D., Shi, G.: Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping. Elsevier-Pattern Recognit. 43, 1531–1549 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics, vol. 2. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, C.I., Du, Q.: Interference and noise-adjusted principal components analysis. IEEE Trans. Geoscience Remote. Sens. 37(5), 2387–2396 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdullah, H.N., Hasan, M.F., Tawfeeq, Q.S.: Speckle noise reduction in SAR images using double-density dual tree DWT. Medwell J. 7, 281–284 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdullah, H.N., Hasan, M.F., Tawfeeq, Q.S.: SAR image denoising based on dual tree complex wavelet transform. Medwell J 3, 587–590 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amirmazlaghani, M., Amindavar, H.: A novel wavelet domain statistical approach for denoising SAR images, ICIP (2009)

  13. John Peter, K., Senthamarai Kannan, K., Arumugan, S., Nagarajan, G.: Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with self similarity pixel strategy. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 11(5), 296–301 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muresan, D.D., Parks, T.W.: Adaptive principal components and image denoising, In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, 14–17 Sept 2003, pp. I101–I10 (2003)

  15. Pizurica, A., Philips, W.: Estimating the probability of the presence of a signal of interest in multi resolution single- and multiband image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(3), 654–665 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Starck, J.L., Candes, E.J., Donoho, D.L.: The curvelet transform for image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11(6), 670–684 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Elad, M., Aharon, M.: Image de-noising via sparse and redundant representation over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(12), 3736–3745 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, G.Y., Ke’gl, B.: Image de-noising with complex ridgelets. Pattern Recognit. 40(2), 578–585 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kervrann, C., Boulanger, J.: Optimal spatial adaptation for patch based image de-noising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(10), 2866–2878 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Movafeghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Movafeghi, A., Yahaghi, E. & Mohammadzadeh, N. Defect Detection Improvement of Digitised Radiographs by Principal Component Analysis with Local Pixel Grouping. J Nondestruct Eval 34, 17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0290-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0290-z

Keywords

Navigation