Two paradigms measuring teaching effectiveness in higher education—one focusing on instructional behaviors (SET), and the other, on teachers' nonverbal and verbal immediacy (NVI-VI)—have been estranged from each other for decades despite their common focus on teaching effectiveness. To juxtapose the two paradigms, both SET and NVI-VI questionnaires were administered at separate times in courses taught by 183 college instructors. Correlations between the two measures were extremely high (up to r = 0.72), and a PCA yielded a strong and highly reliable first un-rotated component, indicating that the same underlying construct of "teaching effectiveness" was validly measured by both paradigms. Two clear components emerged after rotation, representing clear SET and NVI factors. Following median splits into a 2 × 2 table, consonant status of individual instructors on both SET and NVI-VI (being either "High/High" or "Low/Low") was found for 73% of the 183 instructors, but over a quarter of the sample demonstrated dissonant status, equally distributed between being "High SET/Low NVI-VI" or "Low SET/High NVI-VI." The NVI measurement administered in the 5th week of the semester predicted effectively the SET global evaluation at the end of the course. A theory of "Student Evaluations Fast and Slow" was proposed (following Kahneman's theorizing), where the early "fast" NVI precedes the later "slow" reasoned SET, leading to a rich, integrated picture of teaching effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aleamoni, L. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 153–166.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors ofinterpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.
Andersen, J. (1978). The relationship between teacher immediacy and teaching effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. West Virginia University. Morgantown, W.Va.
Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.). Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). Transaction Books.
Armor, D. (1974). Toward a modified theory of reliability for social measurement. . Rand Corporation.
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 258–290.
Babad, E. (2007). Teachers’ nonverbal behavior and its effects on students. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning: An evidence-based perspective. (pp. 201–261). Springer.
Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Teachers’ brief nonverbal behaviors can predict certain aspects of students’ evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 553–562.
Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2004). Prediction of students’ evaluations from brief instances of professors’ nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 3–33.
Babad, E., Kaplowitz, H., & Darley, J. (1999). A “classic” revisited: Students’ immediate and delayed evaluations of a warm/cold instructor. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 81–102.
Begrich, L., Kugers, S., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2021). At a first glance—How reliable and valid is the thin slices technique to assess instructional quality? Learning and Instruction, 74, 1–17.
Boring, E. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 36, 35–37.
DePaulo, B. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
Feldman, K. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning: An evidence-based perspective. (pp. 93–129). Springer.
Hammer, R., Peer, E., & Babad, E. (2018). Faculty attitudes about student evaluations and their relations to self-image as teacher. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 517–537.
Harris, M., & Rosenthal, R. (2005). No more teachers’ dirty looks: Effects of teacher nonverbal behavior on student outcomes. In R. Riggio & R. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communication. (pp. 157–192). Taylor and Francis.
Hativa, N. (2013). Student ratings of instruction: Recognizing effective teaching. . Oron Publications.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. . Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Keller, M., Hoy, A., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 743–769.
Marsh, H. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 77–95.
Marsh, H. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. (pp. 319–383). Springer.
Marsh, H., Dicke, T., & Pfeiffer, M. (2019). A tale of two quests: The (almost) non-overlapping research literatures on students’ evaluations of secondary-school and university teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 1–18.
Marsh, H., & Dunkin, M. (1997). Student evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. (pp. 241–320). Agathon.
Moore, A., Masterson, J., Christophel, D., & Shea, K. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29–39.
Murray, H. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 138.
Murray, H. (1997). Does evaluation of teaching lead to improvement of teaching? International Journal for Academic Development, 2, 8–23.
Murray, H. (2007). Low-inference teaching behaviours and college teaching effectiveness: Recent developments and controversies. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. (pp. 145–200). Springer.
Naftulin, D., Ware, J., & , Donnelly, F. . (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 630–635.
Peer, E., & Babad, E. (2014). The Doctor Fox research (1973) re-revisited: “Educational seduction” ruled out. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 36–45.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359–376.
Perry, R. (1990). Introduction to the special section. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 183–188.
Perry, R., Abrami, P., & Leventhal, L. (1979). Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness and lecture content on student rating and achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 107–116.
Richmond, V., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10. (pp. 547–590). Sage.
Rosenshine, B. (1970). Enthusiastic teaching: A research review. The School Review, 78, 499–514.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1983). Essentials of behavioral research. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Soltanian, N., & Sadeghi, A. (2021). Thin-slice judgments of English language teachersuccess in instruction: Effects of learners’ gender, age, and language proficiency. Mextesol Journal, 45, 1–12.
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluations of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83, 598–642.
Theall, M., & Feldman, K. (2007). Commentary and update on Feldman’s (1997) Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning: An evidence-based perspective. (pp. 130–143). Springer.
Tyng, C., Amin, H., Saad, M., & Malik, S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–22.
Wilson, J., & Locker, L. (2007–2008). Immediacy scale represents four factors: Nonverbal and verbal components predict student outcomes. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 42, 4–10.
Witt, O., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207.
Wood, A. (1998). Effects of teacher enthusiasm on student motivation. Selective attention and text memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Western Ontario. London, Canada.
The authors wish to extend their gratitude to Eyal Gamliel, Refael Tikochinski and Robert Rosenthal for their valuable help.
This paper is dedicated to the memory of John Darley, a dear friend and collaborator in experimental research combining basic social psychology and students' evaluations of teachers.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Babad, E., Sahar-Inbar, L., Hammer, R. et al. Student Evaluations Fast and Slow: It's Time to Integrate Teachers' Nonverbal Behavior in Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness. J Nonverbal Behav 45, 321–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-021-00364-4
- Students' evaluations of teaching
- Teacher enthusiasm
- Nonverbal immediacy
- Nonverbal behavior
- Fast and slow systems