Abstract
Emerging evidence revealed that honesty and trustworthiness are important drivers of the impression-formation process. Questions remain, however, regarding the role of these moral attributes in guiding real and concrete behaviors. Filling this gap, the present study investigated the influence of honesty on a nonverbal behavior that regulates social interactions: behavioral synchrony. Movements were recorded while participants interacted with a partner who was depicted as honest (versus dishonest) or as friendly (versus unfriendly). Results showed that synchrony was affected only by the honesty of the partner. Specifically, the more the interaction partner lacked honesty, the lower the perceived similarity between the self and the interaction partner, which in turn diminished the promptness to engage in behavioral synchrony. Our findings connected the literature on behavioral synchrony with that on the implication of morality for social perception, revealing the key role of the honesty facet of moral character in shaping nonverbal behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A pretest confirmed that the 16 key movements were not perceived as threatening. Indeed, 15 students (M age = 22.00, SD = 1.89) not involved in the main study were asked to indicate the extent to which each movement appeared as threatening using a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely). Results showed that all the scores were below the midpoint of the scale, revealing thus that the movements were perceived as not threatening. Only one movement (i.e., point two fingers of the right hand) was perceived as mildly threatening. However, the main findings on the qualitative index of synchrony [F(1, 75) = 4.17, p = .04, η 2p = .05] and on the promptness to synchronize [F(1, 75) = 3.86, p = .05, η 2p = .05] did not change when we excluded such a movement from the analysis.
Since in our experiment the confederate was a male, we explored whether participants’ gender played a role in driving our results. We run a series of 2 (dimension: honesty vs. friendliness) × 2 (valence: negative vs. positive) × 2 (gender: male vs. female) ANOVAs on our key variables: global impression, perceived similarity, and the two indexes of synchrony. The analyses revealed neither main effects of gender, Fs(1, 71) < 2.34, ps > .13, nor two-way interaction effects, Fs(1, 71) < 2.46, ps > .12, nor three-way interaction effects, Fs(1, 71) <.96, ps > .33. For similar findings, see Dimberg and Lundqvist, 1990.
To compute a single index of global impression we averaged the measure of impression assessed before and after the interaction task. We obtained analogous results using the single pre-imitation or the post-imitation measure of global impression as a mediator. The total indirect effect using pre-imitation impression was not significant neither on promptness to synchronize, b = -.02, SE = .04, 95% CI [-.11, .06], nor on Time, b = -.03, SE = .08, 95% CI [-.20, .12]. Consistently, the total indirect effect using post-imitation impression was not significant neither on promptness to synchronize, b = -.03, SE = .03, 95% CI [-.11, .005], nor on Time, b = .02, SE = .04, 95% CI [-.02, .16].
References
Abele, A. E., & Bruckmuller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948.
Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7, 275–296.
Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 243–253.
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–432). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408.
Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.
Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811–821.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cappella, J. N. (1997). Behavioral and judged coordination in adult informal social interactions: Vocal and kinesic indicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 119–131.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487.
Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61–149). San Diego: Academic Press.
De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305–328.
De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206–219.
Dimberg, U., & Lundqvist, L. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30, 151–159.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 38–44.
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27, 949–960.
Kimura, M., & Daibo, I. (2006). Interactional synchrony in conversations about emotional episodes: A measurement by “the between-participants pseudosynchrony experimental paradigm”. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 115–126.
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162.
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249.
Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1064.
Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., Richardson, M. J., Smith, C. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2012). Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 746–751.
Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109, 152–156.
Miles, L. K., Griffiths, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Too late to coordinate: Contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 52–60.
Pagliaro, S., Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., D’Angelo, M., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 37–44.
Payne, B. K. (2008). What mistakes disclose: A process dissociation approach to automatic and controlled processes in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1073–1092.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rule, N. O., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces. Cognition, 125, 207–218.
Semin, G. R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 630–649). New York: Guilford Publications.
Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, entrainment and coordination. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 119–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.
Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455–460.
Vacharkulksemsuk, T., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 399–402.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11, 262.
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695.
van Lange, P. A., & Sedikides, C. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675–680.
van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432, 88–93.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impression: Making up your mind after a 100-Ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.
Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188.
Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.
Yabar, Y., Johnston, L., Miles, L., & Peace, V. (2006). Implicit behavioral mimicry: Investigating the impact of group membership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 97–113.
Ybarra, O., Chan, E., & Park, D. (2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 85–100.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Stefano D’Urso and Dario Peronace for their help in collecting the data. We also thank Ellen Anthony, Olimpia Bernardini, Sonia Yamile Cané, Matteo Mazzà, Letizia Taccaliti, Marta Tritto, and Sara Pireddu for the coding procedures. This work was supported by a Grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research (FIRB: RBFR128CR6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Marco Brambilla and Simona Sacchi contributed equally to this work and the order of names in the byline is alphabetical.
Appendix: Honesty and Friendliness Manipulation
Appendix: Honesty and Friendliness Manipulation
- Honesty:
-
Last evening I went to the cinema and near my seat I found a wallet with 300 Euros. I went to the reception desk and I helped to find the owner of the wallet.
- Dishonesty:
-
Last evening I went to the cinema and near my seat I found a wallet with 300 Euros. I took the money and then I left the cinema.
- Friendliness:
-
Last evening I went out for dinner with a friend and with some other people my friend knew that I hadn’t met before. Despite this, I was friendly with everybody and talked to my friend’s guests.
- Unfriendliness:
-
Last evening I went out for dinner with a friend and with some other people my friend knew that I hadn’t met before. During the evening I was unkind with everybody and I did not talk to my friend’s guests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Menegatti, M. et al. Honesty and Dishonesty Don’t Move Together: Trait Content Information Influences Behavioral Synchrony. J Nonverbal Behav 40, 171–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0229-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0229-9