Skip to main content
Log in

Generic Reference is Less Marked Than Specific Reference in Children’s Gestures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generic noun phrases, or generics, refer to kinds (e.g., Birds lay eggs) rather than specific individuals (e.g., This bird lays eggs). Prior research with adults has indicated that adults are less likely to gesture in association with generic versus specific reference. In the current studies, we examined this phenomenon in children, comparing children’s gestures in scenarios of generic versus specific reference. Across two pragmatic contexts, three- to six-year-old children’s pointing was reduced during generic reference compared to specific reference. Results thus suggest that the tendency to reduce gestural marking for generics emerges early in development. We discuss these results within the context of a claim known as the “generics-as-default” proposal, which holds that reduced marking reflects that generics are basic and cognitively default.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2008). Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning. Cognition, 107, 19–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2009). Information learned from generic language becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations. Cognition, 113, 14–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2011). The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. Child Development, 82, 471–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, A., & Scott, R. M. (2012). Children expect generic knowledge to be widely shared. Cognition, 123, 419–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, S., Morissette, P., & Ricard, M. (1995). Two perspectives on pointing in infancy. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 85–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2004). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 445–484). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., & Raman, L. (2003). Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. Child Development, 74, 308–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., Manczak, E. M., & Graham, S. A. (2013). Children’s sensitivity to the knowledge expressed in pedagogical and non-pedagogical contexts. Developmental Psychology, 49, 491–504.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, M., De Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2010). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. In M. Gullberg & K. De Bot (Eds.), Gestures in language development (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Raman, L. (2009). Generic language and judgments about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central? Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 481–505.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication of Italian vs American children. First Language, 28, 164–181.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Pointing out new news, old news, and absent referents at 12 months of age. Developmental Science, 10, F1–F7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liszkowski, U., Schäfer, M., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Prelinguistic infants, but not chimpanzees, communicate about absent entities. Psychological Science, 20, 654–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, B., Gelman, S. A., Escalante, C., Huayhua, M., & Puma, R. (2011). A developmental analysis of generic nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua. Language Learning and Development, 7, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, N., Alibali, M., & Evans, J. L. (2000). The role of gesture in children’s language comprehension: Now they need it, now they don’t. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., & Baldwin, D. A. (2013). Pointing as a socio-pragmatic cue to particular vs. generic reference. Language Learning and Development, 9, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. (2015). Frequency and informativeness of parents’ gestural cues associated with generic vs. particular reference. Language Learning and Development, 11, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. J. (2010). Generics: A philosophical introduction. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettenati, P., Sekine, K., Congestrì, & Volterra, V. (2012). A comparative study on representational gesture in Italian and Japanese children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. L., Silverman, R., & Mullan, B. (2013). The role of pictures and gestures as nonverbal aids in preschoolers’ word learning in a novel language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, M. M., & Baldwin, D. A. (2004). Discussing those not present: Comprehension of references to absent caregivers. Journal of Child Language, 31, 537–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanoni, E., & Salmon, K. (2005). Giving memory a hand: Instructing children to gesture enhances their event recall. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M. W., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith Meyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, M., Gelman, S.A. Generic Reference is Less Marked Than Specific Reference in Children’s Gestures. J Nonverbal Behav 40, 65–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0220-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0220-x

Keywords

Navigation