Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 355–370 | Cite as

Dominant Voices and Attractive Faces: The Contribution of Visual and Auditory Information to Integrated Person Impressions

  • Constantin RezlescuEmail author
  • Tegan Penton
  • Vincent Walsh
  • Hikaru Tsujimura
  • Sophie K. Scott
  • Michael J. Banissy
Original Paper


Faces and voices, in isolation, prompt consistent social evaluations. However, most human interactions involve both seeing and talking with another person. Our main goal was to investigate how facial and vocal information are combined to reach an integrated person impression. In Study 1, we asked participants to rate faces and voices separately for perceived trustworthiness, attractiveness, and dominance. Most previous studies relied on stimuli in which extra-vocal information (e.g., verbal content, prosody) may have confounded voice-based effects; to prevent these unwanted influences, we used brief, neutral vowel sounds. Voices, like faces, led to the formation of highly reliable impressions. Voice trustworthiness correlated with voice attractiveness, mirroring the relation between face trustworthiness and attractiveness, but did not correlate with voice dominance. Inconsistent with the possibility that face and voice evaluations are indicative of real character traits, we found no positive correlations between judgments of trustworthiness or dominance based on faces and the same judgments based on voices (there was also no correlation between face attractiveness and voice attractiveness). In Study 2, we asked participants to evaluate male targets after seeing their faces and hearing their voices. Faces and voices contributed equally to judgments of trustworthiness and combined to produce a significant interaction effect. For attractiveness, faces were given more weight than voices, possibly due to the predominantly visual character of the attractiveness concept (there was no interaction effect). For dominance, the reverse pattern was true, with voices having a larger effect than faces on final judgments. In this case the auditory cues may be perceived to be more reliable because of the strong links between voice pitch, masculinity, and dominance.


Person perception Trait judgments Voice evaluations Trustworthiness Dominance 



C.R. was supported by a Ph.D. fellowship from Axa Research Fund. M.J.B. was supported by the British Academy (PF100123) and ESRC (ES/K00882X/1).


  1. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Cantril, H. (1934). Judging personality from voice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 207–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Banissy, M. J., Sauter, D. A., Ward, J., Warren, J. E., Walsh, V., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Suppressing sensorimotor activity modulates the discrimination of auditory emotions but not speaker identity. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(41), 13552–13557.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6(2), 269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research:’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, D. S. (1990). Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14(3), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, D. S. (1991). Accuracy in social perception: Contributions of facial and vocal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 298–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry, D. S. (1992). Vocal types and stereotypes: Joint effects of vocal attractiveness and vocal maturity on person perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(1), 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Busso, C., Deng, Z., Yildirim, S., Bulut, M., Lee, C. M., Kazemzadeh, A., et al. (2004). Analysis of emotion recognition using facial expressions, speech and multimodal information. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on multimodal interfaces (pp. 205–211). ACM.Google Scholar
  14. Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2651–2656.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Roy, S., Saint-Amour, D., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2008). Audio-visual integration of emotion expression. Brain Research, 1242, 126–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 773–780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Mallinger, A. (1999). High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrenkranz, J., Bliss, E., & Sheard, M. H. (1974). Plasma testosterone: Correlation with aggressive behavior and social dominance in man. Psychosomatic Medicine, 36(6), 469–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O’Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitch, T. W., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1511–1522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraccaro, P. J., O’Connor, J. J., Re, D. E., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Faking it: Deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 85(1), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., & Wilmer, J. B. (2012). Is the web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 847–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, V. S. (2006). Mate choice decisions: The role of facial beauty. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 9–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, A., Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2012). Signals of personality and health: The contributions of facial shape, skin texture, and viewing angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1353–1361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kramer, E. (1963). Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 60(4), 408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Latinus, M., & Belin, P. (2012). Perceptual auditory aftereffects on voice identity using brief vowel stimuli. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e41384.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. British Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 111–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 353–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McAleer, P., Todorov, A., & Belin, P. (2014). How do you say ‘hello’? Personality impressions from brief novel voices. PLoS One, 9(3), e90779.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, M., Baumann, S., Wildgruber, D., & Alter, K. (2007). How the brain laughs. Comparative evidence from behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies in human and monkey. Behavioural Brain Research, 182(2), 245–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connor, O., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 64–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087–11092.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pear, T. H. (1931). Voice and personality. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Puts, D., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rezlescu, C., Duchaine, B., Olivola, C. Y., & Chater, N. (2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS One, 7(3), e34293.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Riggio, R. E., Widaman, K. F., Tucker, J. S., & Salinas, C. (1991). Beauty is more than skin deep: Components of attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(6), 2408–2412.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Scherer, K. R. (1972). Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality, 40(2), 191–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Scott, S. K. (2008). Voice processing in monkey and human brains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 323–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stirrat, M. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21(3), 349–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Surawski, M. K., & Ossoff, E. P. (2006). The effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on impression formation of politicians. Current Psychology, 25(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Penke, L., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Judging a man by the width of his face: The role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events. Psychological Science, 25(3), 806–811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vecchiato, G., Toppi, J., Maglione, A. G., Olejarczyk, E., Astolfi, L., Mattia, D., et al. (2014). Neuroelectrical correlates of trustworthiness and dominance judgments related to the observation of political candidates. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2014, 434296. doi: 10.1155/2014/434296.
  51. Verdonck, A., Gaethofs, M., Carels, C., & de Zegher, F. (1999). Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty. European Journal of Orthodontics, 21(2), 137–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vukovic, J., Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Smith, F. G., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2011). Variation in perceptions of physical dominance and trustworthiness predicts individual differences in the effect of relationship context on women’s preferences for masculine pitch in men’s voices. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 37–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiggins, J. S., Phillips, N., & Trapnell, P. (1989). Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zebrowitz, L. A., & McDonald, S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6), 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(2), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuckerman, M., & Hodgins, H. S. (1993). Developmental changes in the effects of the physical and vocal attractiveness stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotype: Replication and elaboration. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14(2), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Hodgins, H. S. (1991). Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 545–554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuckerman, M., & Sinicropi, V. (2011). When physical and vocal attractiveness differ: Effects on favorability of interpersonal impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantin Rezlescu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tegan Penton
    • 3
  • Vincent Walsh
    • 4
  • Hikaru Tsujimura
    • 3
  • Sophie K. Scott
    • 4
  • Michael J. Banissy
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyGoldsmiths UniversityLondonUK
  4. 4.Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations