Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 17–33 | Cite as

The Voluntary Facial Action Technique: A Method to Test the Facial Feedback Hypothesis

  • Ulf DimbergEmail author
  • Sven Söderkvist
Original Paper


According to the facial feedback hypothesis, facial muscles do not only express emotions, they also have the ability to modulate subjective experiences of emotions and to initiate emotions. This study examined the voluntary facial action technique, where participants were instructed to react with the Zygomatic major muscle (smile) or the Corrugator supercilii muscle (frown) when exposed to different stimuli. The results demonstrate that the technique effectively induces facial feedback effects. Through use of this technique we further addressed three important areas of facial feedback and found, first, that facial feedback did not modulate the experience of positive and negative emotion evoking stimuli differently. Second, the modulating ability provided significant feedback effects, while the initiating ability did not. Third, an effect of feedback remained and could be detected even some time after the critical manipulation. It is concluded that the present technique can be used in the future study of facial feedback.


Facial feedback Facial expressions Emotion 



This study was supported by grants to Ulf Dimberg from The Swedish Research Council and The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. We thank Monika Thunberg for helpful comments on the manuscript.


  1. Adelmann, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andréasson, P., & Dimberg, U. (2008). Emotional empathy and facial feedback. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buck, R. (1980). Nonverbal behaviour and the theory of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 811–824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19, 643–647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimberg, U. (1986). Facial reactions to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli. Biological Psychology, 23, 153–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimberg, U. (1990). Facial reactions to fear-relevant stimuli for subjects high and low in specific fear. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 65–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimberg, U. (1997). Facial reactions: Rapidly evoked emotional responses. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 115–123.Google Scholar
  9. Dimberg, U. (2010). The voluntary facial action technique yields comparable frowns and smiles (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  10. Dimberg, U., Hansson, G., & Thunberg, M. (1998). Fear of snakes and facial reactions: A case of rapid emotional responding. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimberg, U., & Karlsson, B. (1997). Facial reactions to different emotionally relevant stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Flack, W. F., Laird, J. D., & Cavallaro, L. A. (1999). Separate and combined effects of facial expressions and bodily postures on emotional feelings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, M. G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2005). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.), What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (2nd ed., pp. 217–238). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gellhorn, E. (1964). Motion and emotion: The role of proprioception in the physiology and pathology of the emotions. Psychological Review, 71, 457–472.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hennenlotter, A., Dresel, C., Castrop, F., Ceballos Baumann, A. O., Wohlschläger, A. M., & Haslinger, B. (2009). The link between facial feedback and neural activity within central circuitries of emotion—New insights from Botulinum toxin–induced denervation of frown muscles. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 537–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ito, T. A., Chiao, K. W., Devine, P. G., Lorig, T. S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). The influence of facial feedback on race bias. Psychological Science, 17(3), 256–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. James, W. (1884). What is emotion? Mind, 19, 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundquist, L.-O., & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 203–211.Google Scholar
  26. McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypothesis: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2, 52–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Strack, F., Martin, F. F., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 1. In: The positive affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Tomkins, S. S. (1980). Affect as amplification: Some modifications in theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience (pp. 141–164). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations