Skip to main content

Vocal and Physiological Changes in Response to the Physical Attractiveness of Conversational Partners

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior volume 34, pages 155–167 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

We examined how individuals may change their voices when speaking to attractive versus unattractive individuals, and if it were possible for others to perceive these vocal changes. In addition, we examined if any concurrent physiological effects occurred when speaking with individuals who varied in physical attractiveness. We found that both sexes used a lower-pitched voice and showed a higher level of physiological arousal when speaking to the more attractive, opposite-sex target. Furthermore, independent raters evaluated the voice samples directed toward the attractive target (versus the unattractive target) as sounding more pleasant when the two voice samples from the same person presented had a reasonably perceptually noticeable difference in pitch. These findings may have implications for the role voice plays in mate selection and attraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Amir, O., Biron-Shental, T., & Shabtai, E. (2006). Birth control pills and nonprofessional voice: Acoustic analyses. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(5), 1114–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anolli, L., & Ciceri, R. (2002). Analysis of the vocal profiles of male seduction: From exhibition to self-disclosure. Journal of General Psychology, 129, 149–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters, 3, 682–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 327–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. NeuroReport, 11, 3829–3834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. (1990). Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60, 773–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65, 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. J., & McCabe, R. B. (1992). Gender differences in the perception of vocal sexiness. In J. M. G. van der Dennen (Ed.), The nature of the sexes: The sociobiology of sex differences and the ‘‘battle of the sexes’’ (p. 55). The Netherlands: Origin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davitz, J. R. (1964). The communication of emotional meaning. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1976). Body movements and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethofer, T., Wiethoff, S., Anders, S., Kreifelts, B., Grod, W., & Wildgruber, D. (2007). The voices of seduction: Cross-gender effects in the processing of erotic prosody. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 334–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., Neave, N., & Wakelin, D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology, 72, 160–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37, 615–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulation of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behavior, 69, 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Braunwald, K. G. (1981). Gender cues in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2002). The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istvan, J., Griffitt, W., & Weidner, G. (1982). Sexual arousal and the polarization of perceived sexual attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Vukovic, J. (2008). Integrating cues of social interest and pitch in men’s preferences for women’s voices. Biology Letters, 4, 192–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpf, A. (2006). The human voice. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C. E., & Seidel, S. D. (1991). Vocal signs of confidence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. R. (1963). Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 408–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. R. (1964). Elimination of cues in judgments of emotion from voice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P. (1996). Elements of acoustic phonetics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaderbrand, K., Dekam, J., Morey, A., & Tuma, L (2008). The effects of voice pitch on perceptions of attractiveness: Do you sound hot or not. Winona State University Psychology Student Journal.

  • Montepare, J. M., & Vega, C. (1988). Women’s vocal reactions to intimate and casual male friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi, T., & Kikuchi, H. (1997). Voice and interpersonal attraction. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksenberg, L., Coleman, L., & Cannell, C. F. (1986). Interviewers’ voice and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, C., McCormack, P., & Russell, A. (1998). Have women’s voices lowered across time? A cross-sectional study of Australian women’s voices. Journal of Voice, 12, 208–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pipitone, R. N., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2008). Women’s attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Gaulin, J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, D., Lonsdale, D., & Brown, B. (2006). The effects of average fundamental frequency and variance of fundamental frequency on male vocal attractiveness to women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousey, C. L., & Moriarty, A. E. (1965). Diagnostic implications of speech sounds: The reflections of developmental conflict and trauma. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of Social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, N. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Sex differences in nonverbal and verbal communication with bosses, peers, and subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. M., Botto, R. W., & Herrick, C. D. (1972). Behavioral and physiological effects of false heart rate feedback: A replication and extension. Psychophysiology, 9, 21–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V. J., Olson, C. T., & Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. F., Liberzon, I., & Koeppe, R. A. (2000). The effect of graded aversive stimuli on limbic and visual activation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1415–1425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, S. K., & Fisher, J. E. (1979). Characteristics of a simulated sexy voice. Folia Phoniatrica, 31, 242–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uchiyama, I., Hanari, T., Ito, T., & Takahashi, K. (1990). Patterns of psychological and physiological responses for common affects elicited by films. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 33, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valins, S. (1967). Emotionality and information concerning internal reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 458–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38, 253–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Little, A. C., et al. (2008). Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine male voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winton, W. N., Putnam, L. E., & Krauss, R. M. (1984). Facial and autonomic manifestations of the dimensional structure of emotion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woll, S. B., & McFall, M. E. (1979). The effects of false feedback on attributed arousal and rated attractiveness in female subjects. Journal of Personality, 47, 214–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank David Osgood and The Summer Albright College Research Experience Program (ACRE) for their support of this research, Rodney Warfield for his assistance in obtaining participants for this study, and Andrea Chapdelaine for helpful comments with analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Albright College, Reading, PA, 19612, USA

    Susan M. Hughes & Bradley C. Rhodes

  2. University of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Sally D. Farley

Authors
  1. Susan M. Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sally D. Farley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bradley C. Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, S.M., Farley, S.D. & Rhodes, B.C. Vocal and Physiological Changes in Response to the Physical Attractiveness of Conversational Partners. J Nonverbal Behav 34, 155–167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0087-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0087-9

Keywords

  • Vocal changes
  • Attractiveness
  • Voice
  • Physiological responses
  • Romantic attraction