Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Tackling Diving: The Perception of Deceptive Intentions in Association Football (Soccer)

  • Paul H. MorrisEmail author
  • David Lewis
Original Paper


The three studies reported examine judgment about the attempts of footballers (soccer players) to deceptively exaggerate the effect of a tackle. Study one reveals that non-professional participants agree about which players were attempting deception and those that were not; there was also agreement about the tackles in which the intentions were ambiguous. Study two demonstrates that the intentions of tackled players match the judgment of their intentions by observers. Study three provides a taxonomy of behaviors that are associated with deceptive and non deceptive intentions. We conclude that deceptive intentions in this context are to a degree manifest in behavior and are observable.


Deceptive intentions Perception intentions Deception Sport perception 


  1. Abernethy, B. (1990). Expertise, visual search, and information pick-up in squash. Perception, 19, 63–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernethy, B., Gill, D. P., Parks, S. L., & Packer, S. T. (2001). Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception, 30, 233–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmer, N. J., Nevill, A. M., & Lane, A. M. (2005). Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing? Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 409–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, M. (2004). 101 youth soccer drills. London: A & C Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Dasser, V., Ulbaek, I., & Premack, D. (1989). The perception of intention. Science, 243, 365–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson, P., Dobson, S., Goddard, J., & Wilson, J. (2007). Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English premier league. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennet, D. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dohmen, T. (2008). Social pressure influences decisions of individuals: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrow, D., & Abernethy, B. (2003). Do expertise and the degree of perception––action coupling affect natural anticipatory performance? Perception, 32, 1127–1139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1988). The dark side of self and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sport. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 74–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenlees, I. A., Bradley, A., Holder, T. P., & Thelwell, R. C. (2005). The impact of two forms of opponents’ non-verbal communication on impression formation and outcome expectations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenlees, I., Leyland, A., Thelwell, R., & Filby, W. (2008). Soccer penalty takers’ uniform and pre-penalty kick gaze affect the impressions formed of them by opposing goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 569–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Leissing, J. (2008). When the referee sees red…. Psychological Science, 19, 769–771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, M. V., Paul, G. G., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of a team’s aggressive reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 991–1000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsumoto, D., Konno, J., Hata, S., & Takeuchi, M. (2007). Uniform color and sport competition outcomes. Research Journal of Budo, 39, 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Michotte, A. (1946/1963). The perception of causality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  23. Műller, S., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2006). How do world-class cricket batsmen anticipate a bowler’s intention? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2162–2186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.Google Scholar
  25. Plessner, H., & Haar, T. (2006). Sports performance judgments from a social cognitive perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The Language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schlottman, A., & Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation at a distance? Perception, 28, 1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider, D. J. (2005). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tye, C. M., Amato, S. L., Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., & Peters, D. (1999). The willingness of children to lie and the assessment of credibility in an ecologically relevant laboratory setting. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.Google Scholar
  32. Wilkerson, W. S. (1999). From bodily motions to bodily intentions: The perception of bodily activity. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young, M. E., Beckmann, J. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (2006). Pigeons’ discrimination of Michotte’s launching effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 223–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations