Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Differences for Specific Body Regions When Looking at Men and Women

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to provide first evidence for gender differences in gaze patterns while looking at the body of men and women. For this purpose participants were exposed to 30 pictures of 15 male and 15 female models in casual clothing. The individual scan paths were recorded using an eye-tracker. The results show that both male and female observers primarily gaze at people’s face. Only after this initial face-scan, men look significantly earlier and longer at women’s breasts, while women look earlier at men’s legs. These observations uncover important aspects of the pattern of the human gaze at others and particularly reveal important gender differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32(3), 537–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 819–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Munich: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Facial expressions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 301–320). Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed. Undertanding faces and feelings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1979). Facial expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 527–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, R. H. (1978). Temporal organization of conversation. Sociolinguistics Newsletter, 9(2(Summer)), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H., Sandblom, J., Herlitz, A., Fransson, P., Wright, C. I., & Backman, L. (2004). Sex-differential brain activation during exposure to female and male faces. Neuroreport, 15(2), 235–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage. Biological Psychology, 32(1), 3–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, M., & Holmqvist, K. (1999). Keeping an eye on gestures: Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7(1), 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293(5539), 2425–2430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 59–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C., Castelhano, M. S., & Falk, R. J. (2003). Eye movements and picture processing during recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(5), 725–734.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 80–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(1545), 1213–1217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16(11), 890–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40(1–2), 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(9), 809–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16(1), 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner, W. H., Krieschel, S., Hecht, H., Trippe, R., & Weiss, T. (2004). Eye movements and behavioral responses to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli during visual search in phobic and nonphobic subjects. Emotion, 4(4), 323–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives and information-processing mechanisms. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 511–536). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharlemann, J. P. W., Eckel, C. C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R. K. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 617–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3), 398–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinberger, S. R., Huddy, V., & Burton, A. M. (2004). N250r: A face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport, 15(9), 1501–1505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1995). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1089–1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Grammer, K. (1999). The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. M., Senior, C., David, A. S., Loughland, C. M., & Gordon, E. (2001). In search of the ‘Duchenne’ smile: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 122–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowitz, L. A., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Yadira Roa Romero, Luisa Kreußel, Andrea Büttner, Anja Schöning, Anita Pälchen, Christin Krenz, and Marie-Susann Raschke for assistance during data acquisition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Hewig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewig, J., Trippe, R.H., Hecht, H. et al. Gender Differences for Specific Body Regions When Looking at Men and Women. J Nonverbal Behav 32, 67–78 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-007-0043-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-007-0043-5

Keywords

Navigation