Abstract
Previous research (Hughes et al. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:173–180, 2002) has shown that ratings of voice attractiveness are negatively correlated to fluctuating asymmetry (FA, a measure of developmental stability and fitness) but are unrelated to the second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D, a measure of prenatal sex hormone exposure). In the present study, we considered ratings of these voices based on a number of other descriptive traits that may be particularly important in mate selection. Men with voices rated as approachable, intelligent, sexy, and warm showed greater bilateral body symmetry. Women with voices rated as approachable, sexy, and most likely to get dates also tended to be more symmetrical. Furthermore, voices rated as dominant and mature were negatively correlated to 2D:4D ratios in women, suggesting an effect of exposure to higher levels of prenatal androgen. Unlike subjective ratings, objective measures of voice obtained through spectrogram analyses did not account for much variance in either symmetry or digit ratios. These findings implicate the perceptual qualities of voice as a salient marker of underlying genetic quality and viability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addington, D. (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception. Speech Monographs, 35, 492–503.
Allport, G. W., & Cantril, H. (1934). Judging personality from voice. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 37–55.
Austin, E. J., Manning, J. T., McInro, K., & Matthews, E. (2002). A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1115–1124.
Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995). Personality and mate selection in personal ads: Evolutionary preferences in public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 517–536.
Baken, R. J., & Orlikoff, R. F. (2000). Clinical measurement of speech and voice. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Berry, D. (1990). Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141–153.
Bonetti, L., Bonetti, A., & Bolfan, S. N. (2002). Harmonics to noise ratio in vocal professional voices. Acoustical Society of America Journal, 111, 2480–2481.
Brown, B., Strong, W., & Rencher, A. (1973). Perceptions of personality from speech: Effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 29–35.
Brown, B., Strong, W., & Rencher, A. (1974). Fifty-four voices from two: The effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 313–318.
Bruce, E. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In L. Cosmides, et al. (Eds.), The adaptive minds: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267–288). London: Oxford Press.
Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60, 773–780.
Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65, 997–1004.
Daniel, H. J., & McCabe, R. B. (1992). Gender differences in the perception of vocal sexiness. In J. M. G. van der Dennen (Ed.), The nature of the sexes: The sociobiology of sex differences and the “battle if the sexes” (pp. 55–62). Netherlands: Origin Press.
Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Moore, F. R., Smith, M. J., Cornwell, R. E., Tiddeman, B. P., Boothroyd, L. G., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). The voice and face of women: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 398–408.
Fink, B., Manning, J. T., & Neave, N. (2004). Second to forth digit ratio and the “big five” personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 495–503.
Furlow, B. F., Armijo-Prewitt, T., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 823–829.
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 265, 927–933.
Garn, S., Burdi, A., Babler, W., & Stinson, S. (1975). Early prenatal attainment of adult metacarpal-phalangeal rankings and proportions. American Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 43, 327–332.
Hoyt, L., & Hudson, J. (1981). Personal characteristics important in mate preference among college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 93–96.
Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.
Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (in press). Why are we attracted to certain voices? Voice as an evolved medium for the transmission of psychological and biological information. In K. Izdebski (Ed.), Voice and emotion. California: Plural Publishing, Inc.
Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2002). The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 173–180.
Malas, M. A., Dogan, S., Hilal Evcil, E., & Desdicioglu, K. (2006). Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Human Development, 82, 469–475.
Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., Thornhill, R., Rohde, P., Bereczkei, T., Henzi, P., Soler, M., & Szwed, A. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183.
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D. Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004.
Mazur, A., & Booth, S. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397.
Miyake, K., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Beyond personality impressions: Effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on false consensus, social comparison, affiliation, and assumed and perceived similarity. Journal of Personality, 6, 411–437.
Moore, K. L. (1977). The developing human: Clinically orientated embryology. Philadelphia, PA: W.N. Saunders Company.
Mortlock, D., & Innis, J. (1997). Mutation of the hoxa13 in hand-foot-genital syndrome. Natural Genetics, 15, 179–180.
Munoz, J., Mendoza, E., Fresneda, M. D., Carballo, G., & Ramirez, I. (2002). Perceptual analysis in different voice samples: Agreement and reliability. Perceptual Motor Skills, 94, 1187–1195.
Oguchi, T., & Kikuchi, H. (1997). Voice and interpersonal attraction. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 56–61.
Oksenberg, L., Coleman, L., & Cannell, C. F. (1986). Interviewers’ voice and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 97–111.
Phelps, V. (1952). Relative index finger length as a sex-influenced trait in man. American Journal of Human Genetics, 4, 72–79.
Puts, D. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.
Scherer, K. R. (1972). Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality, 40, 191–210.
Scherer, K. R. (1974). Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers. Journal of Pscyholinguistic Research, 3, 281–298.
Symons, D. (1989). The psychology of human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 34–45.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.
Thornhill, R., & Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews, 72, 497–548.
Yogo, Y., Ando, M., Hashi, A., Tsutsui, S., & Yamada, N. (2000). Judgments of emotion by nurses and students given double-bind information on a patient’s tone of voice and message content. Perception Motor Skills, 9, 855–863.
Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67–82.
Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotype: Replication and elaboration. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 97–112.
Zuckerman, M., & Miyake, K. (1993). The attractive voice: What makes it so? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 119–135.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank R. Nathan Pipitone and Franco Dispenza for help with data collection, and Gina Carfagno, Shevon Nicholson, and Marissa Harrison for helpful comments on the analysis of a previous draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, S.M., Pastizzo, M.J. & Gallup, G.G. The Sound of Symmetry Revisited: Subjective and Objective Analyses of Voice. J Nonverbal Behav 32, 93–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-007-0042-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-007-0042-6