Skip to main content
Log in

Anesthesia Information Management Systems in the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Early Adopters

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although theoretical studies on Anesthesia Information Management Systems (AIMS) have proved their benefits, much less attention has been paid to researching the actual adoption of AIMS. Only a few studies from the USA and Western Europe have been published up to now. The purpose of this article is to assess the adoption, motivation for, and barriers to, usage of AIMS from the perspective of early Czech adopters of these systems. A questionnaire was used to gather adopters’ views on motivating factors, benefits encountered after introduction and obstacles perceived to adopting AIMS. Data about usage, costs and functionalities of each of the AIMS was obtained using semi-structured telephone interviews prior to sending out the questionnaire. Five AIMS from three different vendors in four academic hospitals (20% of Czech hospitals of this type) were identified. Improved clinical documentation and convenience for anesthesiologists was reported from every site. Lack of funds, however, was identified as the primary barrier to further adoption. The cost of introduction of AIMS per operating room varied between 1000 and 40,000 US dollars. Although the number of AIMS in the Czech Republic is limited, findings suggest that benefits have been experienced on every site. Findings corroborate previous studies from the USA and Western Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AARKS:

Automated Anesthesia Record Keeping System

HIS:

Hospital Information System

AIMS:

Anesthesia Information Management System

OR:

Operating room

References

  1. Sundararaman, L. V., and Desai, S. P., The Anesthesia Records of Harvey Cushing and Ernest Codman. Anesth. Analg. 126:322–329, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daub, D., Destunis, S., Halbach, M., vom Hövel, R., and Kalff, G., First experiences with a documentation system via display terminals. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg. 23(Suppl):200–204, 1975.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edsall, D. W., Deshane, P., Giles, C., Dick, D., Sloan, B., and Farrow, J., Computerized patient anesthesia records: Less time and better quality than manually produced anesthesia records. J. Clin. Anesth. 5:275–283, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reich, D. L., Wood, R. K., Mattar, R., Krol, M., Adams, D. C., Hossain, S. et al., Arterial Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Discrepancies Between Handwritten and Computerized Anesthesia Records. Anesth. Analg. 91:612–616, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200009000-00022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lerou, J. G., Dirksen, R., van Daele, M., Nijhuis, G. M., and Crul, J. F., Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: A quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia records. J. Clin. Monit. 4(1):37–47, 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allard, J., Dzwonczyk, R., Yablok, D., Block, F. E., and Mcdonald, J. S., Effect of automatic record keeping on vigilance and record keeping time. Br. J. Anaesth. 74(5):619–626, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/74.5.619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman, J. M., Do anesthesia information systems increase malpractice exposure? Results of a Survey. Anesth. Analg. 99(3):840–843, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000130259.52838.3B.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpao, A. F., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Special Case: Perioperative Information Management Systems. In: Ehrenfeld JM, Cannesson M, editors. Monit. Technol. Acute Care Environ., New York: Springer New York, 2014, p. 391–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-546.

  9. Wax, D. B., Beilin, Y., Levin, M., Chadha, N., Krol, M., and Reich, D. L., The effect of an interactive visual reminder in an anesthesia information management system on timeliness of prophylactic antibiotic administration. Anesth. Analg. 104:1462–1466, table of contents, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000263043.56372.5f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpao, A. F., Tan, J. M., Lingappan, A. M., Gálvez, J. A., Morgan, S. E., and Krall, M. A., A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 31(5):885–894, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9921-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stonemetz, J., Anesthesia information management systems marketplace and current vendors. Anesthesiol. Clin. 29:367–375, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2011.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Egger Halbeis, C. B., Epstein, R. H., Macario, A., Pearl, R. G., and Grunwald, Z., Adoption of Anesthesia Information Management Systems by Academic Departments in the United States. Anesth. Analg. 107(4):1323–1329, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31818322d2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stol, I. S., Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Epstein, R. H., Technology Diffusion of Anesthesia Information Management Systems into Academic Anesthesia Departments in the United States. Anesth. Analg. 118(3):644–650, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Balust, J., Egger Halbeis, C. B., and Macario, A., Prevalence of anaesthesia information management systems in university-affiliated hospitals in Europe. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 27:202–208, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283313fc2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sinclair, D. R., Methodologies of anesthesia information management system development. J. Clin. Anesth. 25:425–427, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nair, B. G., Gabel, E., Hofer, I., Schwid, H. A., and Cannesson, M., Intraoperative clinical decision support for anesthesia: A narrative review of available systems. Anesth. Analg. 124(2):603–617, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vigoda, M. M., and Feinstein, D. M., Anesthesia information management systems. Adv. Anesth. 26:121–136, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aan.2008.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kooij, F. O., Klok, T., Hollmann, M. W., and Kal, J. E., Decision Support Increases Guideline Adherence for Prescribing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis. Anesth. Analg. 106(3):893–898, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31816194fb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nair, B. G., Newman, S.-F., Peterson, G. N., Wu, W.-Y., and Schwid, H. A., Feedback Mechanisms Including Real-Time Electronic Alerts to Achieve Near 100% Timely Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Surgical Cases. Anesth. Analg. 111:1293–1300, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f46d89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lubarsky, D. A., Sanderson, I. C., Gilbert, W. C., King, K. P., Ginsberg, B., Dear, G. L., Coleman, R. L., Pafford, T. D., and Reves, J. G., Using an anesthesia information management system as a cost containment tool. Description and validation. Anesthesiology 86(5):1161–1169, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Egger Halbeis, C. B., and Epstein, R. H., The value proposition of anesthesia information management systems. Anesthesiol. Clin. 26(4):665–679, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2008.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah, N. J., Tremper, K. K., and Kheterpal, S., Anatomy of an anesthesia information management system. Anesthesiol. Clin. 29(3):355–365, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2011.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pysyk, C. L., Jee, R., and Zunder, I., Change in staff anesthesiologists’ opinions of an anesthesia information management system (AIMS). J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 33(3):541–542, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0178-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gálvez, J. A., Rothman, B. S., Doyle, C. A., Morgan, S., Simpao, A. F., and Rehman, M. A., A Narrative Review of Meaningful Use and Anesthesia Information Management Systems. Anesth. Analg. 121(3):693–706, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the help of Pavel Waldauf, M.D., Pavel Kellovský M.D., Robert Wagner, M.D., Michal Nejedlý, M.D., and Jiří Mokrejs, M.D., in providing information about each of the AIMS and that of Skans Victoria Airey for her invaluable language help during preparation of this article.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Bruthans.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruthans, J. Anesthesia Information Management Systems in the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Early Adopters. J Med Syst 44, 70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1545-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1545-5

Keywords

Navigation