Advertisement

Accuracy and Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Assessment of the Breasts of Women Affected by Cancer

  • Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro
  • Maíta Marade Oliveira Lima Leite Vaz
  • Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves
  • Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho
  • Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara
  • Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
Image & Signal Processing
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Image & Signal Processing

Abstract

Evaluate reliability and accuracy of infrared thermography in the assessment of women wth breasts cancer. Thirty-five participants had unilateral breast cancer and 17 control subjects were assessed using infrared thermography. To evaluate reliability, two professionals, who were experienced, measured the temperature of the infrared images in two different moments, with a one-week interval. Biopsy was used as a gold standard exam with regard identify breast cancer. The analysis illustrated excellent reliability in terms of the affected, contralateral and control breasts with the intra-class correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.948 to 0.999. Standard measurement error ranged from 0.04 to 0.28 °C, and minimum detectable change deviated from 0.11 to 0.78 °C. Moreover, low to moderate accuracy were observed in terms of the establishment of the breast cancer diagnosis with values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ranging from 0.571 and 0.749. Breasts affected by cancer present higher skin temperature compared to contralateral and control. Furthermore, excellent reliability of the analysis of the infrared images and low-moderate accuracy in terms diagnosis were observed. Considering the results, infrared thermography can be applied as an instrument complement the assessment of breast cancer patients, but not for diagnostic purposes.

Keywords

Skin temperature Breast cancer Diagnosis Sensitivity and specificity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards”.

Disclosures

This study received funding of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grants 2013/07227-0 and 2012/17907-6). The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Furthermore, this study has not been submitted to any other journal or conference.

References

  1. 1.
    Coleman, M.P., Quaresma, M., Berrino, F., Lutz, J.M., De Angelis, R., Capocaccia, R., et al., Cancer survival in five continents: A worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol. 9(8):730–756, 2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demin, E.V., and Merabishvili, V.M., Anticancer propaganda: Myth or reality? Vopr. Onkol. 60(1):96–101, 2014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Espié, M., The management of breast cancer. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 95(7–8):753–757, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hackelöer, B.J., Breast ultrasound - the 'gold standard' and other problems. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 11(6):385–387, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tubiana, M., and Koscielny, S., The rationale for early diagnosis of cancer--the example of breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 38(3):295–303, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elmore, P., Women's health. Preventative care is the key to healthier living. Posit. Living. 8(9):23, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crystal, P., Strano, S.D., Shcharynski, S., and Koretz, M.J., Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am. J. Roentgenol. 181:177–182, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hubbard, R.A., Kerlikowske, K., Flowers, C.I., Yankaskas, B.C., Zhu, W., and Miglioretti, D.L., Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: A cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(8):481–492, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braithwaite, D., Zhu, W., Hubbard, R.A., O'Meara, E.S., Miglioretti, D.L., Geller, B., et al., Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: Does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105(5):334–341, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerasimova, E., Audit, B., Roux, S.G., Khalil, A., Gileva, O., Argoul, F., et al., Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of dynamic infrared thermograms to assist in early breast cancer diagnosis. Front. Physiol. 5:176, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feig, S.A., Screening mammography benefit controversies: Sorting the evidence. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 52(3):455–480, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vreugdenburg, T.D., Willis, C.D., Mundy, L., and Hiller, J., A systematic review of elastography, electrical impedance scanning, and digital infrared thermography for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 137(3):665–676, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheel, J.R., Lee, J.M., Sprague, B.L., Lee, C.I., and Lehman, C.D., Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 212(1):9–17, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Health Quality Ontario, Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: An evidence-based analysis. Ont. Health Technol. Assess. Ser. 10(3):1–55, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magalhães, M.F., Dibai-Filho, A.V., Guirro, E.C.O., Girassol, C.E., Dias, F.R.C., and Guirro, R.R.J., Evolution of skin temperature after the application of compressive forces on tendon, muscle and myofascial trigger point. PLoS One. 12:2–8, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dibai-Filho, A.V., Guirro, E.C.O., Brandino, H.E., Vaz, M.M.O.L.L., and Guirro, R.R.J., Reliability of different methodologies of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Br. J. Physiot. 19:122–128, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wishart, G.C., Campisi, M., Boswell, M., Chapman, D., Shackleton, V., Iddles, S., et al., The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 36(6):535–540, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rassiwala, M., Mathur, P., Mathur, R., Farid, K., Shukla, S., Gupta, P.K., et al., Evaluation of digital infra-red thermal imaging as an adjunctive screening method for breast carcinoma: A pilot study. Int. J. Surg. 12(12):1439–1443, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ng, E.Y.K., A review of thermography as promising non-invasive detection modality for breast tumour. Intern. J. Thermal. Sci. 48(5):849–855, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brioschi, M.L., Macedo, J.F., and Macedo, R.A.C., Skin thermometry: New concepts. J. Vasc. Bras. 2:151–160, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    EtehadTavakol, M., and Ng, E.K., Breast thermography as a potential non-contact method in the early detection of cancer: A review. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 13:1330001–1330020, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    EtehadTavakol, M., Ng, E.Y.K., and Gheissari, N., Using shape contexts method for registration of contra lateral breasts in thermal images. World J. Clin. Oncol. 5(5):1055–1059, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    EtehadTavakol, M., Ng, E.Y.K., Lucas, C., Sadri, S., and Ataei, M., Nonlinear analysis using Lyapunov exponents in breast thermal images to identify abnormal lesions. Infrared Phys. Technol. 55(4):345–352, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kontos, M., Wilson, R., and Fentiman, I., Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) of breast lesions: Sensitivity and specificity of detection of primary breast cancers. Clin. Radiol. 66(6):536–539, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    EtehadTavakol, M., Sadri, S., and Ng, E.Y.K., Application of K- and fuzzy c-means for color segmentation of thermal infrared breast images. J. Med. Syst. 34(1):35–42, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Golestani, N., EtehadTavakol, M.E., and Ng, E.Y.K., Level set method for segmentation of infrared breast Thermograms. Exp. Clin. Sci. 13:241–251, 2014.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    EtehadTavakol, M., Ng, E.Y.K., Chandran, V., and Rabbani, H., Separable and non-separable discrete wavelet transform based texture features and image classification of breast thermograms. Infrared Phys. Technol. 61:274–286, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weir, J.P., Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19:231–240, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greiner, M., Pfeiffer, D., and Smith, R.D., Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev. Vet. Med. 30(45):23–41, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Akobeng, A.K., Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta. Pediatric. 96:644–647, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Costa, A.C., Dibai Filho, A.V., Packer, A.C., and Rodrigues-Bigaton, D., Intra and inter-rater reliability of infrared image analysis of masticatory and upper trapezius muscles in women with and without temporomandibular disorder. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 17(1):24–31, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Choi, E., Lee, P.B., and Nahm, F.S., Interexaminer reliability of infrared thermography for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. Skin Res. Technol. 19(2):189–193, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kottner, J., Audigé, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajewski, B.J., Hróbjartsson, A., et al., Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64(1):96–106, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro
    • 1
  • Maíta Marade Oliveira Lima Leite Vaz
    • 1
  • Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves
    • 1
  • Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho
    • 1
  • Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara
    • 2
  • Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, School of Medicine of Ribeirão PretoUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Postgraduate Program in Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Prédio da Fisioterapia e Terapia OcupacionalUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations