Accuracy and Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Assessment of the Breasts of Women Affected by Cancer
- 442 Downloads
Evaluate reliability and accuracy of infrared thermography in the assessment of women wth breasts cancer. Thirty-five participants had unilateral breast cancer and 17 control subjects were assessed using infrared thermography. To evaluate reliability, two professionals, who were experienced, measured the temperature of the infrared images in two different moments, with a one-week interval. Biopsy was used as a gold standard exam with regard identify breast cancer. The analysis illustrated excellent reliability in terms of the affected, contralateral and control breasts with the intra-class correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.948 to 0.999. Standard measurement error ranged from 0.04 to 0.28 °C, and minimum detectable change deviated from 0.11 to 0.78 °C. Moreover, low to moderate accuracy were observed in terms of the establishment of the breast cancer diagnosis with values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ranging from 0.571 and 0.749. Breasts affected by cancer present higher skin temperature compared to contralateral and control. Furthermore, excellent reliability of the analysis of the infrared images and low-moderate accuracy in terms diagnosis were observed. Considering the results, infrared thermography can be applied as an instrument complement the assessment of breast cancer patients, but not for diagnostic purposes.
KeywordsSkin temperature Breast cancer Diagnosis Sensitivity and specificity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards”.
This study received funding of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grants 2013/07227-0 and 2012/17907-6). The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Furthermore, this study has not been submitted to any other journal or conference.
- 8.Hubbard, R.A., Kerlikowske, K., Flowers, C.I., Yankaskas, B.C., Zhu, W., and Miglioretti, D.L., Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: A cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(8):481–492, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Braithwaite, D., Zhu, W., Hubbard, R.A., O'Meara, E.S., Miglioretti, D.L., Geller, B., et al., Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: Does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105(5):334–341, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Health Quality Ontario, Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: An evidence-based analysis. Ont. Health Technol. Assess. Ser. 10(3):1–55, 2010.Google Scholar
- 15.Magalhães, M.F., Dibai-Filho, A.V., Guirro, E.C.O., Girassol, C.E., Dias, F.R.C., and Guirro, R.R.J., Evolution of skin temperature after the application of compressive forces on tendon, muscle and myofascial trigger point. PLoS One. 12:2–8, 2015.Google Scholar
- 16.Dibai-Filho, A.V., Guirro, E.C.O., Brandino, H.E., Vaz, M.M.O.L.L., and Guirro, R.R.J., Reliability of different methodologies of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Br. J. Physiot. 19:122–128, 2015.Google Scholar
- 20.Brioschi, M.L., Macedo, J.F., and Macedo, R.A.C., Skin thermometry: New concepts. J. Vasc. Bras. 2:151–160, 2003.Google Scholar
- 26.Golestani, N., EtehadTavakol, M.E., and Ng, E.Y.K., Level set method for segmentation of infrared breast Thermograms. Exp. Clin. Sci. 13:241–251, 2014.Google Scholar