Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Clinical Practice Related to the Treatment of Pain. Influence on the Professional Activity and the Doctor-Patient Relationship

  • Jorge Muriel Fernandez
  • Maria Begoña García Cenador
  • J Manuel López Millan
  • Juan Antonio Juanes Méndez
  • María José Sánchez Ledesma
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Latest Technology Trends in Health Sciences (TEEM 2016)

Abstract

The increasing relevance of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in medical care is indisputable. This evidence makes it necessary to start studies that analyse the scope these new forms of access to information and understanding of medicine have on the professional activity of the physician, on the attitude and on the knowledge of patients or, on the doctor-patient relationship. The purpose of this study is to explore some of these aspects in a group of physicians whose clinical activity is related to one of the greatest social impact health problems which is the treatment of chronic pain. Starting with the completion of a questionnaire, in the study group it is observed that the interaction between social structure, increase of information flows and ICTs generate transformations in social practices and behaviour of the actors of the health system. Internet is confirmed as an information space on the subject, but is shown as an underutilized space of interaction between the doctor and his patient.

Keywords

Information and communication technologies Doctor-patient relationship Pain Continuous medical education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by an aid for research by the Cátedra Extraordinaria del Dolor “Fundación Grünenthal” of the University of Salamanca.

References

  1. 1.
    Nettleton, S., Burrows, R., and O’Malley, L., The mundane realities of the every day lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociology of Health & Illnes. 27:972–992, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Webster, A., Innovative health technologies and the social: Redefining health, medicine and the body. Curr. Sociol. 50:443–457, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Powell, J.A., Darvell, M., and Gray, J.A., The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: how the internet is changing healthcare. J. R. Soc. Med. 96:74–76, 2003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powell, J.A., Lowe, P., Griffiths, F.E., and Thorogood, M., A critical analysis of the literature on the internet and consumer health information. J. Telemed. Telecare. 11:41–43, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dear, B.F., Gandy, M., Karin, E., Staples, L.G., Johnston, L., Fogliati, V.J., Wootton, B.M., Terides, M.D., Kayrouz, R., Perry, K.N., Sharpe, L., Nicholas, M.K., and Titov, N., The pain course: a randomised controlled trial examining an internet-delivered pain management program when provided with different levels of clinician support. Pain. 156:1920–1935, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santana, S., Lausen, B., Bujnowska-Fedak, M., Chronaki, C., Kummervold, P.E., Rasmussen, J., and Sorensen, T., Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives. J. Med. Internet Res.12(2):e20, 2010. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1281 .2010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cuvillon, P., and Boisson, C., Teletherapeutic drug administration by long distance via internet control: Back to the future? Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim. 33:8–9, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Lima Verde Brito TD, Baptista RS, de Lima Lopes PR, Haddad AE, Messina LA, Torres Pisa I The collaborative coordination of special interest groups on the telemedicine university network (RUTE) in Brazil. Stud Health Technol 2015; 216:1010, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trompetter, H.R., Bohlmeijer, E.T., Veehof, M.M., and Schreurs, K.M., Internet-based guided self-help intervention for chronic pain based on acceptance and commitment therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J. Behav. Med. 38:66–80, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    OECD (2005) Health at a glance. OECD indicators 2005. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muriel Fernandez J (2015) Estudio de los usos de internet de los profesionales sanitarios vinculados en el tratamiento del dolor crónico. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca. En: gredos.usal.es/jspui/bitstream/10366/.../DC
  12. 12.
    Levy, J., and Strombeck, R., Health benefits and risk of the internet. J. Med. Syst. 26:495–510, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson, J.G., Rainey, M.R., and Eysenbach, G., The impact of cyber healthcare on the physician–patient relationship. J. Med. Syst. 27:67–83, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silver, M.P., Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(1):e19, 2015. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Love, T., Laier, C., Brand, M., Hatch, L., and Hajela, R., Neuroscience of internet addiction: A review and update. Behav. Sci. 18:388–433, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma, L., Kaye, A.D., Bean, M., and Vo, N., Ruan X (2015) a five-star doctor? Online rating of physicians by patients in an internet driven world. Pain Physician. 18:E15–E17, 2015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferguson, A.M., McLean, D., and Risko, E.F., Answers at your finger-tips: Access to the internet influences willingness to answer questions. Conscious. Cogn. 1:91–102, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mars, B., Heron, J., Biddle, L., Donovan, J.L., Holley, R., Piper, M., Potokar, J., Wyllie, C., and Gunnell, D., Exposure to, and searching for, information about suicide and self-harm on the internet: Prevalence and predictors in a population based cohort of young adults. J Affect Di- sord. 1:239–245, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schneider, L.H., and Hadjistavropoulos, H.D., When in doubt, ask the audience: potential users’ perceptions of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic pain. Pain Res. Manag. 19:173–178, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh, K., Neuroscience education on the internet: the next steps. Malays J Med Sci. 21:75–82, 2014.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nieto, R., Secondary prevention of chronic pain: can internet help. Pain Manag. 4:285–291, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Muriel Fernandez
    • 1
  • Maria Begoña García Cenador
    • 1
  • J Manuel López Millan
    • 2
  • Juan Antonio Juanes Méndez
    • 3
  • María José Sánchez Ledesma
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, School of MedicineUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  2. 2.Anestesiology ServiceUniversity Hospital Virgen MacarenaSevillaSpain
  3. 3.VisualMed Systems GroupUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations