Journal of Medical Systems

, 40:225 | Cite as

An ICT-Based Platform to Monitor Protocols in the Healthcare Environment

  • Víctor M. Alonso Rorís
  • Juan M. Santos Gago
  • Luis Álvarez Sabucedo
  • Mateo Ramos Merino
  • Javier Sanz Valero
Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Health Information Systems & Technologies

Abstract

Procedures from the healthcare domain involve highly critical actions as they may pose a risk for patients’ life. Therefore, a large effort is devoted to the standardization in clinical praxis and to the control of quality for these protocols in order to minimize hazards. In this line, this work is compelled to provide an ICT-based support to carry out these controls in a simple and effective manner. Using a methodology based on HACCP and taking advantage of Semantic tools, a holistic platform of services for traceability and control of processes has been designed and implemented. The applied paradigm is based on the use of Control Points as singular points to generate traces using observations and measures relevant for the processes considered. Based on those, it is possible to offer services for advanced querying and knowledge inference. The local deployment just requires regular mobile phones or tablets making this solution cost-effective and easily replicable.

Keywords

Traceability Monitoring eHealth HACCP Software platform Mobile environments 

References

  1. 1.
    Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., and Stanhope, N., Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 316:1154–1157, 1998. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woolf, S., Grol, R., Hutchinson, A., et al., Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 318:527–530, 1999. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pierson, M.D., HACCP: principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8818-0.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffith, C., Obee, P., and Cooper, R., The clinical application of hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP). Am. J. Infect. Control. 33:e39, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.04.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Codex Alimentarius Commision, Codex alimentarius. International Food Standards. http://www.codexalimentarius.org/. Accessed 22 August 2016, 2015.
  6. 6.
    National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods, Principles of risk assessment for illness caused by foodborne biological agents. J. Food Prot. 61:1071–1074, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 8402: 1995: quality management and quality assurance-vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, 1995 .Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yen, P.Y., and Gorman, P.N., Usability testing of a digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation. In: AMIA Annual Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, p. 844, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alonso-Rorís VM, Santos-Gago JM et al., A telematic based approach towards the normalization of clinical praxis. In the 4rd World Conference on Info Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST’16) pp. 659–668, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomlinson, M., Solomon, W., et al., The use of mobile phones as a data collection tool: a report from a household survey in South Africa. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9:51, 2009. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schobel J, Schickler M et al., Towards process-driven mobile data collection applications: requirements, challenges, lessons learned. International Conference on Web Inf. Sys. and Techn. pp. 371–382, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinman, A.R., Eichwald, J., et al., Integrating child health information systems. Am. J. Public Health. 95:1923–1927, 2005. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.051466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soh, C., Kien, S.S., and Tay-Yap, J., Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? Commun. ACM. 43:47–51, 2000. doi:10.1145/332051.332070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pryss R, Langer D et al., Mobile task management for medical ward rounds - the MEDo approach. International Conference on Business Process Management. pp. 43–54, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_6
  15. 15.
    Quinn, C.C., Clough, S.S., et al., WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 10(3):160–168, 2008. doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis R, Geiger B et al., Tracking blood products in blood centres using radio frequency identification: a comprehensive assessment. Vox Sang. 97(1):50–60, 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1423–0410.2009.01174.x
  17. 17.
    Vasquez A, Huerta M et al., Intelligent system for identification of patients in healthcare. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1449–1452, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_353
  18. 18.
    Villarreal, V., Hervás, R., and Bravo, J., A systematic review for mobile monitoring solutions in M-Health. J. Med. Syst. 40(9):199, 2016. doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0559-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Togt, R.V.D., Bakker, P.J.M., and Jaspers, M.W.M., A framework for performance and data quality assessment of Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) systems in health care settings. J. Biomed. Inform. 44(2):372–383, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boulos, M.N.K., Brewer, A.C., et al., Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J. Public Health Inf., 2014. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814.
  21. 21.
    Bendavid, Y., Boeck, H., and Philippe, R., RFID-enabled traceability system for consignment and high value products: a case study in the healthcare sector. J. Med. Syst. 36(6):3473–3489, 2012. doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9804-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fielding, R.T., Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. University of California, Irvine, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5):28–37, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, R.C., Huang, Y.H., et al., A recommendation system based on domain ontology and SWRL for anti-diabetic drugs selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(4):3995–4006, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prud’Hommeaux E, Seaborne A , SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C recommendation 15, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boullata, J., Overview of the parenteral nutrition use process. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 36:10S–13S, 2012. doi:10.1177/0148607111433624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boullata, J., Gilbert, K., Sacks, G., et al., A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: parenteral nutrition ordering, order review, compounding, labeling, and dispensing. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 38:334–377, 2014. doi:10.1177/0148607114521833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soria, B.B., García, M.M., et al., Development of the management for parenteral nutrition traceability in a standard hospital. Farm. Hosp. 39(n06):358–377, 2015. doi:10.7399/fh.2015.39.6.9689.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Günther CW, Verbeek H (2014) XES-standard definition. BPMcenter.org Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rojas, E., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M., and Capurro, D., Process mining in healthcare: A literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 61:224–236, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramos-Merino M, Sabucedo-Álvarez L et al., Extending BPMN model for improving expressiveness and machine-understandability. In the 4rd World Conference on Info Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST’16) pp. 297–306, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_28

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Víctor M. Alonso Rorís
    • 1
  • Juan M. Santos Gago
    • 1
  • Luis Álvarez Sabucedo
    • 1
  • Mateo Ramos Merino
    • 1
  • Javier Sanz Valero
    • 2
  1. 1.Telematic Engineering DepartmentUniversity of VigoVigoSpain
  2. 2.Public Health & History of ScienceUniversity Miguel HernandezAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations