Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 3555–3562 | Cite as

Physicians’ Views and Assessments on Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) in Two Turkish Public Hospitals

  • Mehmet TopEmail author
Original Paper


A picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is a medical imaging technology which provides economical storage of and convenient access to images from multiple modalities (source machine types). PACS have been widely introduced as a credible alternative to the traditional film-based radiological service. This study was planned and conducted to determine the physicians’ views and assessments on PACS in two public hospitals in Turkey. A questionnaire was prepared by viewing the literature related to PACS. The questionnaires were distributed several times to a total of 150 physicians two public hospitals in Ankara, Turkey. The overall response rate is 46%. Some questions required a graduated score in response and others an open ended response. The majority of physicians judged PACS to be a major advance for their hospitals with less frustration than using film high quality images and an improvement in their working lives and patient care. They reported that PACS gave them to radiology reports in short time. Also physicians believed that PACS has improved their consultations. Open ended questions were prepared with concerning the benefits and disadvantages of PACS. The assessments of the physicians demonstrated many more benefits than disadvantages of PACS in their hospitals. PACS has been accepted well by a wide percentage of hospital physicians. PACS evolves over time components are frequently replaced and so the users must expect continuous learning about new updates and improved functionality. The implementation of the PACS clearly contributes to an increase in the productivity of health professionals and physicians


Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Medical imaging Electronic health records 


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Faggioni, L., Neri, E., Castellana, C., Caramella, D., and Bartolozzi, C., The future of PACS in healthcare enterprises. Eur. J. Radiol. 78:253–258, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, Y., and Wang, J. PACS and digital medicine: essential principles and practical guidance. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pilling, J. R., Picture archiving and communication systems: users’ view. Br. J. Radiol. 79:519–524, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, B. J., Cao, F., Zhou, M. Z., Mogel, G., and Documet, L., Trends in PACS image storage and archive. Comput. Med Imaging and Graph. 27:165–174, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa, C., Oliveira, J. L., Silva, A., Ribeiro, V. G., and Ribeiro, J., Design, development, exploitation and assessment of a Cardiology Web PACS. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 93:273–282, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pynoo, B., Devoldera, P., Duyck, W., VanBraak, J., Sijnave, B., and Duyck, P., Do hospital physicians’ attitudes change during PACS implementation? A cross-sectional acceptance study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 81:88–97, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, H. K. PACS and imaging informatics basic principles and applications. Wiley, 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagy, P., George, B., Reiner, B. I., and Siegel, E. L., Defining the PACS profession: an initial survey of skills, training, and capabilities for pacs administrators. J. Digit. Imaging 18(4):252–259, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamsu, G., and Perez, E. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). 18(3):165–168, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lemke, H. U., PACS developments in Europe. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 27(2–3):111–120, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lemke, H. U., Short history of PACS (Part II: Europe). Eur. J. Radiol. 78:177–183, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choplin, R., Picture archiving and communication systems: an overview. Radiographics 12:127–129, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toms, A. P., Kasmai, B., Williams, S., and Wilson, P., Building an anonymized catalogued radiology museum in PACS: a feasibility study. Br. J. Radiol. 79:666–671, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mullins, M. E., Mehta, A., Patel, H., McLoud, T. C., and Novelline, R. A., Impact of PACS on the education of radiology residents: the residents’ perspective. Acad. Radiol. 8:67–73, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reiner, B. I., Siegel, E. L., Hooper, F., Pomerantz, S. M., Protopapas, Z., Pickar, E., et al., Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement. J. Digit Imaging 9:167–171, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bryan, S., Weatherburn, G. C., Watkins, J. R., and Buxton, M. J., The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users of radiology services. Br. J. Radiol. 72:469–478, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan, S., and Lewis, R. A., Picture archiving and communication systems: a multicentre survey of users experience and satisfaction. Eur. J. Radiol. 75(3):406–410, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacDonald, D. M. Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador. Dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watkins, J., A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur. J. Radiol. 32(2):106–112, 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maliff, R. P., and Launders, J., Using technology assessment as the picture archiving and communication system spreads outside radiology to the enterprise. J. Digit Imaging. 13(2):114–116, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mackinnon, A. D., Billington, R. A., Adam, E. J., Dundas, D. D., and Patel, U., Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit. Clin. Radiol. 63(7):796–804, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maass, M., Kosonen, M., and Kormano, M., Cost analysis of Turku University Central Hospital PACS in 1998. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed 66(1):41–45, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bryan, S., Weatherburn, G., Buxton, M., Watkins, J., Keen, J., and Muris, N., Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. J. Health Serv. Res. Pol. 4(4):204–209, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    You, J. Y., Yun, L., and Tu, J. V., Impact of picture archiving communication systems on rates of duplicate imaging: a before-after study. BMC Heal. Serv. Res. 8:234, 2008. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watkins, J., Weatherburn, G., and Bryan, S., The impact of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) upon an intensive care unit. Eur. J. Radiol. 34(1):3–8, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sacco, P., Mazzei, M., Pozzebon, E., and Stefani, P., PACS implementation in a university hospital in Tuscany. J Digit Imaging. 15(Suppl 1):250–251, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hendy, J., Reeves, B. C., Hutchings, A., et al., Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology: a qualitative study. Br. Med. J. 331:331–336, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhattacherjee, A., and Hikmet, N., Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. Eur. J. Inform. Syst 16:725–737, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ilie, V., VanSlyke, C., Parikh, M. A., and Courtney, J. F., Paper versus electronic medical records: the effects of access on physicians’ decisions to use complex information technologies. Decis. Sci. 40:213–241, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duyck, P., Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Adang, L., and Vercruysse, J., Do hospital physicians really want to go digital? Acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system in a university hospital. Fortschr. Röntg 180(7):631–638, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Health Care ManagementHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations