Abstract
As the need for knowledge exchange grows, so does the need to find new ways for researchers, decision makers, and educators to communicate and collaborate with each other on how to improve drug prescribing and use. In this paper, we introduce a conceptual framework for evaluating knowledge exchange activities within drug policy groups. The framework is grounded in the information and communication technologies (ICT) and knowledge exchange literature and is composed of various inputs, processes, and outputs. Inputs into the framework are research task, communication medium (face-to-face, teleconferencing, and web-conferencing), group characteristics (size, experience, goals, and roles), and context (description of linkage and exchange within the policy domain and group type). The inputs will affect how the social interaction process, knowledge brokering process, and information exchange process between drug policy groups (decision-makers, researchers, and educators) develop as part of the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process. The inputs and how they shape the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process will lead to different levels of engagement outputs and linkage and exchange outputs. Results of a refined conceptual framework based on a 2-year case study are also provided in the model where new inputs and processes are introduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg, B., Qualitative research methodology, 3rd edition. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1989.
Burke, K., Aytes, K., and Chidambaram, L., Media effect on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups. Inf. Technol. People. 14 (2)122–141, 2001.
Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Knowledge Translation Overview. Ottawa: [WWW page] http://www.cihrirsc.gc.ca/about_cihr/organization/knowledge_translation/resources/overview_e.shtml [Date of Use: 15 December 2004], 2002.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF), The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in Canada’s health system. Ottawa. [WWW page] http://www.chsrf.ca/brokering/pdf/Theory_and_Practice_e.pdf [Date of Use: 15 September 2004], 2004.
Clawson, V., Bostrom, R., and Anson, R., The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Res. 24 (4)524–547, 1993.
Dennis, A. R., Information exchange and use in small group decision-making. Small Group Res. 27 (4)532–550, 1996.
Huberman, M., Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. Am. Educ. Res. J. 27 (2)363–391, 1990.
Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., and Amundson, D., Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 34 (4)224–230, 2002.
Lau, F., and Hayward, R., Building a virtual network in a community health research training program. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7:361–377, 2000.
Landry, R., Lamara, M., and Amari, N., Climbing the ladder of research utilization. Sci. Commun. 22:396–422, 2001.
Lenfant, C., Shattuck lecture—Clinical research to clinical practice—Lost in translation? N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (9)868–874.
Lomas, J., Using “Linkage and Exchange” to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policy makers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health Aff. 18:236–240, 2000.
McGrath, J. E., Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
Mehta, V., Kushniruk, A., Gauthier, S., Richard, Y., Deland, E., Veilleux, M., and Grant, A., Use of evidence in the process of practice change in a clinical team: A study forming part of the Autocontrol project. Int. J. Med. Inf. 51:169–180, 1998.
Miranda, M. S., and Bostrom, P. R., The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 10 (3)63–96, 1993.
Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., and George, J. F., Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun. ACM. 34 (7)40–61, 1991.
Pinsonneault, A., and Kramer, K. L., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decis. Support Syst. 5 (2)197–216, 1989.
Rich, R. F., Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outputs. Knowl. Policy: Int. J. Knowl. Transf. Util. 3:11–24, 1997.
Rich, R., Knowledge creation diffusions and utilization. Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 12 (3)319–337, 1991.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. J. Dist. Educ. 14 (3)51–70, 2001.
Sambamurthy, V., Poole, M. S., and Kelly, J., The effects of variations in GDSS capabilities on decision making processes in groups. Small Group Res. 24 (4)523–546, 1993.
Straus, S., Technology, group process and group outputs: Testing the connections in computer mediated and face-to-face groups. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12 (3)227–266, 1997.
Tellis, W., Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report. 3(2). Retrieved, 1997.
December 20, 2005, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html
Yin, R. K., Case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2003.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Kerry Partriache from the School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada for her help in editing this document. She is a truly wonderful person.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Househ, M., Kushniruk, A., Cloutier-Fisher, D. et al. Technology Enabled Knowledge Exchange: Development of a Conceptual Framework. J Med Syst 35, 713–721 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9408-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9408-0