Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation in Home and Community Care

Journal of Medical Systems volume 34, pages 291–297 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Our research objective was to estimate the technical efficiency of regions in Ontario, Canada delivering home care relative to the ‘best performance’ frontier. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), an efficiency frontier technique, measured the technical efficiency of each geographically-defined Community Care Access Centre (CCAC) controlling for case-mix and service quality. Differences in case-mix and service quality did not fully explain the variation in efficiency scores across CCACs. Most CCACs in our sample were scale inefficient (i.e., not operating at an optimal size). The inability of home care providers to select patients or to adjust the service area is a potential explanation for the observed patterns in inefficiency. Efficiency analysis appears to represent an additional tool for use in assessing the performance of providers in the home and community care sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Peacock, S., Chan, C., Mangolini, M., and Johansen, D., Techniques for Measuring Efficiency in Health Services. Productivity Commission: Staff Working Paper, July, 2001.

  2. Romanow, R. J., Building on Value: the Future of Health Care in Canada. Final Report. Commission in the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002.

  3. Hollingsworth, B., The Measurement of Efficiency and Productivity of Health Care Delivery. Health Econ. 17:1007–1128, 2008. doi:10.1002/hec.1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Health Canada: The Canada Health Act: Overview. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/medi-assur/cha-lcs/overview-apercu_e.html. Accessed May 28, 2008.

  5. Health Canada: Home and Community Care. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/home-domicile/commun/index_e.html. Accessed May 28, 2008.

  6. Dumont-Lemasson, M., Donovan, C., and Wylie, M., Provincial and Territorial Home Care Programs: A Synthesis for Canada. Health Canada, 1999.

  7. Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres: http://www.ccac-ont.ca/Content.aspx?EnterpriseID=15&LanguageID=1&MenuID=45. Accessed May 1, 2008.

  8. Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres, Local Health Integration Networks: Building a True Systems. Bulletin No. 1—October 6, 2004, 2004.

  9. Caplan, E., Realizing the Potential of Home Care: Completing for Excellence by Rewarding Results. A Review of the Competitive Bidding Process Used by the Community, 2005.

  10. Williams, P., Barnsely, J., Leggat, S., Deber, R., Baranek, P., Long-term care goes to market: Managed competition and Ontario’s reform of community-based services. Can. J. Aging. 18(2):125–153, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abelson, J., Tedford Gold, S., Woodward, C., O’Connor, D., Hutchinson, B., Managing under managed community care: the experience of clients, providers and managers in Ontario’s competitive home care sector. Health Policy. 68(3):359–372, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Summary Report on Community-Based Services 2000/2001, 2004.

  13. Wonder, C.D.C., ICD-9 Codes. http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/sci%5Fdata/codes/icd9/type%5Ftxt/icd9cm.asp. Accessed: May 1, 2008.

  14. Ramanathan, R., An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement. Sage, 2003.

  15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2:429–444, 1978. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ray, S. C., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

  17. Grosskopf, S., and Valdmanis, V., Evaluating Hospital Performance with Case-Mix Adjusted Outputs. Med. Care. 31(6):525–532, 1993. doi:10.1097/00005650-199306000-00006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S., Reference Guide to OnFront2: The Professional Tool for Efficiency and Productivity Measurement. Economic Measurement and Quality Corportion, 2000.

  19. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C. A. K., Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

  20. Coelli, T., Rao, D. S., and O’Donell, C. H., Battese, G., An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd Edition. Springer, 2005.

  21. Bjorken, M. A., Fries, B. E., Hakkinen, U., and Brommels, M., Case-Mix Adjustment and Efficiency Measurement. Scand. J. Public Health. 32:464–471, 2004. doi:10.1080/14034940410028235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grosskopf, S., and Valdmanis, V., Evaluating Hospital Performance with Case-Mix Adjusted Outputs. Med. Care. 31(6):525–532, 1993. doi:10.1097/00005650-199306000-00006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Newhouse, J. P., Towards a Theory of Non-Profit Institutions: An Economic Model of a Hospital. Am. Econ. Rev. 60:64–74, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feldstein, P. J., Health Care Economics, 3rd Edition. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.

  25. Brown, A. D., Goldacre, M. J., Hicks, N., Rourke, J. T., McMurtry, R. Y., Brown, J. D., and Anderson, G. M., Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics. Can. J. Public Health. 92(2):155–159, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Health Indicators Report, 2003

  27. Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres, Local Health Integration Networks: Building a True Systems. Bulletin No. 1—October 6, 2004, 2004.

  28. O’Malley, K. J., Cook, K. F., Price, M. D., Wildes, K. R., Hurdle, J. F., and Ashton, C. M., Measuring Diagnoses: ICD Accuracy. Health Serv. Res. 40(5p2):1620–1639, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirdes, J. P., Fries, B. E., Morris, J. N., Ikegami, N., Zimmerman, D., Dalby, D. M., Aliaga, P., Hammer, S., and Jones, R., Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) Based on MDS-HC. Gerontologist. 44:665–679, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Barnebei, R., et al., RAI Home Care (RAI-HC) Assessment Manual© For Version 2.0; Primer on Use of the Minimum Data Set-Home Care (MDS-HC) Version 2.0© and the Client Assessment. Protocols (CAPs). Boston, USA: Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences for providing access to the Ontario Home Care Administration System database. This research was supported by funding from the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF)/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Research Training Award. We wish to acknowledge Diane Doran, Jan Barnsley and Kevin Brazil for their helpful comments and suggestions. Dr. Coyte is supported by funds from the CHSRF, CIHR, and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care for his Chair in Health Care Settings and Canadians.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5S8, Canada

    Julie Polisena

  2. Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Audrey Laporte & Peter C. Coyte

  3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services (ICES), Toronto, Canada

    Audrey Laporte, Peter C. Coyte & Ruth Croxford

  4. Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Peter C. Coyte

  5. CHSRF/CIHR Health Services Chair, Health Care, Technology and Place CIHR Strategic Training Program, Toronto, Canada

    Peter C. Coyte

Authors
  1. Julie Polisena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Audrey Laporte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter C. Coyte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruth Croxford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Polisena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polisena, J., Laporte, A., Coyte, P.C. et al. Performance Evaluation in Home and Community Care. J Med Syst 34, 291–297 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9240-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9240-y

Keywords

  • Home and community care
  • Data envelopment analysis
  • Evaluation
  • Efficiency
  • Health services delivery