Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Information Technologies Among Rural and Urban Physicians in Florida

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines rural–urban differences in the use of various information technologies (IT) applications by physicians in the ambulatory setting. Findings suggest that no differences exist between rural and urban physicians with respect to the use of a computer (77.4 vs 81.4; p = .144) or with the availability of an Internet connection (95.0 vs 96.5; p = .249) in the office. However, rural physicians were significantly less likely than urban doctors to indicate using e-mail with patients (7.9 vs 17.2%; p < .001) and slightly less likely to use a personal digital assistant (PDA) (32.3 vs 37.9; p = .091). Rural doctors were significantly less likely to indicate routinely using an electronic health records (EHR) system (17.6 vs 24.1; p = .020). EHR differences between rural and urban physicians were not significant (p = .124) in multivariate analyses and were explained away by practice size (p < .001) and practice type (p = .015). Most barriers to EHR did not differ between rural and urban physicians. However, rural physicians more commonly cited barriers associated with temporary disruptions to productivity or disruptions in access to records when computers systems fail. In sum, EHR use and patient e-mailing is less common in rural areas. While much of this variability can be explained by rural practice characteristics, these findings illustrate the need for further efforts to identify and alleviate barriers and encourage health IT adoption in rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, D. W., Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ, Br. Med. J. 320(7237):788–791, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan, P. F., and Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(3):257–262, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galt, K., Rich, E., and Young, W., Impact of hand-held technologies on medication errors in primary care. Top. Health Inf. Manag. 23:71–81, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaushal, R., Shojania, K., and Bates, D. W., Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety. Arch. Intern. Med. 163:1409–1416, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., and Kawasumi, Y., The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(5):505–516, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., et al., Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6):527–534, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, D., Wang, B., Wan, T., and Diana, M., Exploring hospitals’ adoption of information technology. J. Med. Syst. 26(4):349–355, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, R., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., and Clawson, A., Rural–urban difference in patient safety-related information technology utilization. J. Med. Syst. 29(2):103–109, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Calico, F., Dillard, C., Moscovice, I., and Wakefield, M., A framework and action agenda for quality improvementin rural health care. J. Rural Health 19(3):226–232, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ash, J. S., Gorman, P. N., Seshadri, V., and Hersh, W. R., Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: Results of a 2002 survey. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11(2):95–99, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menachemi, N., Burke, D., Clawson, A., and Brooks, R. G., Information technologies in Florida’s rural hospitals: Does system affiliation matter? J. Rural Health 21(3):263–268, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatcher, M., Impact of information systems on acute care hospitals: Results from a survey in the United States. J. Med. Syst. 22(6):379–387, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., et al., A cost–benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am. J. Med. 114(5):397–403, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper, J. Organization, management, implementation and value of EHR implementation in a solo pediatric practice. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 18(3):51–55, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Makoul, G., Curry, R. H., and Tang, P. C., The use of electronic medical records: Communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6):610–615, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Audet, A. M., Doty, M. M., Peugh, J., Shamasdin, J., Zapert, K., and Schoenbaum, S., Information technologies: When will they make it into physicians’ black bags? MedGenMed. 6(4):2, Dec 6 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burt, C. W., and Hing, E., Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001–03. Adv. Data 353:1–8, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andrews, J. E., Pearce, K. A., Sydney, C., Ireson, C., and Love, M., Current state of information technology use in a US primary care practice-based research network. Inform. Prim. Care 12(1):11–18, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell, R. M. Jr., and Thakker, N. R., If electronic medical records are so great, why aren’t family physicians using them? J. Fam. Pract. 51(7):636–641, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, R. H., and Sim, I., Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood, Va.) 23(2):116–126, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., and Dowd, B., Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff. (Millwood, Va.) 24(5):1323–1333, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menachemi, N., and Brooks, R. G., EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: Results of a large-scale statewide analysis. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 20(3):79–87, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Menachemi, N., Perkins, R., Van Durme, D., and Brooks, R., Examining the adoption of EHR and PDA use by family physicians in Florida. Informatics in Primary Care 14(1):1–9, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Menachemi, N., Matthews, M. C., Ford, E. W., and Brooks, R. G., The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Manage. Rev. 32(2):111–118, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morrill, R., Cromartie, J., and Hart, L., Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: Toward a better depiction of the U.S. settlement system. Urban Geogr. 20(8):727–748, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aspden, P., Patient safety achieving a new standard for care. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Car, J., and Sheikh, A., Email consultations in health care: 1 – scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 329(7463):435–438, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patt, M. R., Houston, T. K., Jenckes, M. W., Sands, D. Z., and Ford, D. E., Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: A qualitative exploration. J. Med. Internet Res. 5(2):e9, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Menachemi, N., Hikmet, N., Stutzman, M., and Brooks, R., Investigating response bias in a health information technology survey of physicians. J. Med. Syst. 30(4):277–282, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Overhage, J. M., Evans, L., and Marchibroda, J., Communities’ readiness for health information exchange: The national landscape in 2004. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(2):107–112, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The analysis of this project was funded by the Office of Rural Health, Florida Department of Health. Data collection was funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services, Under Contract Number 500-02 FL02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Medicine, Florida State University, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4300, USA

    Nir Menachemi, Adam Langley & Robert G. Brooks

Authors
  1. Nir Menachemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam Langley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert G. Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nir Menachemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menachemi, N., Langley, A. & Brooks, R.G. The Use of Information Technologies Among Rural and Urban Physicians in Florida. J Med Syst 31, 483–488 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9088-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9088-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation