Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing GIS-Based Methods of Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Health Services

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inequitable geographic distribution of health care resources has long been recognized as a problem in the United States. Traditional measures, such as a simple ratio of supply to demand in an area or distance to the closest provider, are easy measures for spatial accessibility. However the former one does not consider interactions between patients and providers across administrative borders and the latter does not account for the demand side, that is, the competition for the supply. With advancements in GIS, however, better measures of geographic accessibility, variants of a gravity model, have been applied. Among them are (1) a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method and (2) a kernel density (KD) method. This microscopic study compared these two GIS-based measures of accessibility in our case study of dialysis service centers in Chicago. Our comparison study found a significant mismatch of the accessibility ratios between the two methods. Overall, the 2SFCA method produced better accessibility ratios. There is room for further improvement of the 2SFCA method—varying the radius of service area according to the type of provider or the type of neighborhood and determining the appropriate weight equation form—still warrant further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guagliardo MF, Ronzio CR, Cheung I, Chacko E, Joseph JG (2004) Physician accessibility: An urban case study of pediatric primary care. Health Place 10:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O'Neill L (2003) Estimating out-of-hospital mortality due to myocardial infarction. Health Care Manage Sci 6:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortney J, Rost K, Zhang M, Warren J (1999) The impact of geographic accessibility on the intensity and quality of depression treatment. Med. Care 37(9):884–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadley J, Cunningham P (2004) Availability of safety net providers and access to care of uninsured persons. Health Serv Res 39(5):1527–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lovetta A, Haynesa R, Sunnenberga G, Galeb S, (2002) Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: A study using patient registers and GIS. Soc Sci Med 55:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin CG, Wyszewianski L (2002) Access to care: Remembering old Lessons. Health Serv Res 37(6):1441–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Radke J, Mu L (2000) Spatial decomposition, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs. Geogr. Inform Sci 6:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luo W, Wang F (2003) Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in Chicago region. Environment and Planning B 30(6):865–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Health Statistics, (2002) Inventory of Health Care Facilities and Services and Need Determinations, Hospitals and Associated Services, vol. 1, Parts I-V., Illinois Department of Public Health, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Bureau of Census (2000) Census Summary File 1

  11. Apparicio P, Shearmur R, Brochu M, Dussault G (2003) The measure of distance in a social science policy context: Advantages and costs of using network distances in eight Canadian Metropolitan areas. J Geogr Inform Decision Anal 7(2):105–131

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang F (2005) Measuring distances and time. In Wang F, Albert DP, Albrecht J (eds.) Quantitative Methods and Applications in GIS, Chap. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guagliardo MF (2004) Spatial accessibility of primary care: Concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr 3(3):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang F (2005) GIS-based measures of spatial accessibility and application in examining health care access. In Wang F, Albert DP, Albrecht J (eds.) Quantitative Methods and Applications in GIS, Chap. 5, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guptill SC (1975) The spatial availability of physicians. Proc Assoc Am Geogr 7:80–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. United States General Accounting Office (2004) Medicare dialysis facilities: Beneficiary access table and problems in payment system being addressed, June

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

    Duck-Hye Yang & Robert Goerge

  2. Health Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

    Ross Mullner

Authors
  1. Duck-Hye Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Goerge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ross Mullner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duck-Hye Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, DH., Goerge, R. & Mullner, R. Comparing GIS-Based Methods of Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Health Services. J Med Syst 30, 23–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-7400-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-7400-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation