Skip to main content

A 12-year Analysis of Malmquist Total Factor Productivity in Dialysis Facilities

Journal of Medical Systems volume 30, pages 333–342 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examined total factor productivity of dialysis facilities in Greece over a 12-year period, using nationally representative panel data. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to compute Malmquist productivity indices, which were decomposed into technical efficiency change and technological change. The sample consisted of 73 dialysis facilities operating throughout the entire study period (1993–2004), corresponding to 97.3% and 58.9% of all facilities in the first and last study years respectively. Production variables were nursing staff and dialysis machines (inputs) and dialysis sessions (output). The DEA model was input-oriented allowing for constant returns to scale (CRS). Technical efficiency change was decomposed into scale efficiency change and variable returns to scale (VRS) “pure” technical efficiency change. Mean overall efficiency, throughout the study years, ranged from 39.6 to 63.1% with an all-time average of 56.7%, and only 2–4% of the facilities were fully efficient in each study year. Productivity indices indicated year-by-year progress or regress up to 5%, but the efficiency and technological components differed, in some cases, by as much as 30%. Although interesting subperiod effects were observed, conclusions could not be generalized for the entire study period due to alternating trends. We suggest that preliminary insight to productivity in this sector has been obtained, but particular subperiods must be isolated and further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Kontodimopoulos, N., Niakas, D., and Mylonakis, J., A socio-economic evaluation of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Greece. Int. J. Healthc. Technol. Manage. 6:296–306, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D., Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in Greece with data envelopment analysis. Health Policy 71:195–204, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3:429–444, 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30:1078–1092, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Giuffrida, A., and Gravelle, H., Measuring performance in primary care: Econometric analysis and DEA. Appl. Econ. 33:163–175, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thanassoulis, E., and Zanakis, S. H., DEA and its use in different countries. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154:337–344, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowlin, W. F., Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). J. Cost Anal. 3:3–27, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollingsworth, B., Dawson, P., and Maniadakis, N., Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:161–172, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollingsworth, B., Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Manage. Sci. 6:203–218, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: An examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs. Health Serv. Res. 37:711–732, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerard, K., and Roderick, P., Comparison of apparent efficiency of haemodialysis satellite units in England and Wales using data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Technol. Assess.19:533–539,2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., and Diewert, W. E., The econometric theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414, 1982.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., and Roos, P., Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. J. Prod. Anal. 3:85–101, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell, M. J., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc., Series A:252–281, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhang, Z., Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:66–83, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Diewert, W. E., Fisher ideal output, input and productivity indexes revisited. J. Prod. Anal. 3:211–248, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balk, B. M., Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes: Comment. Econ. J. 103:680–682, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grosskopf, S., Some remarks on productivity and its decompositions. J. Prod. Anal. 20:459–474, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tambour, M., The impact of health care policy initiatives on productivity. Health Econ. 6:57–70, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Linna, M., Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models. Health Econ. 7:415–427, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giuffrida, A., Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: A Malmquist index approach. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:11–26, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommersguter-Reichmann, M., The impact of the Austrian hospital financing reform on hospital productivity: Empirical evidence on efficiency and technology changes using a non-parametric input-based Malmquist approach. Health Care Manage. Sci. 3:309–321, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Staat, M., The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners—A Malmquist index approach. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4:232–238, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets. Health Care Manage. Sci. 7:253–261, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, P., Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:233–252, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Held, P. J., and Pauly, M. V., Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease program. J. Health Econ. 2:95–118, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W. W., and Golany, B., A development study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in U. S. Air Forces. Ann. Oper. Res. 2:95–112, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Torgersen, A. M., Forsund, F. R., and Kittlesen, S. A., Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J. Prod. Anal. 7:379–398, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheel's DEA Website. Retrieved March 19, 2005, from http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/ems/

  30. Andersen, P., and Petersen, N. C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39:1261–1264, 1993.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Banker, R. D., and Chang, H., Evaluating the superefficiency procedure in data envelopment analysis for outlier identification and for ranking efficient units. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas, 2000.

  32. Ioannidis, G., Papadaki, O., and Tsakiris, D., Statistical and epidemiological data of the renal replacement therapy in Greece 1986–2000. Report of the Hellenic Renal Registry (in Greek). Hell. Nephrol. 14:525–548, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Griffiths, R. I., Powe, N. R., Gaskin, D. J., Anderson, G. F., de Lissovoy, G. V., and Whelton, P. K., The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities. Health Serv. Res. 29:473–487, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tountas, Y., Karnaki, P., and Pavi, E., Reforming the reform: The Greek national health system in transition. Health Policy 62:15–29, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., and Dyson, R. G., Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:588–607, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng, Y. S., and Lo, D., Firm size, technical efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese industry. Working Paper, University of London, 2004.

  37. Nin, A., Arndt, C., and Preckel, P. V., Is agricultural productivity in developing countries really shrinking? New evidence using a modified nonparametric approach. J. Dev. Econ. 71:395–415, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. G. Ioannidis and Ms. O. Papadaki of the Hellenic Board of Registry Coordination and Control of RRT for kindly providing us with the extremely large amount of data required for this study and for assisting in its interpretation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Riga Feraiou 169 & Tsamadou, 26222, Patras, Greece

    Nick Kontodimopoulos & Dimitris Niakas

Authors
  1. Nick Kontodimopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitris Niakas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Kontodimopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kontodimopoulos, N., Niakas, D. A 12-year Analysis of Malmquist Total Factor Productivity in Dialysis Facilities. J Med Syst 30, 333–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-9005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-9005-9

Keywords

  • Data envelopment analysis
  • Malmquist productivity index
  • Efficiency
  • Dialysis
  • Greece