Abstract
The proof of Lemma 5 in de Frutos et al. (J Sci Comput 80: 1330–1368, 2019) is not correct. An alternative statement of Lemma 5 and its proof is provided. With this new statement the order of convergence of the pressure is reduced by one half order in the spatial mesh size. Changes in the results relying Lemma 5 are also provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Constantin, P., Foias, C.: Navier–Stokes Equations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)
de Frutos, J., García-Archilla, B., Novo, J.: Fully discrete approximations to the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations with a projection method in time and grad-div stabilization. J. Sci. Comput. 80, 1330–1368 (2019)
Galdi, G.P.: An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations, vol. I. Springer, New York, Linearized Steady Problems (1994)
Verfürth, R.: A posteriori error estimators for convection? Diffusion equations. Numer. Math. 80, 641–663 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Frutos, J., García-Archilla, B. & Novo, J. Corrigenda: Fully Discrete Approximations to the Time-dependent Navier–Stokes Equations with a Projection Method in Time and Grad-div Stabilization. J Sci Comput 88, 40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-021-01551-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-021-01551-7