Skip to main content
Log in

Not all size measures are created equal: different body size proxies are not equivalent fitness predictors in the bat Carollia perspicillata

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Mammalian Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Body size variation can have important evolutionary, physiological, functional, and ecological consequences. Body mass is a widely used size measure across different taxonomic groups, but it combines skeletal size with nutritional and reproductive status. In bats, forearm length is commonly used as a measure of skeletal size. However, body mass and forearm length are poorly correlated within species. This suggests that the two size variables are measuring different biological attributes. Here, we tested this hypothesis by evaluating the association between body mass, forearm length, and fitness components (survival and reproduction), derived from mark-recapture models, as well as their trends over a nine-year period in a population of short-tailed bats (Carollia perspicillata). Results showed a direct relationship between body mass, survival, and reproduction, and an inverse relationship between forearm length, survival, and reproduction. Different temporal trends in the size variables were observed according to sex and age. Males showed a trend of increasing average mass over the years. In adults, average forearm length decreased over the years, whereas juveniles showed an increasing trend. Our results showed that body mass and forearm length have distinct evolutionary dynamics and proximal mechanisms of change. Forearm length is a measure of wing size and should not be used as a proxy for body size in intraspecific studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and R scripts are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10601060).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank W. Costa-Jr and G. L. de Carvalho (RBU administrators) and ICMBio staff for providing support. We also thank R. B. Lyra, K. Urbanowski, L. B. Mayer, J. M. Bubadué, and N. B. Melo for help with the field work. Previous versions of this manuscript were improved by the comments of E. Bernard and A. P. Cruz-Neto.

Funding

This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, and Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.R.M., B. M., and M.R.N. designed the research. All authors participated in all aspects of fieldwork and data collection. B.M. and L.R.M analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing of the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Breno Mellado or Leandro Rabello Monteiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mellado, B., de Oliveira Carneiro, L., Nogueira, M.R. et al. Not all size measures are created equal: different body size proxies are not equivalent fitness predictors in the bat Carollia perspicillata. J Mammal Evol 31, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09702-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09702-x

Keywords

Navigation