Advertisement

Absence of Relationship between Mitochondrial DNA Evolutionary Rate and Longevity in Mammals except for CYTB

  • Ping Feng
  • Qihai Zhou
Original Paper

Abstract

On the relationship between mitochondrion and longevity in mammals, two viewpoints have been proposed: one found that the amino acid substitution rates of most of the mitochondrial DNA-coding peptides were positively correlated with longevity, while the other raised the opposite view. To resolve this dichotomy, and to explore the relationship between mtDNA evolution and longevity in mammals, we examined this relationship in 85 mammal species, at the nucleotide sequence level. Previous studies have demonstrated that phylogenetic inertia, substitution saturation, and body mass can affect the relationship between longevity and substitution rate. Therefore, analyses should take these factors into account. This study found that after controlling the aforementioned factors, no significant positive or negative relationship existed between mitochondrial DNA evolutionary rate and longevity except for CYTB, partly agreeing with a previous study. Variations of longevity can be explained partly by the evolutionary rate of CYTB, but other influencing factors still need to be studied in the future.

Keywords

MtDNA evolutionary rate Longevity Mammals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (grant no. 31500310 to P.F.); the Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Guangxi Province, China (grant no. KY2015ZD016 to P.F.); a Start-up Fund, and a Development Support Program for Young Scholar from Guangxi Normal University to P.F.

Supplementary material

10914_2017_9399_MOESM1_ESM.docx (44 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 44 kb)

References

  1. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D (2005) ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21:2104–2105Google Scholar
  2. Barja G, Herrero A (2000) Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA is inversely related to maximum life span in the heart and brain of mammals. Faseb J 14:312–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennettand PM, Harvey PH (2009) Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, phylogeny and ecology. J Zool 213:327–344Google Scholar
  4. Bromham L, Rambaut A, Harvey PH (1996) Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution. J Mol Evol 43:610–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown-Borg HM (2007) Hormonal regulation of longevity in mammals. Ageing Res Rev 6:28–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Capellini I, Venditti C, Barton R (2010) Phylogeny and metabolic scaling in mammals. Ecology 91:2783–2793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crofts AR, Lhee S, Crofts SB,Cheng J, Rose S (2006) Proton pumping in the bc1 complex: a new gating mechanism that prevents short circuits. Biochim Biophy Acta 1757:1019–1034Google Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng P, Zhao HB, Lu X (2015) Evolution of mitochondrial DNA and its relation to basal metabolic rate. Mitochondrial Dna 26:566–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher DO, Owens IP (2004) The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:391–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Galtier N, Enard D, Radondy Y, Bazin E, Belkhir K (2006) Mutation hot spots in mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Genome Res 16:215–222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Galtier N, Blier PU, Nabholz B (2009) Inverse relationship between longevity and evolutionary rate of mitochondrial proteins in mammals and birds. Mitochondrion 9:51–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey D, Pagel MD (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasegawa M, Cao Y, Yang ZH (1998) Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: non-synonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol Biol Evol 15:1499–1505Google Scholar
  17. Hutter B, Bieg M, Helms V, Paulsen M (2010) Divergence of imprinted genes during mammalian evolution. BMC Evol Biol 10:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kujoth GC, Bradshaw P, Haroon S, Prolla T (2007) The role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in mammalian aging. PLoS Genet 3:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li WH, Tanimura M, Sharp P (1987) An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences. J Mol Evol 25:330–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Maddison WP, Maddison DRV (2009) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org (Accessed 3 October 2011)
  21. Martin AP ( 1995) Metabolic rate and directional nucleotide substitution in animal mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol 12:1124–1131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin AP, Palumbi S (1993) Body size, metabolic-rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4087–4091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McNab B (2008) An analysis of the factors that influence the level and scaling of mammalian BMR. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 151:5–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mooers AO, Harvey P (1994) Metabolic rate, generation time, and the rate of molecular evolution in birds. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:344–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller DWH, Codron D, Werner J, Fritz J, Hummel J, Griebeler EM, Clauss M (2012) Dichotomy of eutherian reproduction and metabolism. Oikos 121:102–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy WJ, Pringle TH, Crider TA, Springer MS, Miller W (2007) Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Res 17:413–421CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nabholz B, Glémin S, Galtier N (2008) Strong variations of mitochondrial mutation rate across mammals--the longevity hypothesis. Mol Biol Evol 25:120–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nunn GB, Stanley S (1998) Body size effects and rates of cytochrome b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds. Mol Biol Evol 15:1360–1371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohta T (1993) An examination of the generation-time effect on molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10676–10680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rottenberg H (2006) Longevity and the evolution of the mitochondrial DNA-coded proteins in mammals. Mech Ageing Dev 127:748–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rottenberg H (2007a) Coevolution of exceptional longevity, exceptionally high metabolic rates, and mitochondrial DNA-coded proteins in mammals. Exp Gerontol 42:364–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rottenberg H (2007b) Exceptional longevity in songbirds is associated with high rates of evolution of cytochrome b, suggesting selection for reduced generation of free radicals. J Exp Biol 210:2170–2180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rottenberg H (2009) Longevity and the early evolution of mtDNA-coded proteins in placental mammals. Mitochondrion 9:282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rottenberg H (2014) Exceptional longevity and exceptionally high metabolic rates in anthropoid primates are linked to a major modification of the ubiquinone reduction site of cytochrome b. J Bioenerg Biomembr 46:435–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen YY, Shi P, Sun YB, Zhang YP (2009) Relaxation of selective constraints on avian mitochondrial DNA following the degeneration of flight ability. Genome Res 19:1760–1765CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Speakman J (2005) Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J Exp Biol 208:1717–1730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739Google Scholar
  38. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882Google Scholar
  39. Tranah GJ (2011) Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis: implications for human aging and longevity. Ageing Res Rev 10:238–252Google Scholar
  40. Wang Z, Yonezawa T, Liu B, Ma T, Shen X, Su J, Guo S, Hasegawa M, Liu J (2011) Domestication relaxed selective constraints on the yak mitochondrial genome. Mol Biol Evol 28:1553–1556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang ZH (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, Guangxi Normal UniversityGuilinChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of EducationGuilinChina

Personalised recommendations