Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 277–289 | Cite as

Vertical Locomotion in Micromys minutus (Rodentia: Muridae): Insights into the Evolution of Eutherian Climbing

  • Nikolaos-Evangelos KarantanisEmail author
  • Leszek Rychlik
  • Anthony Herrel
  • Dionisios Youlatos
Original Paper


Climbing is integral to scansorial and arboreal lifestyles as it enables access to and vertical ranging within the arboreal strata. As early eutherian mammals exhibit osteological correlates for arboreality, it is important to assess the behavioral mechanisms that are related to competent vertical climbing. In this context, we examined climbing gaits in one of the smallest extant rodents, the Eurasian harvest mouse. For these purposes, we filmed six adult Micromys minutus at 240 fps moving on four different substrate sizes (2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 25 mm), during both vertical ascents and descents. All climbing cycles were lateral sequence slow gaits. Upward climbing was characterized by a higher contribution of the hind limbs, longer swing phases, and a significant involvement of stride frequency in velocity modulation. On the other hand, downward climbing was promoted by employing gaits of even lower diagonality, an increased contact with the substrate, enhanced role of the forelimbs, and a subtler modulation of velocity by stride frequency. Eurasian harvest mice effectively negotiate the finest substrates, but their effectiveness decreased significantly on the largest ones. The morphofunctional similarities of M. minutus to Juramaia sinensis and Eomaia scansoria imply analogous behaviors in early eutherians, which apparently contributed to the successful access and exploitation of the fine-branch arboreal milieu. In this way, extant small arboreal mammals can constitute good models for elucidating and comprehending the adaptive significance of behavioral mechanisms that are related to the evolution of arboreality in early mammals.


Gaits Eutherian evolution Arboreality Gait Small body size Rodent 



All authors wish to express their gratitude to all the people who helped throughout this project: the staff of the Nowe Zoo of Poznan for granting permission and providing the specimens, as well as their invaluable help and patience throughout the experimental procedures, Peter Klimant for his extensive assistance in the experiments, and Doug Brown for essential modifications to the Tracker software that made data analysis possible. Two anonymous reviewers and the editor-in-chief, Dr. John Wible, provided feedback that greatly improved an earlier version of this manuscript. Financial support was provided through funds by the Erasmus studies scholarships to NEK, the School of Biology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and the Department of Systematic Zoology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Animals

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The present research strictly adhered to the guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioral research and teaching (ASAB/ABS 2012) and complied with relevant regulations and legislations of the Nowe Zoo and the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan and the relevant legislation of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Handling, housing of animals and behavioral tests were carried out with permission by the Local Ethical Commission for the Animal Experiments in Poznan.

Informed Consent

No human subjects participated in the experiments of this study.


  1. Alexander RM (1977) Terrestrial locomotion. In: Alexander RM, Goldspink G (eds) Mechanics and Energetics of Animal Locomotion. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 168–203Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RM (1992) Exploring Biomechanics: Animals in Motion. Scientific American Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander RM, Jayes AS (1983) A dynamic similarity hypothesis for the gaits of quadrupedal mammals. J Zool 201:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold SJ (1983) Morphology, performance and fitness. Am Zool 23:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASAB/ABS (2012) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 83:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bence SL, Stander K, Griffiths M (2003) Habitat characteristics of harvest mouse nests on arable farmland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bi S, Wang Y, Guan J, Sheng, X, Meng, J (2014) Three new Jurassic euharamiyidan species reinforce early divergence of mammals. Nature 514:579–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonnan MF, Shulman J, Varadharajan R, Gilbert C, Wilkes M, Horner A, Brainerd E (2016) Forelimb kinematics of rats using XROMM, with implications for small eutherians and their fossil relatives. PLoS One 11:e0149377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown D (2009) Tracker video analysis and modeling tool. October 3, 2013Google Scholar
  10. Camargo NF, Sano NY, Ribeiro JF, Vieira EM (2016) Contrasting the realized and fundamental niche of the arboreal walking performance of neotropical rodents. J Mammal 97:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cartmill M (1974a) Pads and claws in arboreal locomotion. In: Jenkins FA Jr (ed) Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York, pp 45–83Google Scholar
  12. Cartmill M (1974b) Rethinking primate origins. Science 184:436–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartmill M (1985) Climbing. In: Hildebrand M, Bramble DM, Liem KF, Wake DB (eds) Functional Vertebrate Morphology. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp 73–88Google Scholar
  14. Cartmill M, Lemelin P, Schmitt D (2002) Support polygons and symmetrical gaits in mammals. Zool J Linn Soc 136:401–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cartmill M, Lemelin P, Schmitt D (2007) Primate gaits and primate origins. In: Ravosa M, Dagosto M (eds) Primate Origins: Adaptations and Evolution. Springer, New York, pp 403–435Google Scholar
  16. Delciellos AC, Vieira MV (2006) Arboreal walking performance in seven didelphid marsupials as an aspect of their fundamental niche. Austral Ecol 31:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delciellos AC, Vieira MV (2007) Stride lengths and frequencies of arboreal walking in seven species of didelphid marsupials. Acta Theriol 52:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delciellos AC, Vieira MV (2009) Allometric, phylogenetic, and adaptive components of climbing performance in seven species of didelphid marsupials. J Mammal 90:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demes B, Larson SG, Stern JT Jr, Jungers WL, Biknevicius AR, Schmitt D (1994) The kinetics of primate quadrupedalism: “hindlimb drive” reconsidered. J Hum Evol 26:353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer MS, Schilling N, Schmidt M, Haarhaus D, Witte H (2002) Basic limb kinematics of small therian mammals. J Exp Biol 205:1315–1338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Franz TM, Demes B, Carlson KJ (2005) Gait mechanics of lemurid primates on terrestrial and arboreal substrates. J Hum Evol 48:199–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaetano LC, Rougier GW (2011) New materials of Argentoconodon fariasorum (Mammaliaformes, Triconodontidae) from the Jurassic of Argentina and its bearing on triconodont phylogeny. J Vertebr Paleontol 31:829–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gasc J-P (2001) Comparative aspects of gait, scaling and mechanics in mammals. Comp Biochem Physiol - Part A Mol & Integr Physiol 131:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haffner M (1996) A tendon-locking mechanism in two climbing rodents, Muscardinus avelfanarius and Micromys minutus (Mammalia, Rodentia). J Morph 227:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haffner M (1998) A comparison of the gross morphology and micro-anatomy of the foot pads in two fossorial and two climbing rodents (Mammalia). J Zool 244:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanna JB (2006) Kinematics of vertical climbing in lorises and Cheirogaleus medius. J Hum Evol 50:469–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanna JB, Schmitt D (2011) Locomotor energetics in primates: gait mechanics and their relationship to the energetics of vertical and horizontal locomotion. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:43–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrell FE (2001) Regression Modeling Strategies: with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris S (1970) The Secret Life of the Harvest Mouse. Hamlyn, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris S (1979a) History, distribution, status and habitat requirements of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in Britain. Mammal Rev 9:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris S (1979b) Breeding season, litter size and nestling mortality of the harvest mouse, Micromys minutus (Rodentia: Muridae), in Britain. J Zool 188:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hesse B, Nyakatura JA, Fischer MS, Schmidt M (2014) Adjustments of limb mechanics in cotton-top tamarins to moderate and steep support orientations: significance for the understanding of early primate evolution. J Mammal Evol 22:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hildebrand M (1967) Symmetrical gaits of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hildebrand M (1968) Symmetrical gaits of dogs in relation to body build. J Morphol 124:353–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hildebrand M (1976) Analysis of tetrapod gaits: general considerations and symmetrical gaits. In: Herman RM, Grillner S, Stein PSG, Stuart DG (eds) Neural Control of Locomotion. Plenum Press, New York, pp 203–236Google Scholar
  36. Hildebrand M (1995) Analysis of Vertebrate Structure, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirasaki E, Kumakura H, Matano S (1993) Kinesiological characteristics of vertical climbing in Ateles geoffroy and Macaca fuscata. Folia Primatol 61:148–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirasaki E, Kumakura H, Matano S (2000) Biomechanical analysis of vertical climbing in the spider monkey and the Japanese macaque. Am J Phys Anthropol 113:455–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirasaki E, Matano S, Nakano Y, Ishida H (1992) Vertical climbing in Ateles geoffroyi and Macaca fuscata and its comparative neurological background. In: Matano S, Tuttle RD, Ishida H, Goodman M (eds) Topics in Primatology, Vol. 3: Evolutionary Biology, Reproductive Endocrinology, and Virology. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 156–165Google Scholar
  40. Hof AL (1996) Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture 4:222–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoyt DF, Wickler SJ, Cogger EA (2000) Time of contact and step length: the effect of limb length, running speed, load carrying and incline. J Exp Biol 203:221–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunt KD, Cant JGH, Gebo DL, Rose MD, Walker SE, Youlatos D (1996) Standardized descriptions of primate locomotor and postural modes. Primates 37:363–387Google Scholar
  43. Ishiwaka R, Mori T (1999) Early development of climbing skills in harvest mice. Anim Behav 58:203–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Isler K (2004) Footfall patterns, stride length and speed of vertical climbing in spider monkeys (Ateles fusciceps robustus) and woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha). Folia Primatol 75:133–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Isler K (2005) 3D-kinematics of vertical climbing in hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:66–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Isler K, Thorpe SKS (2003) Gait parameters in vertical climbing of captive, rehabilitant and wild Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii). J Exp Biol 206:4081–4096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jędrzejewska B, Jędrzejewski W (1990) Antipredatory behaviour of bank voles and prey choice of weasels - enclosure experiments. Ann Zool Fennici 27:321–328Google Scholar
  48. Jędrzejewski W, Rychlik L, Jędrzejewska B (1993) Responses of bank voles to odours of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68:251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jenkins FA Jr (1974) Tree shrew locomotion and the origins of primate arborealism. In: Jenkins FA Jr (ed) Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York, pp 85–116Google Scholar
  50. Ji Q, Luo Z-X, Yuan C-X, Wible JR, Zhang JP, Georgi JA (2002) The earliest known eutherian mammal. Nature 416:816–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kalos MH, Whitlock PA (2009) Monte Carlo Methods. Wiley-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Karantanis N-E, Youlatos D, Rychlik L (2015) Diagonal gaits in the feathertail glider Acrobates pygmaeus (Acrobatidae, Diprotodontia): insights for the evolution of primate quadrupedalism. J Hum Evol 86:43–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kirk EC, Lemelin P, Hamrick MW, Boyer DM, Bloch JI (2008) Intrinsic hand proportions of euarchontans and other mammals: implications for the locomotor behavior of plesiadapiforms. J Hum Evol 55:278–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kram R, Taylor CR (1990) Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 346:265–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Krattli H (2001) Struktur und Funktion des Extremitäteninteguments bei einheimischen Mäuseartigen (Muridae, Rodentia). PhD Dissertation, University of ZurichGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuroe M, Ohori S, Takatsuki S, Miyashita T (2007) Nest-site selection by the harvest mouse Micromys minutus in seasonally changing environments. Acta Theriol 52:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lammers AR (2007) Locomotor kinetics on sloped arboreal and terrestrial substrates in a small quadrupedal mammal. Zoology 110:93–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lammers AR, Biknevicius AR (2004) The biodynamics of arboreal locomotion: the effects of substrate diameter on locomotor kinetics in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). J Exp Biol 207:4325–4336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lammers AR, Earls KD, Biknevicius AR (2006) Locomotor kinetics and kinematics on inclines and declines in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica. J Exp Biol 209:4154–4166Google Scholar
  60. Lammers AR, Gauntner T (2008) Mechanics of torque generation during quadrupedal arboreal locomotion. J Biomech 41:2388–2395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lammers AR, Zurcher U (2011) Stability during arboreal locomotion. In: Klika V (ed) Theoretical Biomechanics. Available from:
  62. Leach M (1990) Mice of the British Isles. Shire Publications Ltd., AylesburyGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee DV, Stakebake EF, Walter RM, Carrier DR (2004) Effects of mass distribution on the mechanics of level trotting in dogs. J Exp Biol 207:1715–1728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lemelin P, Cartmill M (2010) The effect of substrate size on the locomotion and gait patterns of the kinkajou (Potos flavus). J Exp Zool part a Comp Exp Biol 313A:157–168Google Scholar
  65. Luo Z-X, Yuan C-X, Meng Q-J, Ji Q (2011) A Jurassic eutherian mammal and divergence of marsupials and placentals. Nature 476:442–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McElroy EJ, Hickey KL, Reilly SM (2008) The correlated evolution of biomechanics, gait and foraging mode in lizards. J Exp Biol 211:1029–1040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Meng J, Hu Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Li C (2006) A Mesozoic gliding mammal from northeastern China. Nature 444:889–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Meng Q-J, Ji Q, Zhang Y-G, Liu D, Grossnickle DM, Luo Z-X (2015) An arboreal docodont from the Jurassic and mammaliaform ecological diversification. Science 347:764–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Nordvig K, Reddersen J, Jensen TS (2001) Small mammal exploitation of upper vegetation strata in non-forest, mixed farmland habitats. Mammal Biol -Z Säugetierk 66:129–134Google Scholar
  70. Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s Mammals of the World, 6th edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Google Scholar
  71. Nyakatura JA, Fischer MS, Schmidt M (2008) Gait parameter adjustments of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus, Callitrichidae) to locomotion on inclined arboreal substrates. Am J Phys Anthropol 135:13–26Google Scholar
  72. Nyakatura JA, Heymann EW (2010) Effects of support size and orientation on symmetric gaits in free-ranging tamarins of Amazonian Peru: implications for the functional significance of primate gait sequence patterns. J Hum Evol 58:242–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Özkan B, Yigit N, Colak E (2003) A study on Micromys minitus (Pallas, 1771) (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkish Thrace. Turkish J Zool 27:55–60Google Scholar
  74. Pontzer H (2007) Effective limb length and the scaling of locomotor cost in terrestrial animals. J Exp Biol 210:1752–1761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Preuschoft H (2002) What does “arboreal locomotion” mean exactly and what are the relationships between “climbing,” environment and morphology? Z Morphol Anthropol 83:171–188Google Scholar
  76. Preuschoft H, Witte H, Fischer MS (1995) Locomotion in nocturnal prosimians. In: Alterman L, Doyle G, Izard M (eds) Creatures of the Dark. Plenum Press, New York, pp 453–472Google Scholar
  77. Pridmore PA (1994) Locomotion in Dromiciops australis (Marsupialia, Microbiotheriidae). Aust J Zool 42:679–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rollinson JM, Martin RD (1981) Comparative aspects of primate locomotion, with special reference to arboreal cercopithecines. Symp Zool Soc Lond 48:377–427Google Scholar
  79. Schmidt A, Fischer MS (2010) Arboreal locomotion in rats – the challenge of maintaining stability. J Exp Biol 213:3615–3624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmidt A, Fischer MS (2011) The kinematic consequences of locomotion on sloped arboreal substrates in a generalized (Rattus norvegicus) and a specialized (Sciurus vulgaris) rodent. J Exp Biol 214:2544–2559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmidt M (2005) Hind limb proportions and kinematics: are small primates different from other small mammals? J Exp Biol 208:3367–3383Google Scholar
  82. Schmitt D (2003) Substrate size and primate forelimb mechanics : implications for understanding the evolution of primate locomotion. Internatl J Primatol 24:1023–1036Google Scholar
  83. Schmitt D, Lemelin P (2002) Origins of primate locomotion: gait mechanics of the woolly opossum. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:231–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Shapiro LJ, Young JW (2012) Kinematics of quadrupedal locomotion in sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps): effects of age and substrate size. J Exp Biol 215:4049–4049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shattuck MR, Williams SA (2010) Arboreality has allowed for the evolution of increased longevity in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4635–4639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Soligo C, Martin RD (2006) Adaptive origins of primates revisited. J Hum Evol 50:414–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Soligo C, Smaers JB (2016) Contextualising primate origins - an ecomorphological framework. J Anat 228:608–629CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Stevens NJ (2006) Stability, limb coordination and substrate type: the ecorelevance of gait sequence pattern in primates. J Exp Zool part a comp Exp Biol 305A:953–963Google Scholar
  89. Stevens NJ (2008) The effect of branch diameter on primate gait sequence pattern. Am J Primatol 70:356–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Surmacki A, Gołdyn B, Tryjanowski P (2005) Location and habitat characteristics of the breeding nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in the reed-beds of an intensively used farmland. Mammalia 69:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Urbani B, Youlatos D (2013) Positional behavior and substrate use of Micromys minutus (Rodentia: Muridae): insights for understanding primate origins. J Hum Evol 64:130–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Vázquez-Molinero R, Martin T, Fischer MS, Frey R (2001) Comparative anatomical investigations of the postcranial skeleton of Henkelotherium guimarotae Krebs, 1991 (Eupantotheria, Mammalia) and their implications for its locomotion. Zoosyst Evol 77:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vilensky JA, Moore AM, Libii JN (1994) Squirrel monkey locomotion on an inclined treadmill: implications for the evolution of gaits. J Hum Evol 26:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wallace IJ, Demes B (2008) Symmetrical gaits of Cebus apella: implications for the functional significance of diagonal sequence gait in primates. J Hum Evol 54:783–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. White TD (1990) Gait selection in the brush-tail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), and the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana). J Mammal 71:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Witte H, Preuschoft H, Fischer MS (2002) The importance of the evolutionary heritage of locomotion on flat ground in small mammals for the development of arboreality. Z Morphol Anthropol 83:221–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Ylönen H (1990) Spatial avoidance between the bank vole Clethrionomys minutus and the harvest mouse Micromys minutus: an experimental study. Ann Zool Fennici 27:313–320Google Scholar
  98. Young JW (2009) Substrate determines asymmetrical gait dynamics in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis). Am J Phys Anthropol 138:403–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Zheng X, Bi S, Wang X, Meng J (2013) A new arboreal haramiyid shows the diversity of crown mammals in the Jurassic period. Nature 500:199–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology, School of BiologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Systematic Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland
  3. 3.Département d’Ecologie et de Gestion de la BiodiversitéCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations