Advertisement

Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Masticatory Muscle Anatomy and Feeding Efficiency of the American Beaver, Castor canadensis (Rodentia, Castoridae)

  • Philip G. Cox
  • Hester Baverstock
Original Paper

Abstract

Beavers are well-known for their ability to fell large trees through gnawing. Yet, despite this impressive behavior, little information exists on their masticatory musculature or the biomechanics of their jaw movements. It was hypothesized that beavers would have a highly efficient arrangement of the masticatory apparatus, and that gnawing efficiency would be maintained at large gape. The head of an American beaver, Castor canadensis, was dissected to reveal the masticatory musculature. Muscle origins and insertions were noted, the muscles were weighed and fiber lengths measured. Physiological cross-sectional areas were determined, and along with the muscle vectors, were used to calculate the length of the muscle moment arms, the maximum incisor bite force, and the proportion of the bite force projected along the long axis of the lower incisor, at occlusion and 30° gape. Compared to other sciuromorph rodents, the American beaver was found to have large superficial masseter and temporalis muscles, but a relatively smaller anterior deep masseter. The incisor bite force calculated for the beaver (550–740 N) was much higher than would be predicted from body mass or incisor dimensions. This is not a result of the mechanical advantage of the muscles, which is lower than most other sciuromorphs, but is likely related to the very high percentage (>96 %) of bite force directed along the lower incisor long axis. The morphology of the skull, mandible and jaw-closing muscles enable the beaver to produce a very effective and efficient bite, which has permitted beavers to become highly successful ecosystem engineers.

Keywords

Beaver Dissection Masticatory muscles Bite force Rodent 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Andrew Kitchener of National Museums Scotland for providing the beaver specimen, and Mrs Sue Taft from the Department of Engineering, University of Hull for use of her dermestid beetle colony. Thanks are also due to Gwen Haley and the staff of the X-ray department at The York Hospital for CT scanning the skull and mandible. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Supplementary material

10914_2015_9306_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Online Resource 1 Mathematical details of the calculation of the biomechanical metrics. (DOCX 26 kb)

References

  1. Ball SS, Roth VL (1995) Jaw muscles of New World squirrels. J Morphol 224: 265–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanga-Kanfi S, Miranda H, Penn O, Pupko T, DeBry RW, Huchon D (2009) Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evol Biol 9: 71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt JF (1855) Beiträge zur nähern Kenntniss der Säugethiere Russlands. Mém Acad Imp Sci St Pétersbourg, Sér 6 9: 1–375Google Scholar
  4. Caspari E (2003) Animal Life in Nature, Myth and Dreams. Chiron Publications, Hendersonville, NCGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox PG, Jeffery N (2011) Reviewing the morphology of the jaw-closing musculature in squirrels, rats and guinea pigs with contrast-enhanced microCT. Anat Rec 294: 915–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox PG, Kirkham J, Herrel A (2013) Masticatory biomechanics of the Laotian rock rat, Laonastes aenigmamus, and the function of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle. PeerJ 1: e160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox PG, Rayfield EJ, Fagan MJ, Herrel A, Pataky TC, Jeffery N (2012) Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents. PLoS ONE 7: e36299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Druzinsky RE (2010a) Functional anatomy of incisal biting in Aplodontia rufa and sciuromorph rodents – Part 1: Masticatory muscles, skull shape and digging. Cells Tissues Organs 191: 510–522CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Druzinsky RE (2010b) Functional anatomy of incisal biting in Aplodontia rufa and sciuromorph rodents – Part 2: Sciuromorphy is efficacious for production of force at the incisors. Cells Tissues Organs 192: 50–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Druzinsky RE (2015) The oral apparatus of rodents: variations on the theme of a gnawing machine. In: Cox PG, Hautier L (eds) Evolution of the Rodents: Advances in Phylogeny, Functional Morphology and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 323–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabre P-H, Hautier L, Dimitrov D, Douzery EJP (2012) A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach. BMC Evol Biol 12: 88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman PW, Lemen CA (2008) A simple morphological predictor of bite force in rodents. J Zool 275: 418–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrel A, Spithoven L, Van Damme R, De Vree F (1999) Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct Ecol 13: 289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins SH, Busher PE (1979) Castor canadensis. Mammal Species 120: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston CA, Naiman RJ (1990) Browse selection by beaver: effects on riparian forest composition. Can J Forest Res 20: 1036–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Korth WW (2002) Comments on the systematics and classification of the beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae). J Mammal Evol 8: 279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller-Schwarze D (2011) The Beaver: Its Life and Impact. 2nd Edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy RA, Beardsley AC (1974) Mechanical properties of the cat soleus muscle in situ. Am J Physiol 227: 1008–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Naiman RJ, Melillo JM, Hobbie JE (1986) Ecosystem alteration of boreal forest streams by beaver (Castor canadensis). Ecology 67: 1254–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naiman RJ, Pinay G, Johnston CA, Pastor J (1994) Beaver influences on the long-term biogeochemical characteristics of boreal forest drainage networks. Ecology 75: 905–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak R (1999) Walker’s Mammals of the World. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  22. Offermans M, De Vree F (1989) Morphology of the masticatory apparatus in the springhare, Pedetes capensis. J Mammal 70: 701–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osborn JW (1969) Dentine hardness and incisor wear in the beaver (Castor fiber). Cells Tissues Organs 72: 123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosell F, Boysér O, Collen P, Parker H (2005) Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mammal Rev 35: 248–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rybczynski N (2007) Castorid phylogenetics: implications for the evolution of swimming and tree-exploitation in beavers. J Mammal Evol 14: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rybczynski N (2008) Woodcutting behavior in beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia): estimating ecological performance in a modern and fossil taxon. Paleobiology 34: 389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Simpson GG (1945) The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 85: 1–350Google Scholar
  29. Terwilliger J, Pastor J (1999) Small mammals, ectomycorrhizae, and conifer succession in beaver meadows. Oikos 85: 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thorington RW, Darrow K (1996) Jaw muscles of Old World squirrels. J Morphol 230: 145–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tullberg T (1899) Über das System der Nagethiere: eine phylogenetische Studie. Nova Acta Reg Soc Sci Upsala Ser 3 18: 1–514Google Scholar
  32. Turnbull WD (1970) Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana (Geol) 18: 147–356Google Scholar
  33. van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC (1989) Comparison of jaw-muscle bite-force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution CT scanning. J Dent Res 68: 1765–1770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Waterhouse GR (1839) Observations on the Rodentia with a view to point out groups as indicated by the structure of the crania in this order of mammals. Ann Mag Nat Hist 3: 90–96, 184–188, 274–279, 593–600Google Scholar
  35. Wood AE (1965) Grades and clades among rodents. Evolution 19: 115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Woods CA (1972) Comparative myology of jaw, hyoid, and pectoral appendicular regions of New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 147: 115–198Google Scholar
  37. Woods CA, Hermanson JW (1985) Myology of hystricognath rodents: an analysis of form, function and phylogeny. In: Luckett WP, Hartenberger J-L (eds) Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Plenum Press, New York, pp 685–712Google Scholar
  38. Woods CA, Howland EB (1979) Adaptive radiation of capromyid rodents: anatomy of the masticatory apparatus. J Mammal 60: 95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS (2002) An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia 132: 96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical SchoolUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Hull York Medical SchoolUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations