Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Survey of the Existing Stope Layout Optimization Techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The analysis of algorithms to optimize the geometry of the stope limits in underground mines is performed on the block orebody models, and its results are reported. The scopes of application of the existing methods and algorithms are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Ataee-pour, “A heuristic algorithm to optimise stope boundaries,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, Australia (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Riddle, “A dynamic programming solution of a block-caving mine layout,” in: Proceedings of the 14th International APCOM Symposium, SME, Colorado (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. B. Johnson and W. R. Sharp, “A three-dimensional dynamic programming method for optimal ultimate open pit design,” USBM Report of Investigation, No. 7553 (1971).

  4. J. Deraisme, C. de Fouquent, and H. Fraisse, “Geostatistical orebody model for computer optimization of profits from different underground mining methods,” in: Proceedings of the 18th International APCOM Symposium, The Inst. of Mining and Metallurgy (1984).

  5. J. Deraisme and C. de Fouquent, “Recent and future developments of “downstream” geostatistics,” Geostatistics and National Resource Characterisation, Eds: Verly et al. (1984).

  6. N. M. Cheimanoff, E. P. Deliac, and J. L. Mallet, “GEOCAD: an alternative CAD artificial inteligence tool that helps moving from geological resources to mineable reserves,” in: Proceedings of the 21st International APCOM Symposium, SME, Colorado (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Alford, “Optimization in underground mine design,” in: Proceedings of the 25th International APCOM Symposium, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. M. Davis and J. Morrison, “Enhanced underground design through optimization and risk assessment,” in: Proceedings of the 28th International APCOM Symposium, Ed.: K Dagdelen, Colorado (1999).

  9. J. Ovanic and D. S. Young, “Economic optimization of stope geometry using separable programming with special Branch and Bound techniques,” in: Proceedings of the 3rd Canadian Conference on Computer Applications in the Mineral Industry, Ed.: H S Mitri, Balkema, Rotterdam (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. B. Creegan and F. A. Monforte, “Southern California Gas Company uses special ordered sets to model regulatory guidelines,” Interfaces, 20, No.4 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Ovanic and D. S. Young, “Economic optimization of open stope geometry,” in: Proceedings of the 28th International APCOM Symposium, Ed.: K Dagdelen, Colorado School of Mines, CO (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Ataee-pour, “A new heuristic algorithm to optimise stope boundaries,” in: Proceedings of the 2nd Regional APCOM Symposium, Ed.: L. A. Puchkov, Moscow, Russia (1997).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, No. 5, pp. 62–82, September–October, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ataee-pour, M. A Critical Survey of the Existing Stope Layout Optimization Techniques. J Min Sci 41, 447–466 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-006-0008-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-006-0008-9

Navigation