Skip to main content
Log in

Physician Involvement in Torture: An Ethical Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence proves that physician involvement in torture is widely practiced in society. Despite its status as an illegal act as established by multiple international organizations, mandates are routinely unheeded and feebly enforced. Philosophies condemning and condoning torture are examined as well as physicians’ professional responsibilities and the manner in which such varying allegiances can be persuasive. Physician involvement in torture has proven detrimental to the core values of medicine and has tainted the field’s commitment to individuals’ health and well-being. Only when this complex issue is addressed using a multilevel approach will the moral rehabilitation of medicine begin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, S., Allen Keller, Steven Reisner and Vincent Iacopino. 2009. Aiding Torture: Health Professionals’ Ethics and Human Rights Violations Revealed in the May 2004 CIA Inspector General’s Report, Physicians for Human Rights.

  2. Allhoff, Fritz. 2003. “Terrorism and Torture,” International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 17:105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagaric, Mirko and Julie Clarke. 2005. “Not Enough Official Torture in the World? The Circumstances in Which Torture is Morally Justifiable,” University of San Francisco Law Review, 39:581–616.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Behan, Christopher W. 2007. “Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War by Michael Gross,” The Journal of Legal Medicine, 28:163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benetar, Solomon R. and Ross E.G. Upshur. 2008. “Dual Loyalty of Physicians in the Military and in Civilian Life,” American Journal of Public Health, 98:2161–2167.

  6. Burns-Cox, C.J., David Halpin, C. Stephen Frost and Peter Hall. 2007. “Ethical treatment of military detainees,” The Lancet, 370:1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, J. Wesley, David U. Himmelstein, Karen Lasser, Danny McCormick, David H. Bor, Sarah L. Cutrona and Steffie Woolhandler. 2007. “U.S. Medical Students’ Knowledge About the Military Draft, the Geneva Conventions, and Military Medical Ethics,” International Journal of Health Services, 37:643–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2011. “Former MI5 Head: Torture is ‘wrong and never justified.’

  9. Clark, Peter A. 2006. “Medical Ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: The Problem of Dual Loyalty,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34:570–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, United Nations, 1984.

  11. Declaration of Tokyo- Guidelines for Physicians Concerning Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment, World Medical Association, 1975.

  12. Doctors at risk: A viewpoint from the International Committee of the Red Cross, International Committee of the Red Cross, 1996.

  13. Dual Loyalty & Health and Human Rights in Health Professional Practice; Proposed Guidelines & Institutional Mechanisms, Physicians for Human Rights, 2002.

  14. Dyer, Owen. 2007. “US medical authorities are accused of failing to act over doctors in Guantanamo,” British Medical Journal, 335:530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilligan, Michael J. and Nathaniel H. Nesbitt. 2009. “Do Norms Reduce Torture?” The Journal of Legal Studies, 38.

  16. Grodin, Michael and George Annas. 2007. “Physicians and torture: lessons from the Nazi doctors,” International Review of the Red Cross, 89:635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, Peter. 2004. “Doctors and the war on terrorism,” British Medical Journal, 329:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes, D. and A. Perron. 2007. “Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 33:143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody, International Committee of the Red Cross, 2007.

  20. Istanbul Protocol, United Nations, 1999.

  21. Lewis, Neil. 2005. “Interrogators Cite Doctors’ Aid at Guantanamo Prison Camp,” The New York Times, June 24.

  22. Lifton, Robert Jay. 2004. “Doctors and Torture,” New England Journal of Medicine, 351:415–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maio, Giovanni. 2001. “History of medical involvement in torture—then and now,” The Lancet, 357:1609–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moszynski, Peter. 2008. “Medical evaluation of former detainees,” British Medical Journal, 336:1458–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Connor, Mike. 2009. “Can we prevent doctors being complicit in torture? Breaking the serpent’s egg,” Journal of Law and Medicine, 17:426–438.

    Google Scholar 

  26. O’Reilly, K. 2007. “Future doctors flunk military medical ethics test,” American Medical News.

  27. Polatin, Peter B., Jens Modvig and Therese Rytter. 2010. “Helping to stop doctors becoming complicit in torture,” British Medical Journal, 340.

  28. Powell, Alvin. 2005. “Why good doctors do bad things,Harvard Gazette, March 3.

  29. Principles of Medical Ethics, United Nations, 1982.

  30. Rasmussen, Ole Vedel. 1991. “The involvement of medical doctors in torture: the state of the art,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 17:26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reis, Chen, Ameena T. Ahmed, Lynn L. Amowitz, Adam L. Kushner, Maryam Elahi and Vincent Iacopino. 2004. “Physician Participation in Human Rights Abuses in Southern Iraq,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291:1480–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh, Jerome Amir. 2003. “American physicians and dual loyalty obligations in the ‘war on terror’,” BMC Medical Ethics, 4:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilks, Michael. 2005. “A stain on medical ethics,” The Lancet, 366:429–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omur Cinar Elci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siddiqui, N.A., Civaner, M. & Elci, O.C. Physician Involvement in Torture: An Ethical Perspective. J Med Humanit 34, 59–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-012-9197-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-012-9197-1

Keywords

Navigation