Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A CD8+ T Cell-Related Genes Expression Signature Predicts Prognosis and the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immunotherapy has been applied to patients with breast cancer. However, only part of patients benefits from the current immunotherapy. Accurate prediction of individual response to immunotherapy can be beneficial for breast cancer management. CD8+ T cells are the main force of anti-tumor immunity. This study aimed to establish a CD8+ T cell-related gene expression signature for prediction of breast cancer prognostic and immunotherapy efficacy. RNA-seq transcriptomic data was the basics of this research. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis established the prognostic signature. We identified 290 CD8+ T cell-related genes in the training set and established a risk-score model based on 8-genes panel (SOCS1, IL10, CAMK4, CXCL13, KIR2DS4, TESPA1, CD70 and ICAM4). Subsequently, univariate Cox regression analysis suggested that high risk-score was a risk factor for breast cancer (HR = 3.1, 95%CI 2.0–4.8, P < 0.001). In tumor microenvironment, high-risk tumors present decreased tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells and increased M2 macrophages. The low-risk patients may benefit more from immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy than the high-risk patients. Moreover, breast tumors which sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) showed higher IL10 expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The publicly available gene expression data used in the present study can be accessed from the UCSC Xena website (https://xenabrowser.net) and GEO database website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds).

Abbreviations

TCGA-BRCA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas- breast cancer

ssGSEA:

Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis

WGCNA:

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

OS:

Overall survival

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

ICI:

Immune checkpoints inhibitors

IPS:

Immunophenoscore

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

PD:

Progressive disease

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:439–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, et al. Breast cancer Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reading JL, Gálvez-Cancino F, Swanton C, Lladser A, Peggs KS, Quezada SA. The function and dysfunction of memory CD8(+) T cells in tumor immunity. Immunol Rev. 2018;283:194–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baxevanis CN, Fortis SP, Perez SA. The balance between breast cancer and the immune system: Challenges for prognosis and clinical benefit from immunotherapies. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019.

  7. Ali HR, Provenzano E, Dawson SJ, Blows FM, Liu B, Shah M, et al. Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12,439 patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1536–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Leun AM, Thommen DS, Schumacher TN. CD8(+) T cell states in human cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:218–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chambers CA, Kuhns MS, Egen JG, Allison JP. CTLA-4-mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:565–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359:1350–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Catacchio I, Silvestris N, Scarpi E, Schirosi L, Scattone A, Mangia A. Intratumoral, rather than stromal, CD8+ T cells could be a potential negative prognostic marker in invasive breast cancer patients. Transl Oncol. 2019;12:585–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie P, Ma Y, Yu S, An R, He J, Zhang H. Development of an Immune-Related Prognostic Signature in Breast Cancer. Front Genet. 2019;10:1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kao KJ, Chang KM, Hsu HC, Huang AT. Correlation of microarray-based breast cancer molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes: implications for treatment optimization. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, Wang Y, Lallemand F, Haibe-Kains B, et al. Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3207–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Desmedt C, Di Leo A, de Azambuja E, Larsimont D, Haibe-Kains B, Selleslags J, et al. Multifactorial approach to predicting resistance to anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1578–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:529–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabatier R, Finetti P, Cervera N, Lambaudie E, Esterni B, Mamessier E, et al. A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:407–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatzis C, Pusztai L, Valero V, Booser DJ, Esserman L, Lluch A, et al. A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. JAMA. 2011;305:1873–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R, Dubsky P, Fitzal F, Singer CF, et al. A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6012–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung W, Eum HH, Lee HO, Lee KM, Lee HB, Kim KT, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell profiling in primary breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15081.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollern DP, Xu N, Thennavan A, Glodowski C, Garcia-Recio S, Mott KR, et al. B Cells and T Follicular Helper Cells Mediate Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in High Mutation Burden Mouse Models of Breast Cancer. Cell. 2019;179:1191-206.e21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariathasan S, Turley SJ, Nickles D, Castiglioni A, Yuen K, Wang Y, et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature. 2018;554:544–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshihara K, Shahmoradgoli M, Martínez E, Vegesna R, Kim H, Torres-Garcia W, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12:453–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Charoentong P, Finotello F, Angelova M, Mayer C, Efremova M, Rieder D, et al. Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Cell Rep. 2017;18:248–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Balar AV, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, Powles T, Petrylak DP, Bellmunt J, et al. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ilangumaran S, Bobbala D, Ramanathan S. SOCS1: Regulator of T Cells in Autoimmunity and Cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;410:159–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deng XX, Jiao YN, Hao HF, Xue D, Bai CC, Han SY. Taraxacum mongolicum extract inhibited malignant phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer cells in tumor-associated macrophages microenvironment through suppressing IL-10 / STAT3 / PD-L1 signaling pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;274:113978.

  32. Koga T, Kawakami A. The role of CaMK4 in immune responses. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28:211–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hensel O, Burow P, Mages S, Wienke A, Kraya T, Zierz S. Increased Blood Flow Velocity in Middle Cerebral Artery and Headache Upon Ingestion of Ice Water. Front Neurol. 2019;10:677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ihanus E, Uotila LM, Toivanen A, Varis M, Gahmberg CG. Red-cell ICAM-4 is a ligand for the monocyte/macrophage integrin CD11c/CD18: characterization of the binding sites on ICAM-4. Blood. 2007;109:802–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamarudin AN, Cox T, Kolamunnage-Dona R. Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taube JM, Galon J, Sholl LM, Rodig SJ, Cottrell TR, Giraldo NA, et al. Implications of the tumor immune microenvironment for staging and therapeutics. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:214–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hao D, Liu J, Chen M, Li J, Wang L, Li X, et al. Immunogenomic Analyses of Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer Reveal Immune Score is a Strong Prognostic Factor and an Indicator of Chemosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3560–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sui S, An X, Xu C, Li Z, Hua Y, Huang G, et al. An immune cell infiltration-based immune score model predicts prognosis and chemotherapy effects in breast cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10:11938–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu FF, Liu CJ, Liu LL, Zhang Q, Guo AY. Expression profile of immune checkpoint genes and their roles in predicting immunotherapy response. Brief Bioinform. 2020.

  40. Petroni G, Buqué A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:310–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:253–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Funes SC, Rios M, Escobar-Vera J, Kalergis AM. Implications of macrophage polarization in autoimmunity. Immunology. 2018;154:186–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmid P, Rugo HS, Adams S, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, et al. Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:44–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the contributors of data involved in this study.

Funding

No Funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL and LL designed and conceived the study. TZ downloaded the data from online databases. HL and JL analyzed the data. LL, TZ and JL wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-qi Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for Publication

All authors approved the publication of this manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, Lh., Lu, Jr., Zhao, T. et al. A CD8+ T Cell-Related Genes Expression Signature Predicts Prognosis and the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 27, 53–65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-022-09510-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-022-09510-0

Keywords

Navigation