Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The National Mastitis Council: A Global Organization for Mastitis Control and Milk Quality, 50 Years and Beyond

  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Mastitis Council was founded in 1961 based on the desire of a forward-thinking group of individuals to bring together “all forces of organized agriculture in the United States to combat, through every practical device, the mastitis threat to the Nation’s health and food safety”. What started as a small organization focused on mastitis of dairy cattle in the United States has grown into a global organization for mastitis and milk quality. Over the last 50-plus years the concerted efforts of the membership have led to the synthesis and dissemination of a considerable body of knowledge regarding udder health, milk quality, and food safety which has improved dairy cattle health and well-being and farm productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

AABP:

American Association of Bovine Practitioners

AHI:

Animal Health Institute

AVMA:

American Veterinary Medical Association

BTSCC:

Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

IAMFES:

International Association of Milk, Food, and Environmental Sanitarians

IDF:

International Dairy Federation

IMI:

Intramammary Infection

NCIMS:

National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments

NIRD:

National Institute for Research in Dairying

NMC:

National Mastitis Council

NMPF:

National Milk Producers Federation

NMRF:

National Mastitis Research Foundation

rBST:

Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin

SCC:

Somatic Cell Count

TCI:

Teat Club International

TTS:

Technology Transfer Session

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

References

  1. Halasa T, Hujips K, Osteras O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Vet Q. 2007;29:18–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pol M, Ruegg PL. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. USDA. Dairy 2007, Part III: Reference of dairy cattle health and management practices in the United States, 2007. Fort Collins, Colorado: USDA-APHIS-VS, CEAH. #N482.0908; 136.

  4. Microbiological procedures for use in the diagnosis of bovine udder infection and determination of milk quality. 4th ed. Verona, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2004.

  5. Barnes-Pallesen FD, Blackmer P, Britten A, Bushnell RB, Van Damme DM, Welcome F. Laboratory and field handbook on bovine mastitis. Arlington: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hogan JS, Gonzalez RN, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW, et al. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Madison: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The modern way to efficient milking. Chicago, Illinois: Milking Machine Manufacturers Council of the Farm Equipment Institute; 1964.

  8. Procedures for evaluating vacuum levels and airflow in milking systems. Verona, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2012.

  9. Troubleshooting cleaning problems in milking systems. Madison, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2004.

  10. Mein GA, Neijenhuis F, Morgan WF, Reinemann DJ, Hillerton JE, Baines JR, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Non-infectious factors. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillerton JE, Morgan WF, Farnsworth R, Neijenhuis F, Baines RJ, Mein GA, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 2. Infectious factors and infections. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 352–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reinemann DJ, Rasmussen MD, LeMire S, Neijenhuis F, Mein GA, Hillerton JE, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 3. Getting the numbers right. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 357–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neijenhuis F, Mein GA, Britt JS, Reinemann DJ, Hillerton JE, Farnsworth R, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 4. Relationship between teat-end callosity or hyperkeratosis and mastitis. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 362–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dodd FH, Westgarth DR, Neave FK, Kingwill RG. Mastitis – the strategy of control. J Dairy Sci. 1969;52:689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwell RG, Westgarth DR. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J Dairy Sci. 1969;52:696–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Human Health Risks Associated with High Somatic Cell Count Milk. Madison, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2005. http://nmconline.org/docs/SCChealthrisks.pdf

  17. Hogan JS, Galton DM, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW. Protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat dips. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73:2580–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nickerson SC, Saxon A, Fox LK, Hemling T, Hogan JS, Morelli J, Oliver SP, Owens WE, Pawlak M, Petersson L. Recommended protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat germicides. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. 2004:379–99.

  19. Hogan JS, Eberhart RJ, Galton DM, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW. Protocol for determining efficacy of pre-milking teat dips. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. Reno, Nevada. 1991:157–9

  20. Schukken YH, Rauch BJ, Morelli J. Defining standardized protocols for determining the efficacy of a postmilking teat disinfectant following experimental exposure of teats to mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 2013;99:2694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pankey JW, Eberhart RJ, Cuming AL, Daggett RD, Farnsworth RJ, McDuff CK. Update on post-milking teat antisepsis. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1336–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collier RJ, Bauman DE. Update on human health concerns of recombinant bovine somatotropin use in dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:1800–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Much of the information presented in this manuscript was previously published in a booklet distributed by NMC to its membership in 2012 commemorating 50 years of the National Mastitis Council 1961–2011, and in documents available at http://www.nmconline.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Middleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Middleton, J.R., Saeman, A., Fox, L.K. et al. The National Mastitis Council: A Global Organization for Mastitis Control and Milk Quality, 50 Years and Beyond. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 19, 241–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-014-9328-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-014-9328-6

Keywords