Mammary gland biology has continued to excite and entice researchers due to its relative ease for manipulation as a developmental model system as well as its relevance to lactation biology and to understanding breast tumor biology. As a developmental system, the mammary gland has provided insights into epithelial and secretory differentiation as well as stem/progenitor cell biology. The relevance to breast cancer continues to be the basis for much of the rapidly-expanding mammary tumor literature. Whether one is a neophyte starting breast cancer research or a well-established PI, the questions posed by these researchers include which models will help unmask features of human breast cancer? Which ones faithfully recapitulate aspects of this disease? And, last but not least, which protocol should be used and how will the data be interpreted? Regardless of whether your primary focus is breast cancer, development or lactation, it is clear that advances in methodologies continue to be integral to progress in these fields.
Numerous reviews have previously appeared in this journal detailing methods to approach critical questions in mammary gland development, lactational biology and breast cancer. Notably, an entire issue of the Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia was devoted to this topic in 2009 (Volume 14, Issue 4) to update researchers on in vitro and in vivo methods. That issue was a stunning success. Given the rapid methodological advances in these fields there clearly is a need for an update of the update! This Methods issue addresses new and refined approaches as well as some current controversies in the field. In the developmental arena we have included an article comparing leading methods for isolating and separating populations of mammary epithelial cells [1] as well as articles describing protocols for 3D in vitro models [2] and non-adherent sphere assays [3, 4] to study morphogenesis/differentiation and stem/progenitor populations, respectively, in vitro. We also include a review by Lewis and Medina in which they continue a critical discussion of the controversies surrounding the use of Matrigel for transplantation methodologies [5]. Finally, in a novel addition for this journal we now make available a digital link to the popular mouse mammary methods video first produced in VHS format by Charles Daniel and Gary Silberstein [6].
Regarding tumor biology, we have included articles describing methods that should help address the following outstanding problems: what are the molecular and cellular mechanisms that govern progression from confined breast cancer into invasive carcinoma and to metastases [4, 7, 8]? What drives organ tropism of breast cancer cells during metastasis [9]? What is the influence of estrogen receptor (ER)-ligands and ER-cooperating factors on gene expression in ER-positive breast cancers [10]? And, what are the clinically-valuable protein biomarkers [11]?
We would like to thank all the authors and reviewers for their contributions and hope that the readers will find the described methods useful for their research.
References
Smalley MJ, Kendrick H, Sheridan JM, Regan JL, Prater MD, Lindeman GJ, et al. Isolation of mouse mammary epithelial subpopulations: a comparison of leading methods. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9257-1.
Lo AT, Mori H, Mott J, Bissell MJ. Constructing three-dimensional models to study mammary gland branching morphogenesis and functional differentiation. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9251-7.
Rota LM, Lazzarino DA, Ziegler AN, LeRoith D, Wood TL. Determining Mammosphere-forming potential: application of the limiting dilution analysis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9258-0.
Shaw FL, Harrison H, Spence K, Ablett MP, Simoes BM, Farnie G et al. A detailed mammosphere assay protocol for the quantification of breast stem cell activity. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9255-3.
Lewis MT, Landua JD, Adams 3rd HC, Medina D. A mystery wrapped in an enigma: matrigel enhancement of mammary cell growth and morphogenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9249-1.
Silberstein G, Daniel C. The mouse mammary video: an introduction to the mouse mammary gland and instruction in its surgical manipulation. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012.
Bonapace L, Wyckoff J, Oertner T, Van Rheenen J, Junt T, Bentires-Alj M. If you don’t look, you won’t see: intravital multiphoton imaging of primary and metastatic breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9250-8.
Medina D, Edwards DG, Kittrell F, Lee S, Allred DC. Intra-mammary ductal transplantation: a tool to study premalignant progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9259-z.
Nola S, Sin S, Bonin F, Lidereau R, Driouch K. A methodological approach to unravel Organ-specific breast cancer metastasis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9256-2.
Gilfillan S, Fiorito E, Hurtado A. Functional genomic methods to study estrogen receptor activity. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9254-4.
Liu NQ, Braakman RB, Stingl C, Luider TM, Martens JW, Foekens JA, et al. Proteomics pipeline for biomarker discovery of laser capture microdissected breast cancer tissue. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9252-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentires-Alj, M., Wood, T.L. Introduction. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 17, 89–90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-012-9260-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-012-9260-6