Skip to main content
Log in

Systematically altering the apparent topology of constrained quantum control landscapes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quantum control experiment typically seeks a shaped electromagnetic field to drive a system towards a specified observable objective. The large number of successful experiments can be understood through an exploration of the underlying quantum control landscape, which maps the objective as a function of the control variables. Specifically, under certain assumptions, the control landscape lacks suboptimal traps that could prevent identification of an optimal control. One of these assumptions is that there are no restrictions on the control variables, however, in practice control resources are inevitably constrained. The associated constrained quantum control landscape may be difficult to freely traverse due to the presence of limited resource induced traps. This work develops algorithms to (1) seek optimal controls under restricted resources, (2) explore the nature of apparent suboptimal landscape topology, and (3) favorably alter trap topology through systematic relaxation of the constraints. A set of mathematical tools are introduced to meet these needs by working directly with dynamic controls, rather than the prior studies that employed intermediate so-called kinematic control variables. The new tools are illustrated using few-level systems showing the capability of systematically relaxing constraints to convert an isolated trap into a level set or saddle feature on the landscape, thereby opening up the ability to find new solutions including those of higher fidelity. The results indicate the richness and complexity of the constrained quantum control landscape upon considering the tradeoff between resources and freedom to move on the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, H. Rabitz, Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future. New J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Rabitz, M. Hsieh, C. Rosenthal, Quantum optimally controlled transition landscapes. Science 303, 1998 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Ramakrishna, M. Salapaka, M. Dahleh, H. Rabitz, A. Pierce, Controllability of molecular systems. Phys. Rev. A 51, 960 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Schirmer, H. Fu, A. Solomon, Complete controllability of quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 63, 063410 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Werschnik, E. Gross, Tailoring laser pulses with spectral and fluence constraints using optimal control theory. J. Opt. B 7, S300 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Lapert, R. Tehini, G. Turinici, D. Sugny, Monotonically convergent optimal control theory of quantum systems with spectral constraints on the control field. Phys. Rev. A 79, 063411 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. von den Hoff, S. Thallmair, M. Kowalewski, R. Siemering, R. de Vivie-Riedle, Optimal control theory-closing the gap between theory and experiment. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 14460 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Moore, H. Rabitz, Exploring constrained quantum control landscapes. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 134113 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.-C. Shu, N. Henriksen, Phase-only shaped laser pulses in optimal control theory: application to indirect photofragmentation dynamics in the weak-field limit. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 044303 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Donovan, V. Beltrani, H. Rabitz, Exploring the impact of constraints in quantum optimal control through a kinematic formulation. Chem. Phys. 425, 46 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Donovan, V. Beltrani, H. Rabitz, Local topology at limited resource induced suboptimal traps on the quantum control landscape. J. Math. Chem. 52, 407 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Donovan, H. Rabitz, Investigating constrained quantum control through a kinematic-to-dynamic variable transformation. Phys. Rev. A 90, 013408 (2014)

  13. A. Rothman, T.-S. Ho, H. Rabitz, Exploring the level sets of quantum control landscapes. Phys. Rev. A 73, 053401 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Rabitz, T.-S. Ho, M. Hsieh, R. Kosut, M. Demiralp, Topology of optimally controlled quantum mechanical transition probability landscapes. Phys. Rev. A 74, 012721 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Beltrani, J. Dominy, T.-S. Ho, H. Rabitz, Exploring the top and bottom of the quantum control landscape. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 194106 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Persidis, High-throughput screening. Nat. Biotechnol. 5, 488 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Donovan, V. Beltrani, H. Rabitz, Quantum control by means of hamiltonian structure manipulation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 7348 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Wedge, G. Timco, E. Spielberg, R. George, F. Tuna, S. Rigby, E. McInnes, R. Winpenny, S. Blundell, A. Ardavan, Chemical engineering of molecular qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 107204 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A.D. acknowledges support from the Program in Plasma Science and Technology at Princeton University and the NSF (CHE-1058644), ARO (W911NF-13-1-0237), and ARO-MURI (W911NF-11-1-2068). H.R. acknowledges partial support from DOE (DE-FG02-02ER15344).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Rabitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donovan, A., Rabitz, H. Systematically altering the apparent topology of constrained quantum control landscapes. J Math Chem 53, 718–736 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-014-0453-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-014-0453-7

Keywords

Navigation