Skip to main content
Log in

Torsion in biochemical reaction networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article starts in Part I with a simple example of two biochemical reaction networks that are indistinguishable at the macroscopic level but are different at the molecular level and are shown to have significantly different kinetic properties. So, if one completely ignores the fact that reactions advance in discrete steps at the molecular level, then one can fail to distinguish between networks with widely different kinetics. In part II biochemical reaction networks are treated in a general way to discover what property of a network, only seen at the molecular level, affects its kinetics. It is shown that every such network has a unique torsion group which can be described numerically and readily determined by a programmable computation. If the group is found to be the singleton {0} (as is most often the case in practice), then the network is said to be torsion-free and its kinetic properties unaffected by ignoring its discrete character. A chemical reaction network has to be represented algebraically to calculate its torsion group. If the network is to be understood only at the macroscopic level, it can be placed in the context of real vector spaces, but to recognize its discrete character and its torsion group, each vector space is replaced by a discrete subset of that space, where each molecule can be recognized as a distinct and indivisible entity. Next, the process of calculating a torsion group is shown in several cases, including the example in part I. In this particular case it is shown to have the torsion group with 2 elements, reflecting the fact that the substrate molecules become product molecules 2 at a time, with the result that the overall macroscopic reaction is R ⇔ T, whereas at the molecular level it is 2R ⇔ 2T. In general, however, the torsion group of a biochemical reaction network can be any finite additive group, which is a property of the network that can only be seen at the molecular level. Finally, this fact is demonstrated by showing how to construct a hypothetical, but plausible, biochemical reaction network that has any given finite additive group as its torsion group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pontryagin L.S.: Foundations of Combinatorial Topology. Graylock Press, Rochester, New York (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sellers P.H.: Combinatorial Complexes, a Mathematical Theory of Algorithms. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht: Holland (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newman M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2), 240 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Lederman, Introduction to the Theory of Finite Groups, (fourth edition Chapter 6 Interscience Publishers, New York, 1961)

  5. Angeli D., Sontag E.O.: Monotone chemical reaction networks. J. Math. Chem. 41(3), 295 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P.H. Sellers, Chemical reaction networks, treatise in preparation on the applications of homology in chemistry (2007)

  7. Sellers P.H.: Mathematical tools for a reaction database in biology. Graph Theory Notes of New York XXXV, 22–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milner P.C.: The possible mechanisms of complex reactions involving consecutive steps. J. Electrochem. Soc. 3, 228–232 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Happel J., Sellers P.H.: Analysis of the possible mechanisms for a catalytic reaction system. Adv. Catal. 32(4), 273–323 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sellers P.H.: Combinatorial classification of chemical mechanisms. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 44(4), 784–792 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Wagg, P.H. Sellers, Enumeration of flux routes through complex chemical reactions. Biocomputing: Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium, ed. by R.B. Altman, A. Keith Dunker, L. Hunter, T.E. Klein, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (1997)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter H. Sellers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sellers, P.H. Torsion in biochemical reaction networks. J Math Chem 47, 1287–1302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-009-9654-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-009-9654-x

Keywords

Navigation