Skip to main content
Log in

On Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

The Einstein–Podolsy–Rosen (EPR) paradox is analyzed. Here is shown that, when EPR wavefunctions are submitted to reasonable normalization and the reference frames rotated by unitary transformations, the EPR paradox disapears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935). Phys. Rev 47:777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohm D. (1952). Phys. Rev 85:166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm D. (1952). Phys. Rev 85:180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm D., Aharonov Y. (1957). Phys. Rev 108:1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi Y.H., Sergienko A.V., Rubin M.H. (1993). Phys. Rev. A 47:1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Treacy P.B. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67:014101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell J.S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bohm D. (1989). Quantum Theory. Dover Publications Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbó-Dorca, R. On Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox. J Math Chem 41, 209–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-006-9054-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-006-9054-4

Keywords

Navigation