Abstract
The resonance \(^{63,65}\)Cu NMR spectra in the internal magnetic field in cubanite CuFe\(_{2}\)S\(_{3}\) and chalcopyrite CuFeS\(_{2}\) were studied experimentally at 77 K. Using a cluster approach, ab initio evaluation of the electric field gradient (EFG) at the nuclei of copper in both compounds was performed. The calculations were carried out by the self-consistent restricted method of Hartree–Fock with open shells (SCF-LCAO-ROHF). The largest clusters for which calculations were made had a formula of Cu\(_{7}\)Fe\(_{14}\)S\(_{29}^\mathrm{n}\) for cubanite and Cu\(_{9}\)Fe\(_{10}\)S\(_{28}^\mathrm{n}\) for chalcopyrite, where n is the cluster charge. The best-fit values of the quadrupole parameters (quadrupole frequency \(\nu _\mathrm{Q}\) and the asymmetry parameter of the EFG tensor \(\eta \))—determined experimentally (\(\nu _\mathrm{Q} \approx \) 7.30 MHz and \(\eta \approx \) 0.82) and by calculation (\(\nu _\mathrm{Q} \approx \) 7.38 MHz and \(\eta \approx \) 0.87)—were obtained for a cluster Cu\(_{7}\)Fe\(_{14}\)S\(_{29}^{10}\) for cubanite. Similarly, the best-fit values of the quadrupole parameters—determined experimentally (\(\nu _\mathrm{Q} \approx \) 1.29 MHz and \(\eta \approx \) 0.34) and by calculation (\(\nu _\mathrm{Q} \approx \) 1.40 MHz and \(\eta \approx \) 0.50)—were obtained for a cluster Cu\(_{9}\)Fe\(_{10}\)S\(_{28}^{-4}\) for chalcopyrite. For these clusters, maps of the electron density distribution in the neighborhood of quadrupole nucleus of copper were built. Based on the analysis of the resulting electron density distribution, it is supposed that the bond in these compounds is not quite covalent. Evaluations of the hyperfine interaction constants were made and maps of the spin density distribution in the neighborhood of quadrupole nucleus of copper were built. The energy level diagram calculated in the high-spin ROHF approximation defined chalcopyrite as a compound with a very narrow LUMO–HOMO gap rather well and is consistent with the notion of this compound as a semiconductor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.J. Buerger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 67, 2056 (1945)
M.J. Buerger, Am. Mineral. 32, 415–425 (1947)
L.V. Azaroff, M.J. Buerger, Am. Mineral. 40, 213–225 (1955)
C.L. Burdick, J.H. Ellis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 39, 2518–2525 (1917)
L. Pauling, L.O. Brockway, Z. Kristallogr. 82, 188–193 (1932)
R.S. Abdullin, V.P. Kalchev, I.N. Penkov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela. 22, 2862–2864 (1980)
A.I. Pogoreltsev, V.L. Matukhin, S.P. Nevzorov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Probl. Energ. 17, 178–182 (2004)
A.I. Pogoreltsev, V.L. Matukhin, A.N. Safonov, I.K. Khabibullin, Collection of Papers of the XIIth All-Russian Conference Structure and Dynamics of Molecular Systems (Part 2). Rev. XII. (Yalchik, 2005), pp. 129–133
A.A. Granovsky, Firefly version 7.1.G., http://classic.chem.msu.su/gran/firefly/index.html. Accessed 29 June 2015
R.F.W. Bader, Atoms in Molecules - A Quantum Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990)
Todd A. Keith, AIMAll, Version 11.12.19 (TK Gristmill Software. Overland Park, KS, USA, 2011), http://aim.tkgristmill.com. Accessed 20 June 2013
V.G. Tsirelson, Chemical Bond and Intermolecular Interactions (Mendeleev University Publ, Moscow, 2004), pp. 28–34
F. Neese, ORCA–an Ab Initio, Density Functional and Semiempirical Program Package, version 2.6 (University of Bonn, Bonn, 2008)
A.I. Pogoreltsev, A.N. Gavrilenko, V.L. Matukhin, B.V. Korzun, E.V. Schmidt, J. Appl. Spectrosc. 80, 361–367 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gavrilenko, A.N., Pogoreltsev, A.I., Matukhin, V.L. et al. Low-Temperature Studies of CuFe\(_{2}\)S\(_{3}\) and CuFeS\(_{2}\) by \(^{63,65}\)Cu NMR in the Internal Magnetic Field. J Low Temp Phys 185, 618–626 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-016-1550-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-016-1550-8