Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 373–384 | Cite as

The Behavior of Acromyrmex crassispinus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Trail Bifurcations and the Influence of Ant Flow on Error Rates of Nestbound Laden Workers

  • Mariane A. Nickele
  • Marcio R. PieEmail author
  • Mauricio O. Moura


Ants are ordinarily faced with a succession of bifurcations along their foraging networks. Given that there is no directionality in pheromone trails, each bifurcation is potentially an opportunity for error in the trajectory of laden workers to the nest, which could entail considerable inefficiencies in the transportation of food to the colony. Leaf-cutting ants (Atta and Acromyrmex) commonly show intense traffic and complex foraging trail systems, which make them ideal organisms to study worker behavior in trail bifurcations. The behavior of leaf-cutting ants of the genus Acromyrmex in trail bifurcations is still largely unexplored. Thus, this study aimed to assess the behavior of Acromyrmex crassispinus workers on trail bifurcations and to investigate whether differences in ant flow on foraging trails influence the error rate of nestbound laden workers at trail bifurcation. There was a negative relationship between ant flow and error rate of nestbound laden workers. Most workers walked in the central part of the foraging trails but occupied a broader area of the foraging trail when the ant flow was high. The results of this study provide valuable insight into the organization of traffic flow in A. crassispinus and its impacts on the foraging strategy of the species.


Attini collective decision making error rates leaf-cutting ants traffic flow 



We thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for granting fellowship to MAN and Battistella Florestal for financial support. MRP and MOM was supported by a research grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (301636/2016-8 and 309154/2014-6).

Supplementary material

10905_2018_9684_Fig3_ESM.gif (967 kb)

(GIF 967 kb)

10905_2018_9684_MOESM1_ESM.tif (2 mb)
High resolution image (TIF 2074 kb)
10905_2018_9684_MOESM2_ESM.csv (3 kb)
ESM 2 (CSV 3 kb)
10905_2018_9684_MOESM3_ESM.csv (83 kb)
ESM 3 (CSV 83 kb)


  1. Acosta FJ, Lopes F, Serrano JN (1993) Branching angles of ant trunk trails as an optimization cue. J Theor Biol 160:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron S, Beckers R, Deneubourg JL (1993) Memory and chemical communication in the orientation of two mass-recruiting ant species. Insect Soc 380:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoń K (2018) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.40.4.
  4. Bollazzi M, Roces F (2011) Information needs at the beginning of foraging: grass-cutting ants trade off load size for a faster return to the nest. PLoS One 6:e17667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Burd M (1996) Foraging performance by Atta colombica, a leaf-cutting ant. Am Nat 148:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burd M (2000) Body size effects on locomotion and load carriage in the highly polymorphic leaf-cutting ants Atta colombica and Atta cephalotes. Behav Ecol 11:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burd M (2001) Leaf tissue transport as a function of loading ratio in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Ecol Entomol 26:551–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burd M, Howard JJ (2005) Central-place foraging continues beyond the nest entrance: the underground performance of leaf-cutting ants. Anim Behav 70:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burd M, Archer D, Aranwela N, Stradling D (2002) Traffic dynamics of the leaf-cutting ant, Atta cephalotes. Am Nat 159:283–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cibils-Martina L, Elizalde L, Farji-Brener AG (2017) Traffic rules around the corner: walking of leaf-cutting ants at branching points in trunk trails. Insect Soc 64:549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Couzin ID (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn Sci 13:36–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Czaczkes TJ, Franz S, Witte V, Heinze J (2015) Perception of collective path use affects path selection in ants. Anim Behav 99:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:187–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dussutour A (2004) Organisation spatio-temporelle des Déplacements collectives chez les Fourmis. Thèse de doctorat. Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  16. Dussutour A, Beshers S, Deneubourg JL, Fourcassié V (2009) Priority rules govern the organization of traffic on foraging trails under crowding conditions in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. J Exp Biol 212:499–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elizalde L, Farji-Brener A (2012) To be or not to be faithful: flexible fidelity to foraging trails in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis. Ecol Entomol 37:370–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farji-Brener AG, Chinchilla FA, Cuervo SAMS, Triana E, Quiroga V, Giraldo P (2011) The ‘truck-driver’ effect in leaf-cutting ants: how individual load influences the walking speed of nest-mates. Physiol Entomol 36:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farji-Brener AG, Morueta-Holme N, Chinchilla F, Willink B, Ocampo N, Bruner G (2012) Leaf-cutting ants as road engineers: the width of trails at branching points in Atta cephalotes. Insect Soc 59:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farji-Brener AG, Chinchilla F, Umaña MN, Ocasio-Torres MEO, Chauta-Mellizo A, Acosta-Rojas D, Marinaro S, Curth MT, Amador-Vargas S (2014) Branching angles reflect a tradeoff between reducing trail maintenance costs or travel distances in leaf-cutting ants. Ecology 96:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forster A, Czaczkes TJ, Warner E, Woodall T, Martin M, Ratnieks FLW (2014) Effect of trail bifurcation asymmetry and pheromone presence or absence on trail choice by Lasius niger ants. Ethology 120:768–775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowler H (1979) Environmental correlates of the foraging of Acromyrmex crassispinus. Cienc Cult 31:879–882Google Scholar
  23. Fowler HG, Stiles EW (1980) Conservative resource management by leaf-cutting ants? The role of foraging territories and trails, and environmental patchiness. Sociobiology 5:25–41Google Scholar
  24. Gerbier G, Garnier S, Rieu C, Theraulaz G, Fourcassié V (2008) Are ants sensitive to the geometry of tunnel bifurcation? Anim Cogn 11:637–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon DM (2012) The Dynamics of Foraging Trails in the Tropical Arboreal Ant Cephalotes goniodontus. PLoS One 7:e50472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Grüter C, Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FLW (2010) Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison JF, Fewell JH, Stiller TM, Breed MD (1989) Effects of experience on use of orientations cues in the giant tropical ant. Anim Behav 37:869–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartig F (2016) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level /mixed) regression models. R package version 0.1.3.
  29. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2011) The leafcutter ants: civilization by instinct. W.W. Norton & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard JJ (2001) Costs of trail construction and maintenance in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howard JJ, Henneman ML, Cronin G, Fox JA, Hormiga G (1996) Conditioning of scouts and recruits during foraging by a leafcutting ant, Atta colombica. Anim Behav 52:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature 432:907–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kost C, Gama de Oliveira G, Knoch T, Wirth R (2005) Spatio-temporal permanence and plasticity of foraging trails in young and mature leaf-cutting ant colonies (Atta spp.). J Trop Ecol 21:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lenth RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package ismeans. J Stat Softw 69:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lighton JRB, Bartholomew GA, Feener DHJ (1987) Energetics of locomotion and load carriage and a model of the energy cost of foraging in the leafcutting ant Atta colombica Guer. Physiol Zool 60:524–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maack R (1981) Geografia física do Paraná. José Olympio, CuritibaGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan ED, Keegans SJ, Tits J, Wenseleers T, Billen J (2006) Preferences and differences in the trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens sexdens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Eur J Entomol 103:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1993) Fire ant thermal preferences: behavioral control of growth and metabolism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  41. Riveros AJ, Srygley RB (2008) Do leafcutter ants, Atta colombica, orient their path-integrated home vector with a magnetic compass? Anim Behav 75:1273–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rockwood LL, Hubbell SP (1987) Host plant selection, diet, diversity, and optimal foraging in a tropical leaf-cutting ant. Oecologia 74:55–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Röschard J, Roces F (2002) The effect of load length, width and mass on transport rate in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Oecologia 131:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosengren R, Fortelius W (1986) Ortstreue in foraging ants of the Formica rufa group – Hierarchy of orienting cues and long-term memory. Insect Soc 33:306–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rudolph SG, Loudon C (1986) Load-size selection by foraging leaf-cutter ants (Atta cephalotes). Ecol Entomol 11:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shutler D, Mullie A (1991) Size-related foraging behaviour of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Can J Zool 69:1530–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silva P, Bieber A, Knoch TA, Tabarelli M, Leal IR, Wirth R (2013) Foraging in highly dynamic environments: leaf-cutting ants adjust foraging trail networks to pioneer plant availability. Entomol Exp Appl 147:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Symonds MRE, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tizón R, Wulff JP, Peláez DV (2014) The effect of increase in the temperature on the foraging of Acromyrmex lobicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zool Stud 53:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vilela E, Jaffé K, House PE (1987) Orientation in leaf-cutting ants (Formicidae: Attini). Anim Behav 35:1443–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vittori K, Talbot G, Gautrais J, Fourcassie V, Araujo AFR, Theraulaz G (2006) Path efficiency of ant foraging trails in an artificial network. J Theor Biol 239:507–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward AJW, Herbert-Read JE, Sumpter DJT, Krause J (2011) Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:2312–2315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber NA (1972) Gardening-ants: the attines. American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  54. Wetterer JK, Shafir S, Morrison L, Lips K, Gilbert G, Cipollini M, Blaney C (1992) On- and off-trail orientation in the leaf-cutting ant, Atta cephalotes. J Kansas Entomol Soc 65:96–98Google Scholar
  55. Wirth R, Herz H, Ryel RJ, Beyschlag W, Hölldobler B (2003) Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants: a case study on Atta colombica in the tropical rainforest of Panama. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariane A. Nickele
    • 1
  • Marcio R. Pie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mauricio O. Moura
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations