Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 83–90 | Cite as

Behavioral Activity of Hydrocarbons Emitted by Honeybee Waggle Dancers

  • David C. GilleyEmail author
  • Nicole Miller
  • Trevor J. Courtright
  • Corinna Thom


Waggle-dancing honeybee foragers emit four hydrocarbons that have been shown to stimulate colony foraging by reactivating experienced foragers and increasing the number of recruitment dances. These hydrocarbons, the alkanes tricosane and pentacosane, and the alkenes (Z)-9-tricosene and (Z)-9-pentacosene, are part of the array of social insects cuticular lipids which have been well studied in the context of nestmate recognition. This study seeks to determine which of the dance hydrocarbons produce the behavioral responses of forager bees by using a binary choice behavioral assay for attraction or repulsion to the volatile phase of the dance compounds. We found no significant deviation from random choice for single dance compounds and pairs of compounds, but bees were significantly attracted to a mixture of the three compounds (Z)-9-tricosene, tricosane, and pentacosane. These results suggest synergy among the waggle-dance hydrocarbons, which was unexpected based on previous research where, in the context of nestmate recognition, alkenes have been shown to play a key role in eliciting behavioral responses. Synergy among the waggle-dance hydrocarbons may provide specificity that facilitates adaptive, context-specific behavioral responses to this subset of cuticular hydrocarbons.


Honeybee waggle dance cuticular hydrocarbon semiochemical foraging recruitment context-specific response 



We would like to thank Erin Crehan, Adalyne Arafet, and Virginia Rock for their indispensable help collecting data for this study. NM and TC were supported by the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation in the Sciences and the William Paterson University Student Research and Creative Expression Program. DG was supported by the William Paterson University Assigned Release Time Program.


  1. Breed MD (1998) Recognition pheromones of the honeybee. Bioscience 48(6):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breed MD, Cook CN, McCreery HF, Rodriguez M (2015) Nestmate recognition in eusocial insects: the honeybee as a model system. In: Aquiloni L, Tricarico E (eds) Social Recognition in Invertebrates. Springer, Cham, pp 147–164Google Scholar
  3. Châline N, Sandoz JC, Martin SJ, Ratnieks FL, Jones GR (2005) Learning and discrimination of individual cuticular hydrocarbons by honeybees (Apis mellifera). Chem Senses 30(4):327–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dani FR (2006) Cuticular lipids as semiochemicals in paper wasps and other social insects. Annales Zoologici Fennici 43:500–514Google Scholar
  5. Dani FR, Jones GR, Destri S, Spencer SH, Turillazzi S (2001) Deciphering the recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps. Anim Behav 62(1):165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dani FR, Jones GR, Corsi S, Beard R, Pradella D, Turillazzi S (2005) Nestmate recognition cues in the honeybee: differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes. Chem Senses 30(6):477–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Getz WM, Smith KB (1987) Olfactory sensitivity and discrimination of mixtures in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A 160(2):239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbs AG (1998) Water-proofing properties of cuticular lipids. Am Zool 38(3):471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilley DC (2014) Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honeybees increase forager recruitment by stimulating dancing. PLoS One 9(8):e105671CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilley DC, Kuzora JM, Thom C (2012) Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honeybees stimulate colony foraging activity by causing experienced foragers to exploit known food sources. Apidologie 43(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2007) Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linephithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli. J Exp Biol 210(5):897–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (2005) Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol 50:371–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kather R, Drijfhout FP, Martin SJ (2011) Task group differences in cuticular lipids in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Chem Ecol 37(2):205–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Conte Y, Hefetz A (2008) Primer pheromones in social hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 53:523–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin SJ, Drijfhout FP (2009) Nestmate and task cues are influenced and encoded differently within ant cuticular hydrocarbon profiles. J Chem Ecol 35(3):368–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1995) Statistical tables. Freeman & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Thom C, Gilley DC, Hooper J, Esch HE (2007) The scent of the waggle dance. PLoS Biol 5(9):e228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. van Wilgenburg E, Felden A, Choe DH, Sulc R, Luo J, Shea KJ, Elgar MA, Tsutsui ND (2011) Learning and discrimination of cuticular hydrocarbons in a social insect. Biol Lett.
  20. Wagner D, Tissot M, Gordon D (2001) Task-related environment alters the cuticular hydrocarbon composition of harvester ants. J Chem Ecol 27(9):1805–1819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wyatt TD (2014) Pheromones and animal behavior: chemical signals and signatures. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Gilley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicole Miller
    • 1
  • Trevor J. Courtright
    • 1
  • Corinna Thom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWilliam Paterson University of New JerseyWayneUSA

Personalised recommendations