Skip to main content
Log in

Foundress Fig Wasps are More Likely to Re-emerge From Older Figs

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mutualistic interaction between Ficus spp. and their pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae) centres on the plants’ unique inflorescences—their figs. Each Ficus species is pollinated by foundresses of host-specific fig wasps which enter figs to lay eggs in the female flowers. Most foundresses are trapped in the first figs they enter, but in some species wingless foundresses can re-emerge and subsequently enter and oviposit into further figs. We investigated whether number of potential oviposition sites, age of the fig and age of the wasp influence the likelihood of re-emergence of lone foundresses of the Asian fig wasp Kradibia (=Liporrhopalum) tentacularis from previously un-entered figs of Ficus montana. Likelihood of re-emergence was not influenced by wasp age or flower numbers (resource abundance), but was more frequent from older figs that had waited longer to be pollinated. Laying eggs in several figs offers clear advantages, but foundresses often failed to re-emerge despite being unable to lay all their eggs. Resource quality not quantity appears to be the main influence on the fig wasp’s oviposition decisions. The physical difficulty that the wasps experience when trying to re-emerge may prevent it, even when re-emergence would be advantageous for both the insect and its host plant, but older fig wasps were not detectably ‘weaker’ than younger individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Dunn DW, Jansen-González S, Cook JM, Yu DW, Pereira RAS (2011) Measuring the discrepancy between fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in a pollinating fig wasp. Entomol Exp Appl 140:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana S, Suleman N, Compton SG (2012) Factors influencing realized sex ratios in fig wasps: double oviposition and larval mortalities. J Insect Behav 25:254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibernau M, Hossaert-McKey M, Anstett MC, Kjellberg F (1996) Consequences of protecting flowers in a fig: a one-way trip for pollinators? J Biogeogr 23:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JC, Compton SG, Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM (2002) Quantitative tests of sex ratio models in a pollinating fig wasp. Anim Behav 64:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JC, Dunn A, Compton SG, Hatcher MJ (2003) Foundress re-emergence and fig permeability in fig tree-wasp mutualism. J Evol Biol 16:1186–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N (2007) Population biology of a fig plant-pollinator and parasitoid system under laboratory conditions. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Leeds, UK

  • Suleman N, Raja S, Zhang Y, Compton SG (2011a) Sexual differences in the attractiveness of figs to pollinators: females stay attractive for longer. Ecol Entomol 36:417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N, Raja S, Compton SG (2011b) A comparison of growth and reproduction, under laboratory conditions, of males and females of a dioecious fig tree. Plant Syst Evol 296:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N, Quinell RJ, Compton SG (2013a) Variation in inflorescence size in a dioecious fig tree and its consequences for the plant and its pollinator fig wasp. Plant Syst Evol 299:927–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N, Raja S, Compton SG (2013b) Parasitism of a pollinator fig wasp: mortalities are higher in figs with more pollinators, but are not related to local densities of figs. Ecol Entomol 38:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N, Raja S, Compton SG (2013c) Putting your eggs in several baskets: oviposition in a wasp that walks between several figs. Entomol Exp Appl 149:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman N, Quinnell RJ, Compton SG (2014) Floral ratios in the figs of Ficus montana span the range from actively to passively pollinated fig trees. Acta Oecol 57:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1986) Family planning in parasitoids: adaptive patterns of progeny and sex allocation. In: Waage JK, Greathead DJ (eds) Insect parasitoids. Academic, London, pp 63–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang D, Peng Y, Compton SG (2012) Costs of inflorescence longevity for an Asian fig tree and its pollinator. Evol Ecol 26:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazia Suleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raja, S., Suleman, N. & Compton, S.G. Foundress Fig Wasps are More Likely to Re-emerge From Older Figs. J Insect Behav 27, 786–790 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9469-x

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9469-x

Keywords