Abstract
Male field crickets acoustically signal to attract females by raising their forewings and rubbing them together to produce “regular” (lemon-shaped) pulse sound waveforms. In contrast, we have observed that spring field crickets, Gryllus veletis, often produce an irregularly shaped pulse that exhibits a complete drop in amplitude near the center of the pulse, termed “gap pulses.” We tracked the occurrence of regular and gap pulses temporally. Males change how they signal through time, producing increasingly more gap pulses later in the night and in the morning than through the afternoon and evening. Wing wear did not explain variation in gap pulse production. However, variation in gap pulse production is attributable to variation in body size, with larger males that signal with longer chirps and at lower carrier frequencies producing relatively more gap pulses than smaller males. We hypothesize possible proximate and ultimate causes for the production of gap pulses.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentsen CL, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks RC (2006) Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat 167:E102–E116
Bertram SM, Harrison SH, Thomson IR, Fitzsimmons LP (2013) Adaptive plasticity in wild field cricket’s acoustic signaling. PLoS ONE In press
Brooks RC, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussière LF, Jennions MD (2005) Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution 59:871–880
Cade WH (1979) The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Blum M (ed) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic, New York
Cade WH, Cade ESE (1992) Male mating success, calling and searching behaviour at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim Behav 43:49–56
Crnokrak P, DA Roff DA (1995) Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim Behav 50:1475–1481
Elliott CJH, Koch UT, Elliot JH (1983) Sensory feedback stabilizing reliable stridulation in the field cricket Glyllus campestris L. Anim Behav 31:887–901
Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971
French B, Cade WH (1987) The timing of calling, movement, and mating in the field crickets Gryllus veletis, G. pennsylvanicus, and G. integer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:157–162
Hartley J, Stephen R (1989) Temporal changes in the quality of the song of a bush cricket. J Exp Biol 202:189–202
Hedrick AV (1986) Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:73–77
Holzer B, Jacot A, Brinkhof MWG (2003) Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav Ecol 14:353–359
Hunt J, Brooks RC, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussière LF (2004) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024–1027
Jang Y, Gerhardt HC (2006) Divergence in female calling song discrimination between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:150–158
Koch UT, Elliott CJH, Shaffner KH, Kleindienst HU (1988) The mechanics of stridulation of the cricket Gryllus campestris. J Comp Physiol A 162:213–223
Leonard AS, Hedrick AV (2010) Long-distance signals influence assessment of close range mating displays in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Biol J Linn Soc 100:856–865
Martin SD, Gray DA, Cade WH (2000) Fine-scale temperature effects on cricket calling song. Can J Zool 78:706–712
Prestwich KN, O’Sullivan K (2005) Simultaneous measurement of metabolic and acoustic power and the efficiency of sound production in two mole cricket species (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). J Exp Biol 208:1495–1512
Prestwich KN, Walker TJ (1981) Energetics of singing in crickets: effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol B 143:199–212
Schneider E, Hennig RM (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198:181–191
Shaw KL, Herlihy DP (2000) Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc R Soc B 267:577–584
Wagner WE (1996) Convergent song preferences between female field crickets and acoustically orienting parasitoid flies. Behav Ecol 7:279–285
Walker TJ (1962) Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of crickets. Evolution 16:407–428
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Robert Watkins for his help carrying out this project and Sarah Harrison and Lauren Fitzsimmons for collecting the crickets. We would like to thank Jianqun Wang for his help with the SEM images and Jeff Dawson for discussions and technical expertise early in the development of this research. Funding was provided to SMB by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Research Fund, and a startup grant from Carleton University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomson, I.R., Bertram, S.M. Spring Field Crickets (Gryllus veletis) Use Two Different Pulse Types When Signaling to Attract Mates. J Insect Behav 27, 217–227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-013-9421-5
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-013-9421-5


