Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 264–273 | Cite as

Visual Active Space of the Milfoil Weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Article

Abstract

Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a native weevil, is used as a biological control agent for the invasive aquatic macrophyte, Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.). Because E. lecontei overwinters on land in the adult stage and must find plants in lakes each spring, plant finding behaviors are essential to eventually understanding and predicting long term biological control. Our research showed that E. lecontei is visually attracted to M. spicatum at up to 17.5 cm, and is more attracted to plants than other visual stimuli within 15 cm. We also showed that turbidity may affect visual plant finding at 15 cm. Using available data from this and other previous studies involving chemical cues and other life history traits, we propose a testable conceptual model for how E. lecontei finds plants each year, especially while underwater. This model may also be used to explain plant finding by aquatic phytophagous insects in general.

Keywords

Biological control aquatic host location vision behavior insect 

References

  1. Bell WJ (1990) Searching behavior patterns in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 35:444–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Boylen CW, Eichler LW, Madsen JD (1999) Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuda JP, Charudattan R, Grodowitz MJ, Newman RM, Shearer JF, Tamayo ML, Villegas B (2008) Recent advances in biological control of submersed aquatic weeds. J Aquat Plant Manage 46:15–32Google Scholar
  5. Grace JB, Wetzel RG (1978) The production biology of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review. J Aquat Plant Manage 16:1–11Google Scholar
  6. Harms NE, Grodowitz MJ (2009) Insect herbivores of aquatic and wetland plants in the United States: a checklist from the literature. J Aquat Plant Manage 47:73–96Google Scholar
  7. Marko MD, Newman RM, Gleason FK (2005) Chemically mediated host-plant selection by the milfoil weevil: a freshwater insect-plant interaction. J Chem Ecol 31:2857–2876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McFadyen REC (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annu Rev Entomol 43:369–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Newman RM (2004) Biological control of Eurasian watermilfoil by aquatic insects: basic insights from an applied problem. Arch Hydrobiol 159:145–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newman RM, Borman ME, Castro SW (1997) Developmental performance of the weevil Euhrychiopsis lecontei on native and exotic watermilfoil host plants. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newman RM, Ragsdale DW, Milles A, Oien C (2001) Overwinter habitat and the relationship of overwinter to in-lake densities of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, a Eurasian watermilfoil biological control agent. J Aquat Plant Manage 39:63–67Google Scholar
  12. Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:337–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reeves JL, Lorch PD (2009) Visual plant differentiation by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Insect Behav 22:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reeves JL, Lorch PD, Kershner MW, Hilovsky MA (2008) Biological control of Eurasian watermilfoil by Euhrychiopsis lecontei: assessing efficacy and timing of sampling. J Aquat Plant Manage 46:144–149Google Scholar
  15. Reeves JL, Lorch PD, Kershner MW (2009) Vision is important for plant location by the phytophagous aquatic specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Insect Behav 22:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roley S, Newman RM (2006) Developmental performance of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on northern watermilfoil, Eurasian watermilfoil, and hybrid (northern X Eurasian) watermilfoil. Environ Entomol 35:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheldon SP, Creed RP Jr (1995) Use of a native insect as a biological control for an introduced weed. Ecol Appl 5:1122–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheldon SP, Creed RP Jr (2003) The effect of a native biological control agent for Eurasian watermilfoil on six North American watermilfoils. Aquat Bot 76:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith GS, Barko JW (1990) Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J Aquat Plant Manage 28:55–64Google Scholar
  21. Solarz SL, Newman RM (1996) Oviposition specificity and behavior of the watermilfoil specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei. Oecologia 106:337–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Solarz SL, Newman RM (2001) Variation in hostplant preference and performance by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz, exposed to native and exotic watermilfoils. Oecologia 126:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spanhoff B, Kock C, Meyer A, Meyer EI (2005) Do grazing caddisfly larvae of Melampophylax mucoreus (Limnephilidae) use their antennae for olfactory food detection? Physiol Entomol 30:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesKent State UniversityKentUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations