Journal of Insect Behavior

, 19:623 | Cite as

Calling Behavior in the Primitive Longhorned Beetle Prionus californicus Mots.

  • James D. BarbourEmail author
  • Daniel E. Cervantes
  • Emerson S. Lacey
  • Lawrence M. Hanks

Many prionine species share morphological and behavioral traits commonly associated with production of volatile pheromones by females. Adults Prionus californicus Mots. are sexually dimorphic, males being smaller and having antennae that are much more strongly serrate than those of females. Females of this species produce a volatile pheromone that attracts males. We conducted studies characterizing calling behavior of P. californicus females. In these studies females typically lowered their heads and raised their abdomens while extending their ovipositors. The extended ovipositor was often flexed and the abdomen rhythmically contracted during these bouts which lasted up to 10 min. In some cases females everted a membranous, cylindrical sac from the dorsal surface of the ovipositor which was retracted before the ovipositor was withdrawn. This eversible sac has not reported for a cerambycid species, and is likely to be involved in production and/or release of pheromone.


reproductive behavior calling behavior pheromone gland cerambycidae 



We thank Joyce Ashcraft, Crystal Jones, and Karen Barbour for assistance with various aspects of this study. This research was supported by a grant to JDB from the Hop research Council, Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc., award no. K009607-ID6 from the Western Region IPM Center, and a grant to LMH from the Exotic/Invasive Pests and Diseases Research Program, University of California, under USDA-CSREES Grant No. 2004-34439-14691. This is a publication of the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station.


  1. Benham, G. S., Jr., and Farrar, R. J. (1976). Notes on the biology of Prionus laticollis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Can. Entomol. 108: 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, G. W., Blackmer, J. L., and Baird, C. R. (1984). Observations on the biology of Prionus californicus Mots. on hops, Humulus lupulus L., in Idaho. J. Entomol. Soc. British Columbia 81: 20–24.Google Scholar
  3. Cervantes, D. E., Hanks, L. M., Lacey, E. S., and Barbour, J. D. (2006). First documentation of a volatile sex pheromone in a longhorned beetle of the primitive subfamily Prioninae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Doane, R. W., Van Dyke, E. C., Chamberlin, W. J., and Burke, H. E. (1936). Forest Insects. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Duffy, E. A. J. (1953). A Monograph of the Immature Stages of British and Imported Timber Beetles (Cerambycidae). Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
  6. Duffy, E. A. J. (1968). A Monograph of the Immature Stages of Oriental Timber Beetles (Cerambycidae). Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. S. (1961). Observations on the ecology and behavior of the huhu beetle, Prionoplus reticularis White (Col. Ceramb.). Trans. Royal Soc. N. Z. 88: 733–741.Google Scholar
  8. Eyer, J. R. (1942). Life history and control of the giant apple tree borer. N. M. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 295: 14.Google Scholar
  9. Farrell, B. D. (1998). “Inordinate fondness” explained: Why are there so many beetles? Science 281: 555–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gemeno, C., and Schal, C. (2003). Sex pheromones of cockroaches. In Cardé, R. T., and Millar, J. (eds.), Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 179–247.Google Scholar
  11. Gwynne, D. T., and Hostetler, B. B. (1978). Mass emergence of Prionus emarginatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Coleopterists Bull. 32: 347–348.Google Scholar
  12. Hovore, F. T. (1981). Two new species of Prionus (Homaesthesis) from the southwestern United States, with notes on other species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Coleopterists Bull. 35: 453–457.Google Scholar
  13. Lacey, E. S., Ginzel, M. D., Millar, J. G., and Hanks, L. M. (2004). Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 30: 1493–1507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linsley, E. G. (1959). The ecology of the Cerambycidae. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 4: 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linsley, E. G. (1962). The Cerambycidae of North America. Part II. Taxonomy and classification of the Parandrinae, Prioninae, Spondylinae and Aseminae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol., 19: 1–102.Google Scholar
  16. Linsley, E. G., and Chemsak, J. A. (1997). The Cerambycidae of North America. Part VIII. Bibliography, index, and host plant index. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 117: 1–534.Google Scholar
  17. Ray, A. M., Lacey, E. S., and Hanks, L. M. (2006). Evidence of taxonomic patterns in volatile pheromone production by cerambycid beetles. Naturwissenschaften (submitted).Google Scholar
  18. Rotrou, P. (1936). Le Cyrtognathus forficatus F. ses Moeurs. Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc 16: 246–251.Google Scholar
  19. Santos Ferreira, G. W. (1980). The Parandrinae and the Prioninae of Southern Africa (Cerambycidae, Coleoptera). Mem. van die Nasionale Mus. Suid-Afrika 13: 1–335.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, J. D. (1995). Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. USDA For. Serv. Agric. Handbook AH-706: 747.Google Scholar
  21. Summerland, S. A. (1932). The tile-horned prionus as a pest of apple trees. J. Econ. Entomol. 25: 1172–1176.Google Scholar
  22. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Barbour
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel E. Cervantes
    • 1
  • Emerson S. Lacey
    • 2
  • Lawrence M. Hanks
    • 2
  1. 1.University of IdahoParma Research and Extension CenterParmaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations