Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 447–455 | Cite as

Extreme Promiscuity in a Mating System Dominated by Sexual Conflict



Coelopids live in wrack beds consisting of seaweed washed up on beaches. Their mating system is characterized by sexual conflict and convenience polyandry, with females resisting male mating attempts. We estimated the level of harassment by males and the success rate of rejection by females collected from a high density wild population. Males mounted a female every 8.41 min. Of these mounts 35% resulted in copulation. This suggests that females could be mated up to 5 times every 2 h. Females typically live for 3 weeks, and thus, could mate with hundreds of males during their lifetime. We found a 50:50 sex ratio throughout the wrack bed revealing that females do not avoid male harassment by leaving the wrack bed when not ovipositing.


sexual conflict pre-mating struggle convenience polyandry sex ratio male harassment multiple mating 


  1. Arnqvist, G. (1992). Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider—inter-sexual conflict or assessment. Anim. Behav. 43: 559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnqvist, G., and Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual Conflict, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Ausden, M. (1996). Invertebrates. In Sutherland, W. J. (ed.), Ecological Census Techniques : A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 174–175.Google Scholar
  4. Blanckenhorn, W. U., Muhlhauser, C., Morf, C., Reusch, T., and Reuter, M. (2000). Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106: 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blyth, J. E., and Gilburn, A. S. (2005). The effect of time interval between matings on post-copulatory sexual selection in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity 95: 174–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnet, B. (1960). Lethals in Free Living Populations of Coelopa frigida. PhD Thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J., and Rowe, L. (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, P. M. (1978). Studies on Genetic Polymorphisms in Coelopa frigida. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  9. Crean, C. S., and Gilburn, A. S. (1998). Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly, Coelopa ursina (Diptera : Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 56: 1405–1410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crean, C. S., Dunn, D. W., Day, T. H., and Gilburn, A. S. (2000). Female mate choice for large males in several species of seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 59: 121–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cullen, S. J., Young, A. M., and Day, T. H. (1987). Dietary requirements of seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 24: 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day, T. H., and Gilburn, A. S. (1997). Sexual selection in seaweed flies. Adv. Study Behav. 26: 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson, T. (1974). Studies on the biology of the kelp fly Coelopa in Great Britian. J. Nat. Hist. 8: 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, D. W., Crean, C. S., Wilson, C. L., and Gilburn, A. S. (1999). Male choice, willingness to mate and body size in seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 57: 847–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunn, D. W., Crean, C. S., and Gilburn, A. S. (2001). Male mating preference for female survivorship in the seaweed fly Gluma musgravei (Diptera: Coelopidae). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1255–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, D. W., Crean, C. S., and Gilburn, A. S. (2002). The effects of exposure to seaweed on willingness to mate, oviposition, and longevity in seaweed flies. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 554–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, J. M. (1977). Some Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Benthic Invertebrates, Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Helfrich-Förster, C. (1998). Robust circadian rhythmicity of Drosophila melanogaster requires the presence of lateral neurones: a brain behavioural study of disconnected mutants. J. Comp. Physiol. 182: 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muhlhauser, C. S., and Blanckenhorn, W. U. (2004). The quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behaviour 141: 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525–567.Google Scholar
  22. Pitafi, K. D., Simpson, R., and Day, T. H. (1995). Male mate choice for fecund females in seaweed flies. Pak. J. Zool. 27: 233–240.Google Scholar
  23. Rowe, L. (1992). Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim. Behav. 44: 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A., and Krupa, J. J. (1994). Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shuker, D. M., and Day, T. H. (2001). The repeatability of a sexual conflict over mating. Anim. Behav. 61: 755–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shuker, D. M., and Day, T. H. (2002). Mate sampling and the sexual conflict over mating in seaweed flies. Behav. Ecol. 13: 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thornhill, R. (1983). Cryptic female choice and its implications in the Scorpionfly Arpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122: 765–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Watson, P. J., Arnqvist, G., and Stallman, R. R. (1998). Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  2. 2.School of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations