Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of the 2019 Public Charge Rule Announcement and Publication on Prenatal WIC Participation Among Immigrant Families: Evidence of Spillover Effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzed the effects of the announcement and publication of the 2019 Public Charge Rule on participation of the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (WIC) among pregnant immigrants. A difference-in-differences approach was used to analyze the changes in prenatal WIC participation before and after the 2019 Public Charge Rule announcement and publication among immigrants relative to US natives. We identified 17,623,683 live singletons born in a hospital from 2015 to 2019. Compared to US natives, the odds of prenatal WIC participation among immigrants were 11.4% lower after the 2019 Public Charge Rule announcement, and 19% lower after the final rule was published. The results of this study suggest that pregnant immigrants may decide not to participate in the WIC program due to the fear of jeopardizing their immigration status after the announcement and publication of the 2019 Public Charge Rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors do not have permission to share data.

Code Availability

The STATA codes used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Final Rule: Litigation. https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-processes-and-procedures/public-charge/inadmissibility-on-public-charge-grounds-final-rule-litigation. 2022.

  2. Bernstein H, Gonzalez D, Karpman M, Zuckerman S. One in seven adults in immigrant families reported avoiding public benefit programs in 2018. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sommers BD, Allen H, Bhanja A, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Assessment of perceptions of the public charge rule among low-income adults in Texas. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2010391–e2010391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein H, Gonzalez D, Karpman M. Zuckerman S. Amid Confusion over the Public Charge Rule: Immigrant Families Continued Avoiding Public Benefits in; 2019. p. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez D, Karpman M, Kenney GM, Zuckerman S, et al. Hispanic adults in families with noncitizens disproportionately feel the economic fallout from COVID-19. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haley JM, Kenney GM, Bernstein H, Gonzalez D. Many immigrant families with children continued to avoid public benefits in 2020, despite facing hardships. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barofsky J, Vargas A, Rodriguez D, Barrows A. Spreading fear: the announcement of the public charge rule reduced enrollment in child safety-net programs: study examines whether the announced change to the federal public charge rule affected the share of children enrolled in Medicaid, SNAP, and WIC. Health Aff. 2020;39:1752–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barofsky J, Vargas A, Rodriguez D, Matos E, Barrows A, et al. Putting out the ‘unwelcome mat:’ The Announced Public Charge Rule reduced safety net enrollment among exempt noncitizens. J Behav Public Admin. 2021;4:45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC Program). https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/eligibility-and-coverage-rates-2018#1. 2022.

  10. National Center for Health Statistics. Natality Files 2014–2019, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program.

  11. Abby Budiman. Key findings about U.S. immigrants. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/. 2020.

  12. Barajas-Gonzalez RG, Ayón C, Brabeck K, Rojas-Flores L, Valdez CR. An ecological expansion of the adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) framework to include threat and deprivation associated with US immigration policies and enforcement practices: An examination of the Latinx immigrant experience. Soc Sci Med. 2021;282:114126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vargas ED, Pirog MA. Mixed-status families and WIC uptake: The effects of risk of deportation on program use. Soc Sci Q. 2016;97:555–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Watson T. Inside the refrigerator: immigration enforcement and chilling effects in Medicaid participation. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2014;6:313–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winham DM, Armstrong Florian TL. Nativity, not acculturation, predicts SNAP usage among low-income Hispanics with food insecurity. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2015;10:202–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Natta M. First do No harm: medical legal violence and immigrant health in Coral County, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2019;235:112411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu DM, Aagaard J, Levitt R, Whitham M, Mastrobattista J, Rac M, et al. Cohort analysis of immigrant rhetoric on timely and regular access of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rhodes SD, Mann L, Simán FM, Song E, Alonzo J, Downs M, et al. The impact of local immigration enforcement policies on the health of immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:329–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Castañeda H. Illegality as risk factor: a survey of unauthorized migrant patients in a Berlin clinic. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dondero M, Altman CE. State-level immigrant policy climates and health care among US children of immigrants. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41:2683–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benavides Q, Doshi M, Valent’in-Cortés M, Militzer M, Quiñones S, Kraut R, et al. Immigration law enforcement, social support, and health for Latino immigrant families in Southeastern Michigan. Soc Sci Med. 2021;280:114027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Novak NL, Geronimus AT, Martinez-Cardoso AM. Change in birth outcomes among infants born to Latina mothers after a major immigration raid. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:839–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gemmill A, Catalano R, Casey JA, Karasek D, Alcalá HE, Elser H, et al. Association of preterm births among US Latina women with the 2016 presidential election. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e197084–e197084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatzenbuehler ML, Prins SJ, Flake M, Philbin M, Frazer MS, Hagen D, et al. Immigration policies and mental health morbidity among Latinos: a state-level analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2017;174:169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young MEDT, Pebley AR. Legal status, time in the USA, and the well-being of Latinos in Los Angeles. J Urban Health. 2017;94:764–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tolbert J, Artiga S, Pham O. Impact of shifting immigration policy on Medicaid enrollment and utilization of care among health center patients. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2019;500. Available at: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/impact-of-shifting-immigration-policy-on-medicaid-enrollment-and-utilization-of-care-among-health-center-patients/. 2019.

  27. Rush D, Sloan NL, Leighton J, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al. The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. V. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:439–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliveira V, Gundersen C. WIC increases the nutrient intake of children. Food Rev. 2001;24:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Georgieff MK. The role of iron in neurodevelopment: fetal iron deficiency and the developing hippocampus. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36:1267–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rojhani A, Ouyang P, Gullon-Rivera A, Dale TM. Dietary quality of pregnant women participating in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Krzysztof-Blusztajn J, Mellott T. Choline nutrition programs brain development via DNA and histone methylation. Central Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2012;12:82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Andrews M, Bickel G, Carlson S. Household food security in the United States in 1995: results from the food security measurement project. Family Econ Nutr Rev. 1998;11:17.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skalicky A, Meyers AF, Adams WG, Yang Z, Cook JT, Frank DA. Child food insecurity and iron deficiency anemia in low-income infants and toddlers in the United States. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10:177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pollitt E. Poverty and child development: relevance of research in developing 1 countries to the United States. Child Dev. 1994;65:283–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bitler MP, Currie J. Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2005;24:73–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoynes H, Page M, Stevens AH. Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes?: Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. J Public Econ. 2011;95:813–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Black MM, Cutts DB, Frank DA, Geppert J, Skalicky A, Levenson S, et al. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participation and infants’ growth and health: a multisite surveillance study. Pediatrics. 2004;114:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chorniy A, Currie J, Sonchak L. Does prenatal WIC participation improve child outcomes? Am J Health Econ. 2020;6:169–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Soneji S, Beltrán-Sánchez H. Association of special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children with preterm birth and infant mortality. JAMA Netw Open Am Med Assoc. 2019;2:e1916722–e1916722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Phelan ST, Roche A-M. Ob/gyn involvement in WIC efforts breeds success. Contemp Ob Gyn. 2017;62:26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bottino CJ, Rhodes ET, Kreatsoulas C, Cox JE, Fleegler EW. Food insecurity screening in pediatric primary care: can offering referrals help identify families in need? Acad Pediatr. 2017;17:497–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Asgary R, Smith CL, Sckell B, Paccione G. Teaching immigrant and refugee health to residents: domestic global health. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:258–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for providing the 2015–2019 natality file, which is the main data source for this study.

Funding

This study does not receive any funding from external organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SC is the overall principal investigator and project director of this study and was involved in all phases of the research. SP contributed to formal analysis of this study and participated in original draft writing. AD contributed to conceptualization of this study and participated in original draft writing. KK contributed to project administration and original draft writing. MP contributed to methodology and original draft writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung W. Choi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 417 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, S.W., Park, S., Duah, A. et al. Consequences of the 2019 Public Charge Rule Announcement and Publication on Prenatal WIC Participation Among Immigrant Families: Evidence of Spillover Effects. J Immigrant Minority Health 25, 1229–1238 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-023-01523-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-023-01523-z

Keywords

Navigation