Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Immigrant Generation, Race, and Socioeconomic Outcomes of Mothers in Urban Cities: Who Fares Better?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immigrants living in the United States tend to exhibit racially stratified outcomes, with greater socioeconomic disadvantage experienced by immigrants of color. However, few comparative studies have examined this relationship among multiple generations of immigrant women. This study compared first-, second-, and third-plus-generation immigrant mothers on seven socioeconomic outcomes. Data came from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Our sample consisted of 4056 first-, second-, and third-plus-generation immigrant mothers living in U.S. urban cities. Logistic, ordinal logistic, and linear regression analyses were conducted to predict socioeconomic outcomes. Among immigrants of color, increased generation status was associated with worse socioeconomic outcomes. Among White immigrants, generation status was largely unassociated with socioeconomic outcomes. Results underscore the need for increasing support for immigrants and their posterity. Further research is warranted investigating mechanisms that lead to racially stratified disadvantages as immigrant generation increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radford J: Key findings about U.S. immigrants. Pew Research Center 2019: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/17/key-findings-about-u-s- immigrants/

  2. Bombom LS, Erhunmwunsee PO. Why they migrate: Empirical evidence. In: Abidde O, Gill BI, editors. Africans and the Exiled Life: Migration, Culture, and Globalization. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books; 2018. p. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Academies of Sciences. Engineering, and Medicine and Committee on Population: The Integration of Immigrants into American Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zong J, Batalova J, Burrows M: Frequently requested statistics on immigrants and immigration in the United States. Migration Policy Institute 2019: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states#Now

  5. Hamilton BE, Martin, JA, Osterman, MJK, Rossen LM: Births: Provisional data for 2018. Vital Statistics Rapid Release 2019; Report No. 007

  6. Suarez-Orozco MM. Everything you ever wanted to know about assimilation but were afraid to ask. In: Suarez-Orozco C, Suarez-Orozco M, Qin-Hilliard DB, editors. The New Immigration: An Interdisciplinary Reader. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 67–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas KJA. Diverse Pathways: Race and the Incorporation of Black, White, and Arab-Origin Africans in the United States. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nunn R, O’Donnell J, Shambaugh J: A dozen facts about immigration. Brookings Institute 2018: https://www.brookings.edu/research/a-dozen-facts-about-immigration/

  9. Hudson VM, Ballif-Spanvill B, Caprioli M, Emmett CF. Sex and World Peace. New York: Columbia University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luoma I, Tamminen T, Kaukonen P, Laippala P, Puura K, Salmelin R, Almqvist F. Longitudinal study of maternal depressive symptoms and child well-being. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(12):1367–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman SH, Rouse MH, Connell AM, Broth MR, Hall CM, Heyward D. Maternal depression and child psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011;14(1):1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harding JF, Morris PA, Hughes D. The relationship between maternal education and children’s academic outcomes: a theoretical framework. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2015;77(1):60–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. American Immigrant Council: The impact of immigrant women on American’s labor force. Washington, D.C.; 2017: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/the_impact_of_immigrant_women_on_americas_labor_force.pdf

  14. Ruiz AG, Zong J, Batalova J: Immigrant women in the United States. Migration Policy Institute 2015: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrant-women-united-states

  15. Gordon MM. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alba R, Nee V. Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. Int Migrat Rev. 1997;31(4):826–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Batalova J, Fix M, Bachmeier JD: The costs of brain waste among highly skilled immigrants in the United States. Global Detroit 2016: https://www.globaldetroit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/BrainWaste-FULLREPORT-FINAL.pdf

  18. Argeros G. Suburban residence of black Caribbean and black African immigrants: A test of the spatial assimilation model. City Commun. 2013;12(4):361–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tesfai R. The interaction between race and nativity on the housing market: homeownership and house value of black immigrants in the United States. Int Migrat Rev. 2016;50(4):1005–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenman E. Educational attitudes, school peer context, and the “immigrant paradox” in education. Soc Sci Res. 2013;42(3):698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Clark TT, Terzis LD, Córdova D. Substance use disorders among first-and second-generation immigrant adults in the United States: evidence of an immigrant paradox? J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(6):958–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Maynard BR, Qian Z, Terzis L, Kusow AM, DeLisi M. Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: Intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants. J Crimin Justice. 2014;42(6):483–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aretakis MT, Ceballo R, Suarez GA, Camacho TC. Investigating the immigrant paradox and Latino adolescents’ academic attitudes. J Latina/o Psychol. 2015;3(1):56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alamilla SG, Barney BJ, Small R, Wang SC, Schwartz SJ, Donovan RA, Lewis C. Explaining the immigrant paradox: the influence of acculturation, enculturation, and acculturative stress on problematic alcohol consumption. Behav Med. 2019;46(1):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hofferth SL, Moon UJ. How do they do it? The immigrant paradox in the transition to adulthood. Soc Sci Res. 2016;57:177–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haller W, Portes A, Lynch SM. Dreams fulfilled, dreams shattered: determinants of segmented assimilation in the second generation. Soc Forces. 2011;89(3):733–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coll CG, Marks AK, editors. The Immigrant Paradox in Children and Adolescents: Is Becoming American a Developmental Risk?. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Portes A, Zhou M. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. Annal Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 1993;530(1):74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Drummon-Lewis S. The children of immigrants. In: Abidde O, Gill BI, editors. Africans and the Exiled Life: Migration, Culture, and Globalization. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books; 2018. p. 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén; 1998–2017

  31. Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed). New York: Guilford Press; 2016

  32. Nemes S, Jonasson JM, Gennell A, Steineck G: Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009; 9(56)

  33. Portes A, Fernández-Kelly P. No margin for error: educational and occupational achievement among disadvantaged children of immigrants. Annal Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 2008;620(1):12–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pong SL, Landale NS. Academic achievement of legal immigrants’ children: the roles of parents’ pre-and post-migration characteristics in origin-group differences. Child Dev. 2012;83(5):1543–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Benham L: Benefits of women's education within marriage. J Political Econ 1974; 82(2, Part 2):S57-S71

  36. Furtado D, Theodoropoulos N. Why does intermarriage increase immigrant employment? The role of networks. BE J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1):1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Basu S. Intermarriage and the labor market outcomes of Asian women. Econ Inq. 2015;53(4):1718–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brigham Young University School of Social Work, Provo, UT, USA

    Sherinah Saasa & Samantha W. Escamilla

  2. Department of Psychology, School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Kaitlin P. Ward

Authors
  1. Sherinah Saasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaitlin P. Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samantha W. Escamilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaitlin P. Ward.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saasa, S., Ward, K.P. & Escamilla, S.W. Immigrant Generation, Race, and Socioeconomic Outcomes of Mothers in Urban Cities: Who Fares Better?. J Immigrant Minority Health 23, 793–805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-01059-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-01059-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation