Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Association Between Acculturation and Prenatal Psychosocial Stress Among Latinas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Latinas experience high levels of stress in pregnancy, however few studies have investigated how acculturation affects pregnancy mental health among Latinas. The goal of this study was to determine if acculturation was associated with pregnancy stress among pregnant, predominantly Puerto Rican women. Participants (n = 1426) were enrolled in Proyecto Buena Salud, a prospective cohort study of Latinas. Acculturation on a bi-dimensional scale that allows for identification with both Latina and continental US cultures (i.e., bi-cultural vs. high or low acculturation) was measured in early pregnancy via the Psychological Acculturation Scale (PAS), language preference, and generation in the US. Stress was measured in early and mid/late pregnancy using Cohen’s 14-item Perceived Stress Scale. After adjustment for risk factors, women with bicultural acculturation had significantly lower stress in overall pregnancy (β = − 2.15, 95% CI − 3.5, − 0.81) and in mid/late pregnancy (β = − 2.35, 95% CI − 3.92, − 0.77) as compared to women with low acculturation. There were no significant associations between proxies of acculturation (i.e., language preference and generation) and stress. Bicultural psychological acculturation was associated with lower stress in pregnancy, while proxies of acculturation were not. Bi-dimensional measures of psychological acculturation should be considered in future studies of maternal mental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yali AM, Lobel M. Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;20:39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hobel C, Goldstein A, Barrett E. Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51:333–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida J, Bécares L, Erbetta K, Bettegowda V, Ahluwalia I. Racial/ethnic inequities in low birth weight and preterm birth: the role of multiple forms of stress. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:1154–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chasan-Taber L, Fortner R, Gollenberg A, Buonnaccorsi J, Dole N, Markenson G. A prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors for gestational diabetes among Hispanic women: design and baseline characteristics. J Women’s Health. 2010;19:117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C, Dole N. Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity among pregnant women. J Nutr. 2006;136:177–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: March of dimes special report: maternal and infant health in US Hispanic populations—prematurity and related health indicators. 2014.

  7. US Census Bureau: The Hispanic Population: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs 2011; C2010BR-04 File 1.

  8. Falcón L, Todorova I, Tucker K. Social support, life events, and psychological distress among the Puerto Rican population in the Boston area of the United States. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13:863–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Motel S, Patten E: Hispanic Origin Profiles, 2010. 2012; 2016

  10. Zsembik BA, Fennell D. Ethnic variation in health and the determinants of health among Latinos. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alegria M, Mulvaney-Day N, Torres M, Polo A, Cao Z, Canino G. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders across Latino subgroups in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cervantes R, Gattamorta K, Berger Cardoso J. Examining difference in immigration stress, acculturation stress and mental health outcomes in six hispanic/latino nativity and regional groups. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018;21(1):14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Himmelgreen D, Pérez Escamilla R, Martinez D, Bretnall A, Eells B, Peng Y, Bermúdez A. The longer you stay, the bigger you get: length of time and language use in the U.S. are associated with obesity in Puerto Rican women. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;125:90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abraído Lanza A, Chao M, Flórez K. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alegría M, Canino G, Shrout P, Woo M, Duan N, Vila D, Torres M, Chen C, Meng X. Prevalence of mental illness in immigrant and non-immigrant U.S. Latino groups. Am J Psychiatr. 2008;165:359–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campos B, Schetter C, Abdou C, Hobel C, Glynn L, Sandman C. Familialism, social support, and stress: positive implications for pregnant Latinas. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008;14:155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abraído Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng Mak DS, Turner JB. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1543–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruiz R, Stowe R, Brown A, Wommack J. Acculturation and biobehavioral profiles in pregnant women of Hispanic origin: generational differences. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;35:E1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kasirye O, Walsh J, Romano P, Beckett L, Garcia J, Elvine Kreis B, Bethel J, Schenker M. Acculturation and its association with health-risk behaviors in a rural Latina population. Ethn Dis. 2005;15:733–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zambrana RE, Scrimshaw SC, Collins N, Dunkel Schetter C. Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1022–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Campos B, Dunkel Schetter C. Sharpening the focus on acculturative change. ARMSA-II, stress, pregnancy anxiety, and infant birthweight in recently immigrated Latinas. Hispanic J Behav Sci. 2007;29:209–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glynn L, Schetter C, Hobel C, Sandman C. Pattern of perceived stress and anxiety in pregnancy predicts preterm birth. Health Psychol. 2008;27:43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tropp LR, Erkut S, Coll CG, Alarcon O, Vazquez Garcia HA. Psychological acculturation: development of a new measure for Puerto Ricans on the U.S. Mainland. Educ Psychol Meas. 1999;59:351–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benet Martínez V, Haritatos J. Bicultural identity integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents. J Pers. 2005;73:1015–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barcelona de Mendoza V, Harville E, Theall K, Buekens P, Chasan Taber L. Effects of acculturation on prenatal anxiety among Latina women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19:635–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barcelona de Mendoza V, Harville E, Theall K, Buekens P, Chasan Taber L. Acculturation and adverse birth outcomes in a predominantly Puerto Rican population. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:1151–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Benediktsson I, McDonald S, Tough S. Examining the psychometric properties of three standardized screening tools in a pregnant and parenting population. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Remor E. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Span J Psychol. 2006;9:86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams LM, Morrow B, Lansky A, Beck LF, Barfield W, Helms K, Lipscomb L, Whitehead N, CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Surveillance for selected maternal behaviors and experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003;52:1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nast I, Bolten M, Meinlschmidt G, Hellhammer D. How to measure prenatal stress? A systematic review of psychometric instruments to assess psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27:313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spielberger CD GR: Manual STAI. Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado Rasgo. Adaptacion espanola. 1986

  33. Lee P. Is a cutoff of 10% appropriate for the change-in-estimate criterion of confounder identification? J Epidemiol. 2014;24:161–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Borders AEB, Wolfe K, Qadir S, Kim K, Holl J, Grobman W. Racial/ethnic differences in self-reported and biologic measures of chronic stress in pregnancy. J Perinatol. 2015;35:580–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kao T, Huang B. Bicultural straddling among immigrant adolescents: a concept analysis. J Holist Nurs. 2015;33:269–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. LaFromboise T, Coleman HLK, Gerton J. Psychological impact of biculturalism: evidence and theory. Psychol Bull. 1993;114:395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Killoren S, Zeiders K, Updegraff K, Umaña Taylor A. The sociocultural context of Mexican-origin pregnant adolescents’ attitudes toward teen pregnancy and links to future outcomes. J Youth Adolesc. 2016;45:887–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Silveira M, Pekow P, Dole N, Markenson G, Chasan Taber L. Correlates of high perceived stress among pregnant Hispanic women in Western Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1138–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bermúdez Millán A, Damio G, Cruz J, D’Angelo K, Segura Pérez S, Hromi Fiedler A, Pérez Escamilla R. Stress and the social determinants of maternal health among Puerto Rican women: a CBPR approach. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011;22:1315–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fox M, Entringer S, Buss C, DeHaene J, Wadhwa P. Intergenerational transmission of the effects of acculturation on health in Hispanic Americans: a fetal programming perspective. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 3):S409–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health Grant [NIH R01DK064902].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Chasan-Taber.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chasan-Taber, L., Kini, N., Harvey, M.W. et al. The Association Between Acculturation and Prenatal Psychosocial Stress Among Latinas. J Immigrant Minority Health 22, 534–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00909-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00909-2

Keywords

Navigation